Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

[kemche] 05/10/2016 09:50

I can't think of a better time I could be having elsewhere! Hours of entertainment courtesy of your kind self of course.

[pilotov] 05/10/2016 09:48

Kemche - only $6 million in the last 18 months! But now they've got the contract to save London for 2.5M in 10 years - they'll be able to pay it all off in, say, 24 years?

[bygdennis] 05/10/2016 09:46

Hi kemche, It is being realised how important this technology is for the future in so many areas on land sea and air, the advantages and benefits from it are proving to be immense, SA are only just just beginning to gain as awareness grows as you know.
You have a job to do here or you would accept at least some of the improvements and progress made prove the package of services they have developed are among the best available worldwide and have the capacity to make strong gains in this growing sector.

The fund raise you keep talking about! Have you twigged yet what it could be for? They have contracts and work in progress we know about and will be paid for these and profits made, I doubt any investors will be worried about the next set of accounts being as previous,

So kemche and friends what would you lot suppose a fund raise would be for if required? It could be foolish not to If you have followed events, you should have an idea! This sector is waking up and still work to do if the potential is to be fully realised! The rewards for investing in this sector are huge and will grow for many years to come if you read up!

You can of course stay where you are with your petty arguments but many are catching on, Has there ever a better time to be here?

[kemche] 05/10/2016 09:20

What they said: they will need to raise more money.

What they do: lose vast amounts of it.

Am I right BygD?

[bygdennis] 05/10/2016 09:14

Andy, Without SA and their package of services the project wouldn't get off the ground, Now would it!!, Before you lot make any more silly remarks better you read up on what SA have and what they do.

[andy] 05/10/2016 08:17

Byg dennis,

"So you tell us then what would they be doing without SA's technology? Use boats and wellies?"


So how did they do it before drones then? Helicopters and light aircraft maybe? Satellites possibly?


AERO are a small PART of a greater project, with an INITIAl contract that MAY lead to more work, that is studying London flood defenses.

They are NOT single handedly running the project, in fact they are only confirmed for a small part with the possibility of further work in the future, which you would understand if you read the RNS properly without your rose tinted specs on.

And what are the margins for this work?

You claim to know so much about AERO, yet cannot state the margins!

How can you invest without knowing that?

Hope isn't a good investment strategy.

[bygdennis] 05/10/2016 08:04

Yes Andy, I posted the RNS. It would normally be enough but you still can't make sense of the progress being made, So you tell us then what would they be doing without SA's technology? Use boats and wellies? Keep in touch with things and you won't sound so childish.
It also shows our government believes SA have longevity with what they have developed which takes away your predictions of demise, Wake up you lot!
Andy, Yes there are others who fly drones and tendered but SA were chosen by the Government as the best

[andy] 04/10/2016 19:48

Byg Dennis,

This is what you said, and it simply isn't true!


"bygdennis4 Oct '16 - 12:02 - 2683 of 2697 0 0
Andy! Just admit you have no idea! The government, The environment agency have just awarded SA a contract to look after the flood defences of our capital London! "


AERO are part of a much bigger project, TEAM, and have an initial contract that MAY lead to more work, and MAY lead to some work for up to ten years, but they have not been entrusted with "looking after the flood defenses of London" as you state.

[bygdennis] 04/10/2016 16:47

What are you two on? Like a couple of babies squabbling about nothing in particular?
SA have a contract from the Environment agency which is a government department.
Part of a team and chosen as the best of the rest in their sector, Is this not a good recommendation!
I have posted the the RNS so why argue with me? You're just making fools of yourselves as usual.

[andy] 04/10/2016 16:04

bygdennis4 Oct '16 - 12:02 - 2683 of 2697 0 0
Andy! Just admit you have no idea! The government, The environment agency have just awarded SA a contract to look after the flood defences of our capital London! just in case you don't know.

-------

I'll be kind and just say that gives a misleading impression of the actual RNS, which clearly states they are a small part of a much larger project (TEAM), and have a small contract with the potential to increase over a period of 10 years to a maximum value of around £2,5 million.

Dennis,what are the margins on a contract such as this please?

Surely you know?

[ionlypostafterbbms] 04/10/2016 15:48

Your refusal to answer is an answer in itself.

You were lying when you claimed AERO had multiple recent contracts. We knew that.

[bygdennis] 04/10/2016 15:24

Post after! You can read RNS! And yes i agree with you about things all being great!, SA have only just sorted everything out so we've much more to look forward to!

[ionlypostafterbbms] 04/10/2016 14:18

Yeah, that's all great.

Can you please answer my very straightforward question?

byg,

You repeatedly say "SA now winning contracts" (plural).

Can you please post links for the RNses announcing these contracts (plural).

TIA.

