Westcity Share Discussion Threads

[kizer] 11/9/2002 10:59

No Plane? AA flight 77 (i am sure AA would like to know where it went then)
NO Bodies? I saw them on TV
No Grieving families? Have they got to be on a TV Doc. to be real?

3 metre wide whole? errrr not an expert on what happens when planes hit the ground at 500mph, but i am sure holes do appear.

No disrespect meant, but come on....... the web site is a farce.

[tip top] 11/9/2002 10:46

Agree on Pentagon stuff
No plane
No bodies
No grieving families.
3 metre wide hole.

[fse] 11/9/2002 10:12

My understanding for the collapse was that the Planes took out one or 2 floors OK and that the weight of the floors above the impact collapsed the floor underneath which was already weakened. In essence you have a situation which no one thought could happen where the weight of floors above fell through a 2 / 3 floor void and then collapsed the floors underneath.
This would have brought the whole mess down.
We have just poured 2 floors of concrete and reinforced steel in a house we are renovating in the Adriatic. The floors weigh in excess of 20 tons and this is just a private home.
If we dropped one of those floors from 3 stories up it would dam sure collapse almost anything under it !
The collapse came from above. Unexpected thats for sure and outside of the slide rule calculations of the designers !

I must admit though that the Pentagon crash site and the idea that the plane was headed for the White House is a bit hard to fathom and will probably always be a bit of a mystery. Its the only part of the disaster that I found confusing.

[rcturner2] 11/9/2002 09:25

I gave up when I got to the bit about the perpetrators being aliens.

Freaks!

[thegrimreaper] 11/9/2002 08:39

Me too, I was vaguely interested until I followed a link to this site.

Choose between PAL-version or NTSC-version.
The Price for the TWO tapes (plus paper transl.) will be:
EURO 65,- (PS: This is a special and very low price)
(Because this price also includes "Airmail shipping" and
"Registered Mail + Postal Money Payment service Fee" etc.)

Complete and utter drivel.

[bomfin] 11/9/2002 08:13

I didn't even read this tosh.
Go USA.

[fazzer] 11/9/2002 08:10

Youre all being conned.Your missing the big picture.It wont really make any difference to your lives(unless you were one of the pawns in the towers a year ago.

Wake up and smell the coffee, it fukin stinks

FAZ

[hyper al] 11/9/2002 07:46

It is human nature to always find alternative solutions to the truth.

That is my bit.

Please can we show some respect.

[kizer] 11/9/2002 07:34

Oh dear.

The suggestion that explosives were placed below the towers is crazy. Anyone seen the controlled demolition of a tower block with bottom charges?

The charges blow, and the tower, intact, crumbles from BELOW. Watching the WTC towers, the both collapsed from ABOVE.

And what of the plane that crashed into the forest? The people on board that plane resisted alright.

Simple really.

[stealth117] 11/9/2002 03:48

Very interesting .
When I first saw the Pentagon pics on the TV I too thought they were lucky not to have had more damage.
Too many people would have to be involved and its too complicated to even contemplate something like that. What if something went wrong.

[fanta] 02/10/2001 12:27

egos running wild here....?????

remember, no matter what your opinion or how you arrived at it, there's always gonna be someone else who think they're smarter than you, so therefore know better??...don't spoil your reputations by arguing...(at least not in public!!)

F

[fackit] 02/10/2001 12:17

dismouting a female lab technician....

so how fast was they travelling then at 32 ft per second presuming they were not in a thermal down draught oh wise one

[gauss] 01/10/2001 23:25

mi££ions. OK so we'll agree to disagree! I think fackit doesn't understand acceleration. The acceleration due to gravity is (roughly) 32 feet per second per second. He appears to think in terms of a velocity of 32 feet per second.
Maybe he should retire to his playground with the girls, though he may find they have grown up and are to be found in the physics lab.
I notice he calls you prof after writing down a few equations, which I remember from GCE 'O' level. You need to know a bit more than this to be a prof!

[mi££ions] 01/10/2001 09:16

Gauss,
We agree on the WTC but obviously disagree with the Diana incident.

I find it hard to believe that the white Fiat Uno can't be traced and that a trained chauffeur regularly drives at speeds in excess of 120MPH. He may have been in on it? Was he dying with some rare disease or are his family being well taken care of now?

fackit,
As I said earlier, please, PLEASE, PLEASE stay away from physics! An object falling at terminal velocity has no weight at all, although the mass remains constant. Objects of any mass will accelerate at equal rates when subject to the same acceleration. The earth's acceleration due to gravity, neglecting local variations and small differences in distance from the centre of the earth, is constant regardless of mass. However, the physical size of an object will slow its acceleration if falling through a material (eg.air) as the speed increases. For example, a man jumping out of a plane with an open parachute would reach terminal velocity in about 20 feet. A small metal dart would take several miles and could become supersonic.

I'll give you 4 (out of 10) for spotting the relevance of temp., density, humidity and the fact that humans are not very aerodynamic and tend to tumble chaotically!

Must try harder.

[fackit] 01/10/2001 03:55

MI££IONS
this is of course correct if you calculations account for the body falling head first all the way or horizontal, but if you were to watch someone falling it is usually a combination of these.
Also I see in you calculations professor there is no calculation for temperature, air density, Humidity and most important of all body weight.

Also put this into your calculations the spin of the earth causing the centre to bulge cannot give a constant, also most important of all it takes between 1700-1900 ft for a body to achieve maximum speed.

seeing as guess work was used prof I think all the time you spent studying calculations while we played with the girls was wasted, your figure of 120-185 mph. was worse than mine which was 125-156 mph. as they only fell 1250 ft maximum speed was not achieved .
Hope this helps with your future mathmatical calculations

[dazz17] 30/9/2001 23:58

1029,
Make's no difference wheather that nob bin liner had anything to do with the world trade centre, he has already been inplicated in the african embassy bombings and the previous bombings at the towers. the screwball and his lowlife mud hut dwellers have allready done enough to be vapourised.I suggest you go in the kitchen and make yourself a nice bacon sandwich,and then think before you post in future.