We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your Space | LSE:YSP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0LTKZ07 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 23.00 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 23.00 | GBX |
Your Space (YSP) Share Charts1 Year Your Space Chart |
|
1 Month Your Space Chart |
Intraday Your Space Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/10/2011 | 10:29 | YSP: Discount to Net Asset and Turning the Corner | 2,382 |
| 16/11/2006 | 07:57 | is NAV only 40p? why is trading at almost a 200% premium??????????? | - |
| 07/5/2006 | 23:41 | YOUR SPACE CHARTS | 48 |
| 16/2/2005 | 09:48 | Your Space PLC | 80 |
| 21/4/2002 | 17:45 | YSP - Your Space | 1 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 17/3/2010 07:40 by starwars4 wRIGHTY25, Bobby Fletcher said that they had been struck off the lse and that as for being a plc that was it but that they were still a going concern as a co and we all still had our shares in it " my comment was for what they are worth"then he did say that ysp was writing to the shareholders, thats why i put up the on here about keeping your share certs.You never know.Sorry i didn,t point that bit out at the time but i was in shock although i had written the money off in my head for the last 6 months when reality hits its still a shock on that amount of money. Anyway good luck on gkp im in there as well although again nothing but losses over the last 6 months. JIM |
Posted at 16/3/2010 09:22 by jaws6 3HEDI think most of YSP shareholder will be with you on this one. |
Posted at 16/3/2010 08:40 by starwars4 THIS IS THE RULE UNDER WHICH YSP HAS BEEN CANCELLED RULE 41 WHICH ACCORDING TO THGE LSE NEED SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL............An AIM company should state the reason for cancellation in its notification. The Exchange should be informed of the intended cancellation by email from the nominated adviser to aimregulation@london The period of 20 business days is a minimum. Where earlier communication is sent to shareholders convening such a meeting, an AIM company must notify that such meeting has been convened without delay. The notification should set out the preferred date of cancellation, the reasons for seeking the cancellation, a description of how shareholders will be able to effect transactions in the AIM securities once they have been cancelled and any other matter relevant to shareholders reaching an informed decision upon the issue of the cancellation. For the avoidance of doubt, the threshold of 75% set out in this rule refers to the percentage of votes cast (rather than 75% of the class) in respect of each class of AIM security. Consent may be granted through shareholders voting in person or by proxy at a general meeting. Circumstances where the Exchange might otherwise agree that shareholder consent in general meeting is not required would be where: (a) comparable dealing facilities such as upon an EU regulated market or AIM Designated Market are or will be put in place to enable shareholders to trade their AIM securities in the future; or (b) where, pursuant to a takeover which has become wholly unconditional, an offeror has received valid acceptances in excess of 75% of each class of AIM securities. Cancellation will not take effect until at least 5 business days have passed since shareholder approval has been obtained and a dealing notice has been issued. Sanctions |
Posted at 15/3/2010 20:33 by prezer shrek why not share with the rest of us? We've all been very patient and once again the BoD fail to deliver once again. |
Posted at 15/3/2010 16:39 by starwars4 if your so friendly with Turton and you say you have rung him and got a reply then share it with all of us on here,iv,e just tried that number and guess what no bloody reply.So you tell us what was said. |
Posted at 12/2/2010 08:00 by bobby.ifa bus ticket would be worth more than the value of my holdings.Didn't realize YSP was a bank. Wish I could take out a loan and never pay it back. |
Posted at 13/1/2010 20:51 by prezer JIM if i recall correctly Zeus have always been lets say elusive. They've merely enabled YSP to tick a box and IMO have added no value whatsoever. My guess is you'll hear nothing from them. |
Posted at 01/1/2010 10:56 by starwars4 WELL YOU NEVER KNOW IT COULD BE YSP AND OUR YEAR HERE,S TO A GOOD NEW YEAR TO ALL..............The cost of renting an office in Central London is set to rise this year as the effect of a two-year development drought finally bites.Rents for prime space have stabilised at £42.50 per sq ft in the City and £75 per sq ft in the West End. Cushman & Wakefield, the property consultancy, said there had been a flurry of lettings in the past three months that had soaked up much of the existing floorspace, leading to greater upward pressure on rents. The 2.6 million sq ft of space that was let in the last quarter of 2009 was the highest quarterly figure for more than two years - since the third quarter of 2007. In contrast, the 5 million sq ft of floorspace under construction in London is 42 per cent lower than 12 months ago. Cushman said that pressure on rents had "narrowed the opportunity" for tenants to secure new premises at historically low rent levels and to negotiate incentive packages with landlords. Most property commentators agree that rents will rise again over the next 12 months, after falling from a peak of £65 a sq ft in the City and £130 a sq ft in the West End in December 2007. However, the outlook for capital values for all types of commercial property around the UK is more mixed. Prices have risen by more than 5 per cent since last August but there are fears that a flood of properties coming on to the market from anticipated sales by the banks and the Government, a possible rise in interest rates and further company administrations may offset some of the recent gains. Related Links * Small Business: Companies flee cities in search of a better life * AstraZeneca leaves Central London to cut rent However, demand from investors is not expected to subside as the threat of inflation pushes those with cash into asset classes that will not see their value eroded. Michael Marx, chief executive of Development Securities, a developer that specialises in commercial development in the South East, said that the possibility of a return to inflation could persuade those holding cash to put their money into commercial property. Mr Marx said: "In 2010, the big players will be cash buyers, people with a surplus of cash who want to invest. This will be the pension funds, unit trusts and large private investors, as well as billionaires and sovereign wealth funds. "The big idea might be that inflation is around the corner. That's all you need to create an asset bubble. If you think that inflation is around the corner, you will deploy so that you are not in cash any more. Real estate will be a beneficiary of this switch out of cash." Mr Marx said that the sheer volume of cash that is being ploughed into UK commercial property is starting to push up the value of "secondary" shops, offices and warehouses - those that are less well located and have less secure and shorter leases. |
Posted at 20/9/2009 10:52 by starwars4 I might be optomistic but if they do get this done i would not be surprised if after the initial selling the share price per share could rise. My reasoning for this is finance would have been put in place for them to carry on the business the debts that have been dragging them down would have ether been written off or put on a repayment that they can afford,plus i would not be surprised if new money was introduced by perhaps helium or the other large holders or even the existing shareholders. Of course it is all dependent on getting the CVA it could turn out for the better not the worse,then again we could have already lost or our money but lets hope we haven't while there is life there is hope. I also feel that they would have learnt there lesson on giving out news items that effect the share price on time and more often. JIM |
Posted at 27/6/2009 10:51 by theo13 Good luck Jim, hope you're better soon. I'm just hoping that given time these will recover. IMO the problem is the Convertible Bond which will continue to hang over us for a long time. A very experienced investor called THE COUNT on the SOLA thread a long time ago explained why convertible bonds are really bad news for the share price. He got absolutely slated, which was unfair as he was only trying to provide an explanation, but sure enough the SOLA share price plunged and proved him right. It's too complicated for me to fully understand or explain though, sorry! I should have sold here as soon as they went for a CB. Live and learn! I think it is something to do with the future dilution leading to the opportunity for the loan company to short the shares, but someone else may understand it better! However, eventually we should pick up when the dilution has happened or YSP can pay back the loan. The business model is good. I believe, so I an just leaving my shares in the bottom drawer. regards Theo |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