[bygdennis] 04/10/2016 14:14

Another thing only after, You won't find me playing games predicting SPs And neither encourage nor discourage anyone here to buy or sell.
My advice has always been to research themselves and not be swayed by anyone as unless they can back it up with up to date reliable news as most of what they come out with is pure speculation and in many cases been misleading!
Now only after! Anything wrong with anything I've posted? You lot have apparently no knowledge of what Aero have or do, Nor do you keep up with this sector or what it means to the future of the world let alone any one country and can't grasp the significance of this technology, Why post if you ignore the main facts!
Because you have had only one totally negative agenda and that's to discredit SA as much as possible for whatever reason you have! possibly greed but this is very doubtful as you have had opportunities and let them pass!
So what is it you're posting here for? you may answer!
If you don't then why would anyone take any notice of what you have to say!

[pottermagic2310] 04/10/2016 14:09

BYGD.... from the latest RNS, "... we expect that the Company will require additional funding during the fourth quarter to provide working capital and support continued growth". The reason why is laid out elsewhere in the FACTS & FIGURES reported in the RNS, as below:

"Administrative expenses amounted to US$2,387,675..., a large portion of these costs continue to comprise of wages and salaries, consultancy and professional fees"... this is for just 6 months operations !!

Loss for the 6 month period was "US$2,121,986"

Additionally, "During the period the Company raised US$1,415,765 net of costs"
Cash in the Bank as of June 2016 was US$275,428 (which is approx. £212,000). This is approx. the difference between the Cash in the Bank and Admin expenses.

Therefore, the Business only survived as a result of its meagre Revenue stream + US$1,415,765 of fund raising... this is a FACT, based on reported FIGURES.

Then, post June 2016... "Strat Aero settled the final balance payable to the founders of Geocurve of £374,893" (which is approx. US$487,000)
Also, post June 2016... "share raising £370,000 pre expenses" (approx. US$485k)
So this post preiod Fund Raise paid for the Geocurve final payment !!

Admin Expenses for the currennt Quarter could be approx. US$1.2million, which is a little under £1m GBP. With new existing, recent Contracts ramping up Income a little over time(only a little, 10s of £1000s according to recent RNS') and the (feverish) pursuit of additional Business in multiple target Sectors over the coming 6 months+, this Business needs £1m per Quarter to stay in Business, so a £2m fund raise... the Funds they refer to as quoted from their own RNS above... will be about right ASSUMING they attract additional, new Business on multiple fronts each month for the next 6 months.
The Business can't survive on its existing contracted Revenue based on the operating Costs reported.
If they pull off yet another Fund raise of such significance, then I think that bodes well and will take a punt but as others suggest... who is going to step in to the tune of perhaps £2million ???

[ionlypostafterbbms] 04/10/2016 14:08

byg,

I'm aware of that UK Environment Agency contract.

What are the others you bang on about?

"provid(ing) aerial inspection and level survey services for the Environment Agency's Thames Estuary Asset Management 2100 (TEAM2100) programme" isn't the same as ""The environment agency have just awarded SA a contract to look after the flood defences of our capital London!"

Is it.

[ionlypostafterbbms] 04/10/2016 13:00

"The environment agency have just awarded SA a contract to look after the flood defences of our capital London! just in case you don't know."

That's just a bare faced lie, isn't it byg.

You are a fathoms deep underwater ramper trying to deceive people into buying this POS to prop up your bad investment.

[ionlypostafterbbms] 04/10/2016 12:56

byg,

You repeatedly say "SA now winning contracts" (plural).

Can you please post links for the RNses announcing these contracts (plural).

TIA.

[kemche] 04/10/2016 12:40

Oh yes I do! They lose money and raise funds! Am I right?

[bygdennis] 04/10/2016 12:37

Just shows how silly you all are! What's the point of taking pictures of floods after they happen? pilotov=kemche! You simply haven't a clue what SA do at all

[pilotov] 04/10/2016 12:14

That's amazing Dennis! So they're going to look after the flood defences for all of London! That is a lot of earth moving, trench digging, excavating, concreting and dam building! You are right, we know nothing - there's us thinking it was just photographing the breaches when it floods....

[kemche] 04/10/2016 12:07

"So you think the hearing will go ahead then, even though they've settled?
Who's insane kemche? What do you keep posting for?"

Did I write such a thing?

Why do I keep posting? To keep you company of course!


"You're making yourselves look more foolish every day now!". That will be us then. And not you. Of course.

[bygdennis] 04/10/2016 12:02

Andy! Just admit you have no idea! The government, The environment agency have just awarded SA a contract to look after the flood defences of our capital London! just in case you don't know.
On what basis then do you think they awarded SA the contract then! if they are not the best equipped to deal with this very important task. Answer Andy!! Please!
You lot at the moment are in a world of your own as is your self predicted consensus.

You're making yourselves look more foolish every day!