We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volvere Plc | LSE:VLE | London | Ordinary Share | GB0032302688 | ORD 0.00001P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1,225.00 | 1,150.00 | 1,300.00 | 1,225.00 | 1,225.00 | 1,225.00 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Consulting Svcs,nec | 41.56M | -537k | -0.2292 | -53.45 | 28.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/6/2016 08:25 | Thanks Freddie. | rp19 | |
06/6/2016 22:31 | He occasionally tweets on @JonathanELander. The interview was there. | freddiesparks | |
06/6/2016 19:11 | Thanks for the link. Thought he came across well and some useful snippets imo - aiming to continue to add value to and improve shire and impetus, anticipation of benefits to come with Sira and perhaps some "new stuff". (Shame the text in the article couldn't get the name of JMP correct!). | rp19 | |
06/6/2016 18:44 | Volvere chief hails. | battlebus2 | |
03/6/2016 11:12 | It's simple really, at the current share price the market values the 3 companies at c£4m (inc £2.5M freehold). You may believe that's an over valuation, an under valuation or a fair valuation. I think it's bonkers!!! | melf | |
03/6/2016 11:04 | Question my valuation methods if you will clacre, but I've been churning out nice EEZY profits in full public view... I expect, as you're so ballsy, you'll be doing the same? As if... | eezymunny | |
03/6/2016 10:56 | I thought it was being conservative EM... :o)) | rivaldo | |
03/6/2016 10:14 | Bibey must be using the EezyMunny company valuation method. | clacre | |
03/6/2016 09:54 | Award yourself a gold star for a great Friday ramp Rivaldo :) | eezymunny | |
03/6/2016 09:49 | This chartist site has a 1455p share price target for VLE :o)) | rivaldo | |
02/6/2016 18:01 | That's what i do when valuing companies If a company has excess net cash, that comes off the market cap If a company has significant net liabilities, that gets added to the market cap | spob | |
02/6/2016 17:58 | I suppose a sum of the parts valuation in any particular case depends on the nature of the tangible assets In any particular case you would have to consider liquid assets (eg: cash or possibly even surplus property) differently to assets which are inseperable from earnings | spob | |
02/6/2016 16:44 | I take your point, but assets come with built in liabilities. If I were a trade buyer of Shire it would be all about the profit generating capability and the tangible assets less so, excepting that I'm adding goodwill to my balance sheet. I really don't know how the tangible assets of Shire compare with the similar companies. | hpcg | |
02/6/2016 16:33 | Of course different companies with different business models in contrasting sectors will be valued differently. I'd assumed the comparison was the same business with a different balance sheet. | cockerhoop | |
02/6/2016 15:09 | I think a better comparison is a business which makes £1.5m and has net freehold and machinery assets of 0. Yes, potentially, indeed it could be worth more as it has no capital intensity. There are many cases of asset light businesses where the market ascribes a much higher multiple than capital intensive businesses. Cash or debt is not a question here, the subject was tangible assets. | hpcg | |
02/6/2016 14:57 | Hpcg, So are you saying that a £15m business with say £1.5m profitablity and £4m of cash/freehold assets is worth the same as a £15m business with £1.5m profits and debt of £4m? | cockerhoop | |
02/6/2016 13:23 | Constituency company hard assets can only provide a bottom end valuation, they can't be counted at all in upside valuation unless you think any sale price would be based on P/B and not a revenue multiple, cash profit multiple or GAAP profit multiple. | hpcg | |
02/6/2016 08:06 | clacre, ST doesn't discuss Shire's assets in the article, only the value attributed to the company in VLE's account which is a completely different thing. | cockerhoop | |
02/6/2016 08:01 | anyone planning on going to this yr's agm? | sladdjo | |
01/6/2016 15:29 | Rivaldo - ST did refer to the Shire assets:- "The point being that the investment in Shire is valued in Volvere's accounts at only £5.8m." I like his bit about 'in anyone's book' - not mine ST. | clacre | |
01/6/2016 12:28 | For some reason I went to the Sunday Times and searched for Volvere, coming up with this from July last year: An overwhelming majority of business leaders backed George Osborne’s increase to the minimum wage in a straw poll at yesterday’s summit, though a handful criticised the government for dictating to companies on pay. Asked to vote yesterday on the chancellor’s target of introducing a “living wage” of £9 an hour within five years, 79 per cent of those present, largely leaders of FTSE 100 or FTSE 250 companies, said that it was “the right thing to do”, while 10 per cent described themselves as neutral and 10 per cent opposed to the rise. One objector was Jonathan Lander, the chief executive of Volvere, an investment company that specialises in turning around troubled businesses. “It will increase unemployment,” Mr Lander said. He said that his company was often involved in trying to cut costs to save loss-making companies. It would seem that he is no sycophant. | backwoodsman | |
01/6/2016 12:19 | With regards to the current debate applying a value to Shire Foods ST says: 'The point being that the investment in Shire is valued in Volvere's accounts at only £5.8m. In anyone's book, Shire has to be worth £10m in a trade sale scenario, or six times' last year's pre-tax profit.' | cockerhoop | |
01/6/2016 12:15 | WD rivaldo, nice little earner! Dud | dudishes |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions