||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
|Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Valirx Share Discussion Threads
Showing 18726 to 18743 of 18750 messages
|If bones was here we would be popping a pill and living till we all 150 but space has not been conquered contrary to some idiots in here.|
|Ok, I have let you both have the last word on the subject (on this thread), so consider the subject closed.|
|Nobby When was the last time you had contact with Suzy? are you still concerned with 401 breaking up in the gut? What early data would you like to see coming through that would convince you.|
|nobby I have k9/max/y1970 or satu or whatever it calls its other names but I can guess me and you are coming in for some unreadable nonsense, you can ring the office as much as you like but unless you agree fully with them you will get nowhere ! as for GM lol I think there is a village out there missing him !
not all of us are as gullible as yoda !!!
|timbo how on earth can we goad him ????
we are all filtered ! !
unless of course you know different ;-)
you should call it the rampers thread then lol|
I do not really have an opinion on that, as I do not know the full history and I don't particularly want to know the history in any detail. I do however have a view that there are plenty of other threads where you can goad Yoda as much as you like, but also there has to be places of sanctuary, where investors who do not wish to hear the same old message ad infinitum can go to express their opinions on the company (not fellow investors)|
|Agreed bossmanMeanwhile my 6p tgt was spot onI am now downgrading my short term price tgt to 5pI do see value at 5p but death spiral is in place and will drive these down imho|
|And maybe I will go blue as wellTimboYoda has cost a lot of people a lot is money ramping this at 200pHe is the one you should banHe has an arrogant way about himA Nasty person who bullies anyone who is cautious hereI told him 6p when 10p and he screamed with disdainI have been proved right|
|im sure yoda can confirm I take screen shots, hence several of his warnings/bannings ;-) so please don't slip up again, I understand you may be underwater a little but hey allow genuine posters to post !
maybe you should clamp down on rampant ramping ??
I will try to find you one lol|
|I have had extensive interaction with Suzy by email but she failed to convince me completely.
I'm pleased to hear it was a long debate and that you were nearly persuaded, but sorry you weren't completely persuaded.
I know you are very much concerned about the biochemistry, etc, but what do make of the tests the mice where the drug dosed on its own and then the partner molecule dosed on its own made no difference, but the two combined had a very notable effect on tumours(apparently)?
|nobby u r a good man
yoda is rude to anyone who has any doubts
hes blinkered and rude|
|I have had extensive interaction with Suzy by email but she failed to convince me completely. George didn't interact at all by email but I have spoken to him twice at investor meetings.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating as all that matters at the end of the day is the clinical trial results so despite my scepticism I am here with a small holding because the risk/reward is favourable. My debate is whether to go in large but for now I am not convinced. I think you should be interested in my concerns as a shareholder as I am a scientist who has worked in Pharma at all stages of development from discovery through to commercialisation so know to some degree what I am talking about.
|understandable really considering he is drowning here
I will put some of his psychotic rants up later
so we can see what a nutter he really is ! ! ! ! !
here to help your wealth :-)|
|~~ADVFN*MODERATEDJust look and read his puerile remarks.They say it all.
`I am taking my football home`syndrome!LOL
The reason I am here is because the massive potential upside if the science is proved to work. That doesn't stop me from being sceptical.
Specifically the problem with 201 is the half-life. Under the current weekly dosing the pharmacological effect is still apparent when there is nothing left in blood. George try to explain this by saying there is I rreversible binding to the target. However, everything which has an on rate has an off rate unless there is a chemical event which causes the formation of a bond, which I don't think he was suggesting.
For 401 the formulation with the fatty acid is dubious. Because it is just a physical interaction with no covalent bond, I can't believe that they stay together through the gut, across the gut and into the bloodstream. Once they part they will not come back together because of the enormous dilution effect in blood.
Answer those questions and I will buy in big time!
|Yoda FilteredHe talks biggest load of rampPointless poster|