Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[paul planet earth1] 19/4/2024 07:56

Unlike AGL who is running out of cash fast heading towards yet another diasterous cash placement.

£130m cash burnt to date and nothing delivered!

As for free shares who knows you may well be simply lying holding for years and didn't sell at 140p back in 2022 then claiming you sold up in Jan at 40p on thar two day spike before the share price collapsed to below 12p yeh right lol!

We can all say the same in hind sight tw@t!

[beeezzz] 18/4/2024 18:18

Yep...Certainly increased Mcap...Hmm, well Mcap of Samsung that is, not sure about Nano...best take a look..

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 17:53

Feeding time here then.

No reason why the directors shouldn't reward themselves after a four years of ultimately successful litigation, which would have been extremely grueling for all of them even without you lot constantly on their backs.

-----

Planet busted again. LOL.

[beeezzz] 18/4/2024 17:31

Management rewarding themselves after such a successful period...and why not...

[katsy] 18/4/2024 15:43

I see buybacks have been replaced with free shares.

[twatcher] 18/4/2024 15:35

circa 1M zero cost shares acquired, and 430K sold to pay the tax on them.

Whilst I was working out that shareholders who tendered in full were a few percent better off than those that did not, Directors were busying themselves cashing out £200K of nil-cost options at the same time as the share price was being supported by the company via the buy-back. Nice way to get a good price.

[weatherman] 18/4/2024 15:06

Price falls on options, and disposal - I was wondering where my freebie is? :)

[chilom] 18/4/2024 14:27

Cope harder my friend. Nobody said nano have to use the patents. They could be sold onwards.

[coiin stein] 18/4/2024 14:25

morning moaners and persistent whingers ..
hoping to hear from our 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥9842;𝐧Ү38; soon, when she eventually ...
𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥9848;𝐦 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫9847;𝐚Ү46;𝐞

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 14:19

Nanoco closed down their medical research department and have no immediate plans to reinstate it. There is nothing about it in the most recent presentations and this was further explained during the most recent Q and A.

Nanoco's commercial success is far more likely to derive from IR Sensors and Display, as they've explained. I have no idea why you think anything else. It's just one of your opinions based on guesswork instead of listening.

So not only are you a hypocritical name caller your insights are misguided.

I think calling those who disparage their own investments in public without regard for other shareholders 'morons' is completely justified. They're like a troop of chimps on acid. Anyone might think they have a shared agenda but I think it's all about transferring the blame for their own impatience.

[chilom] 18/4/2024 13:59

That's a fair point. It was never my intention to clog up the board. Apologies.

[yasx] 18/4/2024 13:50

I have filtered the 'tit'. He simply adds nothing of any value, not even for purposes of a good chuckle. I will also filter any contributor that engages him repeatedly since it is simply ludicrous that one has to wade through endless guff to finally come across a comment relating to Nanoco.

As for Nanoco, I tendered my shares. I am looking for an opportunity to buy back some of the shares tendered when I think the sellers are done.

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 13:18

Perhaps you should consider how many times you've called me a clown and how few times you've shared anything insightful.

Based on the context of your posts your sole objective seems to be trying to prevent me from speaking so I say you're a hypocrite,

[kooba] 18/4/2024 13:13

Chilom..highly commendable taking them to task in such a very reasoned way...unfortunately there is no reason with them so points well made fall on deaf ears.

[chilom] 18/4/2024 13:06

I'm not complaining about the company.

Perhaps you should reread your last two paragraphs and consider your posting history in their context and get back to us.

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 12:55

If you want to complain about anything the company does the correct place is during a company meeting where they can address your concerns.

On line whinging is weaponizing a public forum with foot-stomping tantrums. Only tiny children behave like that and that's who you are. Everyone can see that.

-----

You are on a mission against me today but it won't work. I'm not flustered but perfectly composed. You can carry on all day, it won't cause me the slightest concern. You're merely proving that you're the bully you say I am.

[nigelpm] 18/4/2024 12:42

Since company were happy to invest in their own company at 24p they should be all over a 21p offer price.

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 11:51

You do go on. What you don't like is that I disagree with you.

Nanoco have not put a foot wrong. Nothing that has happened to them is unusual or requires the type of forensic scrutiny given to them on the forums entirely by people who have no relevant management experience.

Getting a new platform technology into production is an extremely tough and risky business. It's easy to complain when you haven't tried. The vast majority who try, fail. Delays and setbacks and patent disputes are to be expected along the way. Accusations of insider trading by misguided traders and constant pumping and dumping by day traders are not.

You lack this perspective.

[terrorwit] 18/4/2024 11:09

I get that. You're critising me because I'm critiscing your strategy of constantly criticising our investment in public instead of selling, which is what you all should have done long ago instead.

It's infantile to spend your time complaining. It will achieve nothing but make things worse.

Sell if you don't like it. That's your only option. I'm not selling and I'm going to keep reminding you of your manifest stupidity until you stop.

[chilom] 18/4/2024 10:37

I'm not criticising nano.
I'm criticising you.