We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdant | LSE:VET | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B1HMZD32 | ORD 0.5P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.00 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 8.00 | GBX |
Verdant (VET) Share Charts1 Year Verdant Chart |
|
1 Month Verdant Chart |
Intraday Verdant Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/1/2008 | 15:42 | Verdant - new issue | 4 |
| 14/2/2003 | 00:08 | Virtual Internet | 221 |
| 24/5/2000 | 17:23 | VET could fall a further 70% from these levels | 2 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 01/2/2002 07:21 by richoneday NAV_Mike - Wonder if the 30,000 trades yesterday will be investigated. I sold two weeks ago at 33.5p but bought at 24p so I have no complaints. Last weeks rollercoaster meant that i was pleased that I got out when I did. Timing, as they say is everything. On balance If I still had my shares in VET I would sell and invest in other companies likely to be swallowed up.Well done to all VET holders |
Posted at 01/2/2002 00:08 by nav_mike Erm Jay, I dont want to rain on your parade but cash per share at the last accounts was c40p and NAV c57p. If you are using ADVFNs figures I am afraid you cannot trust them as up to date.Realistic bid price is hopefully 55-60 but a lot depends on VEts recent trading - last accounts were to July 2001 - six months old and possibly way wide of the mark. Hope this helps....are you a holder? Mike |
Posted at 29/1/2002 14:39 by tonyx NAV,:-))) You are correct-sold CAB because I was down on VET & wanted to bank profits (for once)!!! Sods law I suppose. Should have topped up with VET. Good luck with CAB. Tony |
Posted at 29/1/2002 14:26 by nav_mike Hi Tony - yeah Im still in VET - didnt see the point in bailing out Friday before results. U R right tho...very strange!What a rollercoaster... Friday - VET bomb then CAB jump 30% Tuesday - CAB relist down 30% but VETs jump! who said shares were dull? I still hold CABs but I bought on a 6 to 12 month view - I think the refinancing was positive and has just flushed out the weak holders such as you kind sir! :-P |
Posted at 07/1/2002 18:36 by mero I think the prospect of bid is more relevant than the fundamentals. Rumour will drive the share price until the bid issue is resolved. |
Posted at 10/12/2001 14:12 by manfromsony Lovegod... What will make the press stand up thus pushing the share price north? Plus who is Gadge? Can you develop your last postering please!Cheers ManfromSony |
Posted at 08/12/2001 10:17 by chadders Agressive Saver,I believe Jason Drummond holds the key to this one not Chris Akers. Drummond holds the controlling interest at 53% of the equity. He has been buying at 45p, he turned down an offer of £8, according to the Guardian article (although this can be largely discarded), the shares have a 12 month high of around 120p and his 'baby' is going to be one of the first internet technology based companies to turn a profit. Why should he sell cheap? Early yesterday after the initial price rise the MMs marked the price down to catch all the faint hearted and it didn't really succeed and the price moved up aggressively in the afternoon. VET shares are relatively scarce - only 500K traded yesterday and it was a big news item! There is much more scope in this than the current consensus suggests IMHO. This is not the normal scenario where the institutions would be happy to cut their losses, the negotiations will centre on an individual who believes in the company. What value VET when it reports it's first profit? I am sitting tight and remain confident. As always DYOR |
Posted at 07/12/2001 15:13 by stewjames alsfar, I like to see some evidence in the now of undervaluation. VET looks to be burning cash all too quickly and not growing the bottom line quickly enough to deserve a valuation even as high as today's to me. They say breakeven next year, I really can't see it. But then I accept I'm not much of a visionary :-)Host Europe, the operating performance is OK but I certainly don't think it's worth it's current market cap! Strange that even now people are still willing to assign the sort of valuations to techs that they wouldn't even think of giving to 'old' economy shares with similar or better financial perfomance. pacman88, sounds like that method requires a remarkable crystal ball. :-) Funnily enough VET was on my watchlist when the price was at its low, mainly for the cashpile and the hint (from the company, if not the figures) of stemming cash outflow. It'll be interesting to see how it pans out. I wish you (further) good luck. |
Posted at 07/12/2001 09:56 by aggressive saver Virtual Internet just recovered 0.5p. When they make the final anouncement later this afternoon the share price may go up double the amount again. Dont know what to do now about topping up, although the brave normally win. |
Posted at 07/12/2001 09:16 by aggressive saver The share price does not represent the takeover possibility, its what I thought the shares would go up to in a few days fundamentaly. Although I would of taken a profit today if there was not this news of a takeover. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
