We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trifast Plc | LSE:TRI | London | Ordinary Share | GB0008883927 | ORD 5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.80 | 3.58% | 81.00 | 78.20 | 80.80 | 80.00 | 78.20 | 78.80 | 145,475 | 16:35:05 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manufacturing Industries,nec | 244.39M | -2.87M | -0.0213 | -36.71 | 105.3M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/4/2016 11:22 | Listen: Malcolm Diamond MBE, Executive Chairman, Trifast - Trading update hxxp://brrmedia.co.u | 3rd eye | |
19/4/2016 09:13 | Very encouraging. TRI is not a particularly well-traded stock but there are things to get excited about (from an investors point of view). I think this update will draw some interest. I have consensus EPS at 9.35p but I don't know what the upper and lower guidances were. One or 2 will have to upgrade since those at the lower end will have been wrong! | thorpematt | |
19/4/2016 09:05 | TRI Trifast Cracking update, should get a run up to results now....... Accordingly, the Board expects the results for the year ended 31 March 2016 to be towards the upper end of market expectations. | 3rd eye | |
19/4/2016 07:58 | lovely stuff | robow | |
19/4/2016 07:33 | Today's update should provide strong support for the rising share price | boadicea | |
14/4/2016 14:08 | Well we aren't going to break anywhere unless someone buys any shares - 4 hours in and not a single trade | davr0s | |
13/4/2016 16:15 | Yep, taken its time but looking good. Good volume yesterday which often is a precursor to a move. We will see | davr0s | |
13/4/2016 14:18 | Heading for a breakout now...Takes patience | johnthespacer | |
22/2/2016 19:03 | To be hope so, I bought these last year 125p and it has only hit that mark once since. gLA | reddave999 | |
18/2/2016 15:36 | boadicea, I wasn't aware of CAR's exit from that sector and so it sounds quite good prospectively for a turnaround - good luck with it. I will stick waith TRI in the meantime, it has a good record of making acquisitions which are acretive which is one of its many plus points. As far as the FTSE is concerned I'd say it's a bear market right now and since "the trend is your friend" I have shorted it at just above 6000. I suspect we'll see 5200 at some point FWIW. I am fairly sure TRI will out-performthe wider index this year so I will be long here. On another note Woodford has been on about Brexit worries being "bogus". That could help sentiment for TRI and the like I suspect. | thorpematt | |
18/2/2016 10:21 | Yes. But 26 points of that is due to shares going exdivi today | davr0s | |
18/2/2016 08:57 | Errr, the FTSE is down 39pts today in case you hadn't noticed. | alan@bj | |
18/2/2016 08:28 | Simon T has really got this stock moving ...wow | reddave999 | |
17/2/2016 22:25 | The stocks (TRI and CAR) might be in the same market sector but the sectors mainly occupied by their customers are rather different. TRI is more competitive consumer based, I think. CAR mainly services high precision non-consumer applications e.g. medical, on the one hand (including for companies in which I am also happily invested) and supercar lighting products on the other, both of which have proved to be quite recession resistant. The reason for its lowly rating and relatively high debt is the aftermath of an unfortunate foray into the world of computer screen products which initially looked highly promising but which was overtaken by technical advances matching the quality of its product at lower overall cost. It exited this business reasonably tidily in the circumstances and now seems set for steady advance in its core businesses. Hence my decision to rebalance. However, I expect them both to do well in the longer term and I was mainly considering the likelihood of a shorter term setback. | boadicea | |
17/2/2016 20:52 | CAR has a better growth profile and subsequent low PEG but it never seems to produce any significant profit. The debt has been going up a little over the years and coupled with that lack of profit means it looks a little risky on some scoring sheets. For me TRI ticks most other boxes when in direct comparison, particularly the quality ones such as ROE and op. margin. Gearing and interest cover etc as you would expect look great in comparison. It has to be said that whenever ST and I hold the same stock it tends to end in tears so I hope that this time it will go the right way. I hear those concerns on exposure to gloal trends and speading risk. BUT is picking 2 stocks in same sector doing that really? If it were me I might go for an entirely differnet sector... Random choices of the top of my head HFG or JEL | thorpematt | |
17/2/2016 15:25 | That's as may be but I have nevertheless just switched half my holding into CAR, which I feel has a more secure, recession resistant market for its main products and is on a similarly lowly forward rating. That leaves the balance of my TRI on almost free carry at about 6p net cost. | boadicea | |
17/2/2016 14:40 | This is Simon T's summary:- So having initiated coverage on the shares in my 2013 Bargain shares portfolio at 53p ('Bargain shares for 2013, 7 February 2013), and remained positive ever since, I feel that a prospective PE ratio of 11 for the coming financial year not only fails to reflect the progress Trifast has made in recent years, but also the possibility of the business hitting or even exceeding forecasts. I am not the only one thinking this way as analyst Jo Reedman at broking house N+1 Singer has a target price of 139p; David Buxton at finnCap has fair value at 143p; Henry Carver at house broker Peel Hunt has a 150p target; and Mr Thefaut at Arden Partners has a buy recommendation too. Offering very decent upside to my target price of 140p, I continue to rate Trifast’s lowly rated shares a decent buy on a bid-offer spread of 110p to 112p. | alan@bj | |
17/2/2016 13:28 | Thanks EC. He seems fairly persistent in tipping this. | gleach23 | |
17/2/2016 12:47 | That's all we need right now! | reddave999 | |
17/2/2016 12:23 | Tipped by Simon Thompson in the IC, hence the rise today. | effortless cool | |
17/2/2016 11:05 | I like this company but I suspect the market is going to question how they'll cope in an uncertain,choppy economic climate.Switched into Melrose. | steeplejack | |
16/2/2016 17:02 | The company seems to be performing well which is a relief these days, although one doesn't see progress becoming any easier in the near future. The decision to trim my holding into the good news however was encouraged in part by the tortured prose of the announcement. Doesn't anyone proof read these? Aren't they vetted by the nomad? The punctuation alone would have earned a generous splash of red ink when I was at school! (Some years ago.) Conclusion: The company is overly economising on secretarial support staff. | boadicea | |
16/2/2016 09:17 | A muted market response to an excellent update.Just as well the update was so positive given the market remains in such an unforgiving mood. | steeplejack |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions