Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Westminster LSE:WSG London Ordinary Share GB00B1XLC220 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.25p +1.85% 13.75p 13.00p 14.50p 14.25p 13.50p 13.50p 1,086,414.00 12:30:01
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Support Services 3.4 -2.0 -3.5 - 12.28

Westminster Share Discussion Threads

Showing 13376 to 13398 of 13400 messages
Chat Pages: 536  535  534  533  532  531  530  529  528  527  526  525  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/2/2017
22:11
ME position confirmed. £12m cap vs £525m (over 15 years) contract. hxxp://www.aviationjobsearch.com/job/aviation-security-instructors/6976398
ileeman
27/2/2017
19:46
someuwin, nice piece of reading,much appreciated ,thanks mate
abergele
27/2/2017
19:10
Looks like something big is brewing... http://www.wg-plc.com/vacancies/
someuwin
27/2/2017
13:52
Getting close free stock charts from uk.advfn.com
ileeman
27/2/2017
11:02
The vacancies for female trainers are being processed by Wass Ltd, which is part of the Westminster group. More information here. www.wass-ltd.com/ Employment to start as soon as possible, with a selection of countries including those in the arab world. JG
judge grinder
26/2/2017
08:56
...Just click on the arrow to the right of his name and click 'view posts'.
someuwin
26/2/2017
08:52
Why is Tom's post moderated, i'd love to hear his views, just censor the swear words!
bazildonbond
25/2/2017
21:40
A special note on WSG 25/02/2017 hxxps://bonker99.com/
sweethungar
24/2/2017
19:20
Graham,..have you sold out of WSG??? if so why are you hanging about all day wasting you precious hours of life guiding us away from this slippery eal of a company. oh and how much are you being paid to downgrade WSG into the gutter.. If,and if by chance you still have shares in WSG, do you not think you are dangerously shooting yourself in the foot.. that's 3 good questions you need to answer,thanks.. --------------------------------------------------- a question for the holders,that delayed 183k..at about 14.16pm,paid well over the odds it seems,@14.73p..not registered delayed either later or earlier today or yesterday, but as it came on show..must be a nice buy..tia.. It would make any of the last days trades a bonus of buys,but we end the day down, so strange,almost like manipulation to me,oh well,,gla
abergele
24/2/2017
16:59
Not for you, this one, then, Graham! I think we've all got that now. Tks.
2magpies
24/2/2017
16:24
JG, look at the figures. If their target is 16 passengers per trip ( do the maths) then they must be significantly below that now n'est pas ? Hardly busy.
graham1ty
24/2/2017
16:09
Graham1TY23 re your post yesterday "To get to to £2m it would have to be £50 per trip, or $65 per voyage, and I am not sure they are managing that" I took the ferry a couple of years back and it was just short of $50 then, so could quite easily be 65 now. ................ edit to add ............ there were a number of boats offering this service, but most were rusting death traps, or speed boats captained by a 12 year old. I imagine the new ferry service is a very welcome addition and will be well used. atb JG
judge grinder
24/2/2017
12:14
Break by early next week imo. free stock charts from uk.advfn.com
ileeman
24/2/2017
10:54
Update that says very little, Darwin in the background ( not announced a second conversion yet) and surprise surprise, down goes the price. Cynically yesterday's strength will have allowed Darwin to shift a few more. They are probably disappointed it was not ramped a little more so they could sell into the strength. At the end of the day, no long term contract, pretty weak news from the ferry.....Er and nothing else. And they must still be burning cash, so the £1m raised in November will run out in 2Q. But, someone shouts, they are EBITDA positive. That is meaningless, first as it is an adjusted number ( and as Andy Brough always says that is usually "profits when you have subtracted all losses), secondly it does not reflect cash flow, capex or development spending. So, assuming that they have continued to shell out on the ferries etc, there are ( as announced) pre contract infrastructure costs, and pay all their family members, they will still be using significant cash. It all depends whether you believe they will sign another RR contract. It is almost exactly five years ( 20 Feb 2012) since they last signed one.
graham1ty
24/2/2017
03:02
Sandeep, they are using one of the many rival ferry services, not all of which are rubbish, such as Sea Coach. WSG has lots of competitors on this route
graham1ty
23/2/2017
22:46
So where are all the passengers going after they exit the airport.? If they can afford to fly, they can certainly afford a boat trip.
sandeep67
23/2/2017
22:23
Wynter, read the RNS it says full capacity is 9000 per month, and they are aiming for half of that. I think passenger numbers will be between 5 on a very quiet journey and say 25 at the most. Averaging about 10 per trip. In fact, if 16 per trip is the target ( from the RNS figures) it might be an average of less than ten per trip. Hardly packed. If the news was any better they would have told us
graham1ty
23/2/2017
21:06
Decent update, they needed to put something out.
broncowarrior
23/2/2017
20:30
......or it could mean 50% capacity of the boat = 35pax per trip. Say 20pax per trip at present and that doubles your figure graham.
wynterwilde
23/2/2017
19:52
They give enough detail to work out the numbers, roughly 10 passengers per sailing. I wonder how many crew ? And that is an average through the day, so some will have 15, some may have as few as 5 ? And thank goodness they never bought a boat that could take 200 passengers......Er they did. And the Sierra Princess is a 70 seater, so even their target of 16 passengers average per trip will use about 5% of their two boats capacity !
graham1ty
23/2/2017
19:32
I have pointed out before that a new transport link takes some time to reach its potential. If the ferry breaks even by the end of 2017 it will have done well. Passenger numbers would be expected to continue to increase after that.
this_is_me
23/2/2017
18:02
On target, 4500 is 54,000 per annum ( once they get up to that level of usage ) so say 40,000 this year. To get to to £2m it would have to be £50 per trip, or $65 per voyage, and I am not sure they are managing that. As an aside, total revenue for Managed Services for the whole of last year was just £1.7m. Has the one little boat leapfrogged straight past their only airport contract ?
graham1ty
23/2/2017
17:39
That's still c.£2m revenue/annum from a single boat - not bad at all!
on target
Chat Pages: 536  535  534  533  532  531  530  529  528  527  526  525  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:42 V: D:20170228 05:40:32