Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

[ionlypostafterbbms] 08/2/2017 11:50

luanorte75

8 Feb '17 - 10:25 - 3935 of 3937

I am actually not an expert but have done my research....

Did your research uncover that yorgi has been identified & outed in Hulsey Smith's lawsuit against AERO as a paid ramper? Possibly one of several promoting AERO?

[andy] 08/2/2017 11:49

Dennis,

Where would you like to meet?

I'm in London today, are you?

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 11:37

Andy, You are a cheat and a liar, Proved! and now attempting to cover yourself with yet more lies and wayward accusations.
This is correct isn't it?
What a dishonest sneaky backstabber you truly are, I certainly would love to meet you face to face and see what you have to say, but then you couldn't defend yourself could you! the only reason for your existence is being able to hide behind your screen and many ID's, Is this exactly how it is or would you like take up my offer?

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 11:23

Andy, You're getting ahead of yourself again aren't you, Where do you get no profit in 2017 from?, Taking liberties as usual!
As far as things stand, Aero are looking to be profitable by the year end, We also know that news of a contract or two could come anytime which would be a bonus and could therefore lead to a sharp rise in the SP, Is this not correct,
So while you and others post about what could give your views a belated boost things are changing to positive, Is this not the current state here? Ignoring and covering will i suppose help shorting but can only work if there is convincing evidence of further decline.
As usual you are doing your very best but you're not as convincing as you once were, Are you?

[luanorte75] 08/2/2017 10:36

You here to balance posts? My god, do you really spend your life doing this when you have no interest in the business? What a sad a lonely life you must lead. What type of individual would waste their time doing this for the past 9 months? A grudge against the company? Did you lose money here? If that is the case, I am sorry. Hate is not the solution.

[andy] 08/2/2017 10:31

lunanorte,


With double the shares in existence?

And no profit in 2017?

I don't think this is a viable business proposition as a publicly listed company, it would work better privately, but then they would lose access to funding via the public market of course.

An AIM listing with associated costs isn't cheap!

[luanorte75] 08/2/2017 10:25

I am actually not an expert but have done my research and I am happy with my holding. Double up from here, I think I am on to a winner! Back to the share price of one year ago? In 3-4 years.

[andy] 08/2/2017 10:24

mip55,

Unless you're short and you need to deliver of course!

I didn't need to use Google for that.

This stock is too small for a spreadbet company so that issue is non existent.

[andy] 08/2/2017 10:21

luanorte757 Feb '17 - 22:13 - 1991 of 1994 4 0
Andy

What I don't understand is why people spend so much time (every single day) bashing an investment they don't have?! The only explanation is that people like you have a spreadbet shorting the stock?!


-------

The fact is that Dennis is continually posting incorrect and misleading comments about this company, so people like myself come here to balance out those posts with some facts.

In terms of the legal case, if they "won", why were AERO taking HS to court in the first place then? And why did they inform investors that HS's case "had no merit"? Was that accurate or misleading in light of subsequent events? Why go to that trouble if they "won"?

You and I both know AERO lost, don't we?

My take on the court case is HS knew they couldn't pay in cash, so took the best option he could, $75K plus shares that he has already sold, at a price higher than now.

If I were him I would have done the same, with the subsequent dilution the value of every share has halved, and they still haven't paid back the eye wateringly expensive loan they took out in November!

The placing didn't raise much in the grand scheme of things, and I think there will be another one soon unless somebody invests directly.........

[mip55] 08/2/2017 10:11

For goodness sake .... The WHOLE point is that if a stock goes to zero you don't have to buy it back!! I suggest you either get a grown up to explain this to you or Google it yourself.

[andy] 08/2/2017 10:11

luanorte,

The shorter would obtain stock from a holder for a minimum price, and the holder would be grateful to retrieve something after seemingly losing it all. It would all be done within the same broker as he would know where to find the stock.


AERO is too small for spreadbet companies!


It's interesting that after not posting on ADVFN for nearly two years you appear here, and are a well informed expert on everything AERO!


I wonder if you're another one of Dennis' ID's?

[luanorte75] 08/2/2017 09:39

Are you tommy or mip55?

Can you please explain how you can buy the shares back if the stock goes to zero or is in administration if you short the stock? On the other hand, how can you close your spreadbet position if the company goes into administration? You are really a fool, lol.

[mip55] 08/2/2017 09:34

Luanorte.... please,please for your own sake, don't offer investment advice. You clearly do not understand that any stock that goes to zero is a shorter's dream. You have totally misunderstood this and by your condescending comments made yourself look foolish in the extreme. And no ... I don't ever short a share but I do it seems understand a little more than you do!

[yorgi] 08/2/2017 09:03

And up we go :-)

[luanorte75] 08/2/2017 09:02

Tommy - You are an idiot! Can I ask you a question? Do you understand what shorting means? Maybe not? Well, it means if the stock goes to 0 or the business goes into administration you lost your investment.

You are just another wannabe investor that thinks by using trading terminology your arguments have some validity. My advice to you Sir/Lady, go back to college to learn how to read and write.

One last thing. Here are some bullet points for your enjoyment. If everything does not work, we can become a training, DDM and survey business which are/will be profitable and growing. Sorry, that is actually our business!

• Survey & Inspection Services division, Geocurve, continues to trade in line with expectations

• Geocurve has been trading profitably since the commencement of its multi-year Environment Agency contract in September 2016 - management is encouraged by progress made to date

• Geocurve is performing as a standalone business unit and the Board does not expect it to require any additional funding from Strat Aero in the near term

• First courses of Strat Aero's Advanced Unmanned Technical Qualification ('AUTQ') programme due to be delivered by its franchisees in Asia and by the Company in the UK by the end of Q4 2016 and early 2017

• Review underway of all of the Company's activities and cost base in the United States in line with strategy to focus primarily on securing additional contracts for its proprietary Digital Data Management ('DDM') system

[yorgi] 08/2/2017 09:01

Were the large delayed buys that were listed yesterday afternoon the Rai Group adding....remains to be seen.

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 08:53

Desperately posting on every thread pottymagic! you again getting mixed up and answering as ID andy, Your suggestions, guesses could i suppose might be right but nothing really to do with the current positive outlook based on the progress you consistently ignore are they?
You need to have a rethink about what was, what is and what will be, Could take a while after the mess you've got yourselves into but could be worth it, and quite soon too?

[yorgi] 08/2/2017 08:49

Back up to all square and buyers paying the full offer again :-)

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 08:47

So pottymagic! you again are ID andy, and you suggestions, guesses could i suppose might as you say be right but nothing really to do with the current positive outlook based on the progress you consistently ignore are they?
You need to have a rethink about what was, what is and what will be, Could take a while after the mess you've got yourselves into but could be worth it, and quite soon too?

[tommy25] 08/2/2017 08:29

mm are lowering the price and the suckers are buyings, and falling into mm trap. dont but this rubbish, they will go administration this year. short to 0p

[pottermagic2310] 08/2/2017 08:15

THEY INTEND TO TRY TO RAISE £5M THROUGH A MASSIVE SHARE ISSUE.
How is that £5m being raised ?
What impact will it have on all existing Shareholders ?
What will it actually mean in terms of Ownership of SA ?
What might it mean in terms of maintaining a presence on AIM ?
What might it imply about new Business SA might be on the verge of securing ?
What will it actually mean to the Market Cap and SP, taking into consideration the great likelihood that something like 3x the current Shares may be added to the pot as a result ?
What will it mean to anybody who bought into this all the way down from 8p through 4p, then 2p to today's .165p ?
Could the current .165p share price actually be diluted to (relatively speaking and for existing Shareholders) in the event that the equivalent of 5.3billion additional shares get issued to raise ?!!!!

Any view on the FACTS & Figures BygD ?... and how those might further diminish the long-term holding you claim to have had in SA... ?

[pottermagic2310] 08/2/2017 08:11

How is that £5m being raised ?
What impact will it have on all existing Shareholders ?
What will it actually mean in terms of Ownership of SA ?
What might it mean in terms of maintaining a presence on AIM ?
What might it imply about new Business SA might be on the verge of securing ?
What will it actually mean to the Market Cap and SP, taking into consideration the great likelihood that something like 5x the current Shares may be added to the pot as a result ?
What will it mean to anybody who bought into this all the way down from 8p through 4p, then 2p to today's .165p ?
Could the current .165p share price actually be diluted to (relatively speaking and for existing Shareholders) in the event that the equivalent of 5.3billion additional shares get issued to raise ?!!!!

Any view on the FACTS & Figures BygD ?... and how those might further diminish the long-term holding you claim to have had in SA... ?

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 07:52

Hey Andy, Tell us what they did say?

[bygdennis] 08/2/2017 07:51

It seems quite obvious you have, My investment is my good fortune as is whatever price I have, I think you may underestimate investors now we're on the way up.
How you hope to convince anyone the information we have can somehow be seen as negative!
We could see much progress up to the GM and beyond, £5m in hand to enhance our current position of moving into profit! Imagine the impact of just this on the share price
Not much you can say will fool anyone now, Is there?

[luanorte75] 07/2/2017 22:13

Andy

What I don't understand is why people spend so much time (every single day) bashing an investment they don't have?! The only explanation is that people like you have a spreadbet shorting the stock?! Or, which would be sad, have nothing else to do and sadistically enjoy the suffering of others?!

In regards to this investment, I think that there is potential at the level I bought. Therefore, whatever the 'village idiots' say, won't change my mind. If I had bought at a higher price, then maybe I would have sold a long time ago.

In terms of the legal case, am I correct in saying that AERO had a $775,000 loan payable over 3 years which was part of the purchase cost of AK which was cancelled after the settlement? AERO had to issue shares (lower value vs the loan) plus $75000? I wonder who won?

Finally, I just remembered something that you might be able to answer. Didn't AERO make a $5,931,933 which included $2,028,235 impairment of goodwill arising from the acquisition of the Aero Kinetics business? If that is the case, would it fair to say that the £2.5m contract (£1m current financial year), reduction in cash burn, further contracts in the current financial year will reduce significantly the loss in the current financial year or even be close to a profit? I wonder.

Whatever happens from here on, I don’t think our new shareholder would willingly want to lose £150k if they/he didn’t think there is potential here?