ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

AERO Strat Aero

1.15
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Strat Aero LSE:AERO London Ordinary Share GB00BFX0ZN92 ORD 0.2P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 1.15 1.05 1.25 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

Showing 5626 to 5648 of 8900 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  236  235  234  233  232  231  230  229  228  227  226  225  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
17/10/2016
11:34
Andy! last time, read the RNS! What's wrong with you?
What i say is irrelevant unless those reading check for themselves, On the other hand you lot can post what you like and hope for the reaction you hope for.
After Months of reading your stuff everyone following knows it cannot be relied on as accurate and check everything for themselves.
There is nothing at this time to do except follow as much news as possible in this sector and any links provided for possible moves, News will come to show where we are and where we expect to be, Until then there is no reason for you lot to try to sneak in and attempt to assume or try to confuse anything.
You lot have been posting only negatively for months yet have no shares here, It seems certain this is not your interest, so why you post is open for what motivates you but it certainly seems it's is not for the good of SA or it's investors, This being the case why not let those involved get on with it.
If we are proved wrong then you can come back and gloat, Likely though this would be the last time you will have any reason to interfere.

bygdennis
17/10/2016
10:46
Bygdennis,


Please post the link confirming "the government" have awarded AERO "a 10 year contract".

No messing, no waffle, just the link please.......................

andy
17/10/2016
10:35
Andy Read the RNS, What you say is only what (you) say, What is real is in my posts and can be checked for accuracy and those reading will see what they see.
My advice as always been to check things out and believe what you make of it. Do you ever watch TV Documentaries, Look at developments and what we can expect in the future? Muckshifter was saying drones cannot put pegs in, but is this temporary? They can build walls and many other things you and some may think impossible, As this sector moves on and the technology improves inevitably things will change, Laws will be put in place for the concerns there are but progress will continue and those with knowledge and experience to address these concerns as SA have if you research what has been said and done then you will understand the trust there is that SA are going in the right direction.
Read up Andy, and try to grasp what SA have developed in their package of services and the acquisitions they have made give them so much scope for success as laws are passed and the training they can offer is necessary rather than an option.
Put this with the full package and what SA have developed worldwide it isn't difficult to imagine what moving on means as this sector and SA moves on from a difficult period and the awareness of what this technology is capable of. Andy! again! Check before you comment!

bygdennis
17/10/2016
10:26
rog the mug,

3 questions on the WTG thread you are still avoiding answering. Rather than spend your time stalking & trolling Andy can you please answer them? They're not that hard surely.

1) When did you sell WTG?

2) Why did you sell WTG?

3) Who do you think you are talking to when you address me?

ionlypostafterbbms
17/10/2016
10:20
'Andy' you are beginning to remind me of someone else! lol
rogthepodge
17/10/2016
10:08
"the fact SA having secured a ten year contract with the government"

Naughty naughty, that's a falsehood and you know it!

-------

OK


Please post the link confirming "the government" have awarded AERO "a 10 year contract".

No messing, no waffle, just the link please.......................

andy
17/10/2016
09:57
Andy! Your post shows you are out of touch and have no idea of what is and what isn't.
Anything you post is considered irrelevant and grasping at straws!
Read the RNS about the government contract! You silly person!.
I thought you and your group had realised there was nothing left for you to offer and left SA and shareholders to move on without your dubious guessing and mind games, So much for thought!
Andy! no one is listening to you! Eventually you will understand the future goes forward and you lot are firmly in the past.
I am only trying to help you! Get in touch with this sector and what is going on! It's all been in my posts over the last months, Research properly everything available and try to be realistic before you comment, The potential is huge and the negatives?
Well group! What are they? As we move on!

bygdennis
17/10/2016
09:25
bygdenne,

welcome back, I've missed your constant ramping and was concerned about your non appearance here, in fact there were no posts for a week!

You never answer the hard questions put to you though......Do you?

The age of the drone is most certainly here, they have so many uses, I totally agree.

However, the age of a listed company being able to produce a profit and create shareholder value flying drones has yet to arrive, and judging by their last accounts, it will be some time yet, if ever.


Sadly you don't 'do' accounts, or you would realise that for yourself.


" your recent efforts have not seen any exit of holders who keep up with this sector"

What? I'm not making any "efforts"! I am just expressing an honest opinion about a company on a stock discussion board, if people want to sink their life savings into AERO then they are free to go ahead and do so, I won't try and stop them. It's their money and they are free to waste it as they please.


"Has there ever been a better time to invest"? Should be worded has there ever been a good time to make an investment here, and for the answer, refer to the chart, 8p to 0.055p gives you the answer.


"the fact SA having secured a ten year contract with the government"

Naughty naughty, that's a falsehood and you know it!

That's why it's important that people are free to express an honest opinion on these boards, to pull people like yourself up that are trying to mislead people into thinking the company has better prospects than it has.........

My guess is you're the poster formerly known as Yorgi, am I right?

andy
17/10/2016
08:51
Hi bgydennis, Potty and andy, I have only answered your posts and will continue.
The age of drones is here if you follow reliable news. Your hope for lack of interest in SA is not correct, your recent efforts have not seen any exit of holders who keep up with this sector and not as easily influenced by your dubious posting.
News will come in due course and the fact improvements and new developments are being made continuously and the fact SA having secured a ten year contract with the government shows they have no doubts about SAs package of service and capability far into the future.

Has there ever been a better time to invest? Should there be a fund raise It is unlikely it will be at a lower price than the last which was highly discounted, makes sense that the share price being just above that is considered a very sound investment and a placing at any time could bring instant and lasting rewards as we progress.

bygdennis
16/10/2016
12:09
potter,

That's a bolt on certainty I would say, by the end of November anyway.

Either that or they have drastically reduced their cash burn rate, but no RNS has been released to that effect,which one would expect if they had taken such measures.

andy
15/10/2016
21:15
Fund Raise before November... almost odds-on
pottermagic2310
15/10/2016
20:13
Well, the gang departed because the share price looked very poorly - now, due total lack of investor interest, it appears to be flatlining. RIP. Even this chat shop is dead since we left, and the Menace seems out of a job.....however, this prod might wake him up so he can tell us about all the contracts pouring in and how SA is the leader in this sector etc etc.
bgydennis
12/10/2016
13:13
rog,

You're too stupid to play this game, as you've proven by losing all your money in QPP & SGH. You can't blame TW when he told everybody AT LEAST A THOUSAND TIMES to avoid those companies & you ignored him. Indeed you bought SGH to spite him!

Well, that showed him, huh?

Please, stay out of the market before you lose everything.

ionlypostafterbbms
12/10/2016
11:34
If a company won a case for defamation/libel, then TW would have to pay both party costs. If he didn't have the assets to pay - because they were hidden away - he would be bankrupted, which would have severe repercussions on his business activities and reputation.

So if a company thought they had a case they would sue to clear their names and ppotentially bankrupt him and remove a thorn in their sides. But they don't: "They don't sue him because the last thing they want is to give his legal team access to their files, emails, bank accounts etc under the rules of discovery where TW's legal team would likely find much amiss that backs up TW's assertions."

Although it's worth pointing out that Discovery does not cover 'fishing expeditions' - the plaintiff or defendant would have to ask for specific documents, or emails covering certain periods - they don't have carte blanche to dig around indiscrimanntly (or at least that is my understanding)...

club sandwich
11/10/2016
08:57
Rog,

Yes he boasts about that, but is it true, or does he just say that to deter people from pursuing him legally? Has a company ever checked?

I actually think it's probably true, and sensible, as it allows him carte blanche to write what he thinks without being threatened by bullying lawyers.

But if a company is serious about clearing their name, they would go through and take him to court.

But that would involve the disclosure process and maybe that is the deterrent? Tom always mentions he is looking forward to requesting documents, and seems to know what he will be requesting, and then it all goes quiet.

andy
11/10/2016
01:12
TW boasts that he hides his assets in case he is sued

Q.E.D.

listen to his laughable Trumpesque podcasts (which I have been foolish enough to do in the past)

rogthepodge
10/10/2016
17:07
God, you are so thick.

Where TW's assets are or indeed if he has any at all will have no bearing WHATSOEVER on whether a plaintiff is successful in a suit against him. They are suing because TW has impugned their reputation, not as a money making exercise.

They don't sue him because the last thing they want is to give his legal team access to their files, emails, bank accounts etc under the rules of discovery where TW's legal team would likely find much amiss that backs up TW's assertions. Most execs are also reluctant to perjure themselves, something judges take a very dim view of.

It ^^^ is obvious if you are not a bloody fool.

ionlypostafterbbms
10/10/2016
09:10
If there are some further contracts in the pipeline of similar value to the last contract announced then a £2m market cap looks way too low in my opinion but the deals are required of course.
yorgi
09/10/2016
22:51
sid,

How's it going so far?

andy
07/10/2016
17:24
bygdennis7 Oct '16 - 16:00 - 2758 of 2760 1 0
Andy, You're a Donkey, SA were given the contract so keep quiet.


Andy7 Oct '16 - 15:20 - 2755 of 2760 0 0 Edit
Bygdennis,

"SA have a package of services accepted as the best by our government "


This statement is false and misleading, and you know it!
---



So you have moved your position from "accepted as the best by our government" to "given the contract", quite a difference there!


How you try and change facts to suit your argument, it's so transparent,anyone can see it.

andy
07/10/2016
16:21
Hey Mucky, Then what are you talking about drones banging pegs in, You should know better if that was your job, But then it could have been before any of this technology was even thought about! You should consider before you write, but you don't so no need talk about luck!!.
bygdennis
07/10/2016
16:05
So you're not going to ask the question then bygd - just as I thought. Much of my working life was spent as a subcontractor, tendering to people such as the body set up for the Thames Estuary project, the main civils contractor for whom Aero are working at Hinkley, etc, so I suspect I know quite a bit more about the process than you, but, no matter, your mind is tightly sealed against the ingress of anything which just might cause you to think again about your investment. I hope you get lucky - you will need to.
Regards & goodbye.

muckshifter
07/10/2016
16:00
Andy, You're a Donkey, SA were given the contract so keep quiet.

Potty, SA say in a recent RNS they are working on this and other contracts so wait for the news as we all must., Another thing you were all in Hulseys corner at first, Now he is a significant holders in SA you're going the other way hoping he will sell his stake and let you lot take over.
You're a bunch of loony mercenaries but stand to learn a big lesson if things don't go your way, SA, Hulsey and holders have come out of this better than you were banking on, Should things go the way it seems they will, Not investing when you should could see you towards the back of the queue.

bygdennis
Chat Pages: Latest  236  235  234  233  232  231  230  229  228  227  226  225  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock