Waterlogic Share Discussion Threads

[steve133] 04/5/2007 10:02

looks like it was a sell mongrel the directors he must want a new kitchen!

[mongrels1] 02/5/2007 12:50

Trades (nearly) always get reported late on this one as the NMS is so small.

That 10K trade that has just shown up will most likely be a buy although it says sell.

I've bought this one quite alot in the last nine months and my trades have been reported incorrectly almost every time.

[cockneyrebel] 02/5/2007 12:36

Illiquid Aerotus - down 3 yesrerday, up 3 today.

CR

[bletherer] 02/5/2007 12:13

Now back up 3.5p on 0 recorded trades. Fun and games for the MMs.

[aerotus] 01/5/2007 09:00

Some gem this is! Looks more like a dog.

[130407] 24/4/2007 13:08

CR

Do you know of the main holders of WTL of the 13.11 million shares in issue.

TIA

[cockneyrebel] 24/4/2007 12:05

Cheers DorQ :-)

CR

[steve133] 24/4/2007 11:59

thankyou very much for that doubleorquits a steal at these prices may top up if for some strange reason we drift close to net assets.buy at the bottom sell at the top mr bullford!

[sheik yerbouti] 24/4/2007 11:54

Thanks DQ, 110p will do for me.

[doubleorquits] 24/4/2007 11:52

DS say:

Following a deep and unwarranted depreciation in its stock value over the past few weeks, Waterline issued a reassuring statement yesterday, highlighting that FY07 results (March year-end) would be in line with revised expectations, showing PBT of £1.8m. The PBT figure implies EPS (45% tax rate) of 7.3p, placing the shares on a multiple of just 9.0x for the year just-ended. We are leaving our FY08 forecast unchanged (10.3p EPS), driving a prospective earnings multiple of 6.4x.
* The management has confirmed with us that the historic cost overruns (relating to Coolectric) announced in March 2007 are now behind them following a partial reorganisation of the group's logistical operations.
* On a prospective multiple of 6.4x and offering a dividend yield of 5.0% (FY08E),we rate Waterline as a Buy and retain our 110p price target.

[sheik yerbouti] 24/4/2007 11:38

Daniel Stewart has a buy for Accident Exchange, a buy for Imprint and a buy
for Waterline.

[bletherer] 24/4/2007 09:07

"As I understand it", I think.

[liarspoker] 24/4/2007 09:04

Martin - what does AIUI mean ? I see it in a lot of your posts.

All In ???????

[sheik yerbouti] 24/4/2007 09:03

Moving up now the RHPS followers have gone.

[shanklin] 23/4/2007 11:41

FWIW, I understand that Daniel Stewart provided the chronically unclear (my description) wording in today's RNS and that WTL were prevented from re-wording it into plain understandable English. AIUI, WTL will be writing all the text for the results RNS which I am advised was 100% clear last year.

Cheers, Martin

[cwa1] 23/4/2007 11:40

Thanks for all the input guys and to those that took the time to call the company. Did any of you get a feel for how upbeat the comments were from the company, or were they completely deadpan announcement related stuff?

Pug. I agree that the comment was poorly thought out and can see where you were coming from. Amazing that so many people saw the comment before you edited it :-) Nice to see the eyes and ears are open on this board.

Nice to see it limp into the blue. Are all the RHPS ers gone now?

[pugugly] 23/4/2007 11:13

steve133:- Your supposition is correct rang the Company. - I deleted after discussing as there were no follow up comments here and did not want an incorrect interpretaion to be on the board. Had not expected there to be so many readers otherwise would have tried to script a corrective note. Smiler1 has done this far better than I could have done.

Measurenguy:- agreed absolutly - Yet another example of why announcements need to be very clealy worded.

CR:- Agreed - The announcement had the potential to confuse and confused me.

WCB:- I was going from the Printed copy of Refs Dated April 07 which shows no dividend for 07 or 08. Having checked the DS note of 9th March pleased to confirm your figures. Yet again printed copy of Refs is wrong. !!!

[masurenguy] 23/4/2007 10:23

Have spoken to the company. Todays update was meant to re-affirm a projected PBT after taking into account the one off write down of £500K as previously indicated in the 9/3 update.

Todays update is badly worded and could easily be interpreted as PBT of £1.8m before taking the one off write down. Reassuring to know but whoever wrote the copy for the trading update needs a lesson in Use of English !

[steve133] 23/4/2007 10:23

some nice buys showing today anyway mm's are over doing it unless other trades show latter

[cockneyrebel] 23/4/2007 10:16

Today's statement looks like it was issued to re-assure, they had already said this. They didn't have to say it again.

RHPS says buy at the top and sell at the bottom - there's a surprise!

CR

[smiler1] 23/4/2007 10:11

Ref Pugugly comment now deleted:
Have just rang the CFO. He has assured me that the statement today is consistent with that made earlier. The £0.5m adjustment to profits arising from logistic issues are not exceptional and therefore included in the pbt number of £1.8m. Todays rns indicates that there will be some non-recurring exceptional costs.

[steve133] 23/4/2007 10:08

why delete your comment pug know-one discussed it with you???or did you ring the company?