Stilo Share Discussion Threads

[mudbath] 23/8/2016 15:44

"Utilitsed across one little team within a huge massive organisation"
StiloLosses,you forget to add "Fact !",so does that mean its



My open source is taken from Mike Iantosca's presentation,specifically slides 15 through 17.(what's yours ?)

Cheers.

[stilolosses] 23/8/2016 14:49

Absolutely. Utilised fully across one small part of the organisation that has thousands of little teams. Utilitsed across one little team within a huge massive organisation in the same way as Migrate. Sounds wonderful in the headlines but when you read the full story you find out the truth. This is still great as it endorses Author Bridge just like Migrate before it.

[mudbath] 23/8/2016 13:21

Please see 2016 AGM statement + Mike Iantosca's June 2016 video presentation for IBM confirming the engagement.

[stilolosses] 23/8/2016 12:22

I would so much love to say IBM has rolled this out right across its organisation. They have not. I would encourage anybody to put this to the board at the next AGM and I am sure they will be more than happy to confirm that this is not the case. However, Author Bridge will slowly grow revenues nicely. Anyway, if IBM has rolled this out like one says then the revenues today just from this would rocket. They will not do this any time soon. Fact!

[clocktower] 23/8/2016 10:58

Another Migrate - give it away to IBM and live in hope sounds familiar, which is why the share price is ahead of any realistic prospects imo.

Thank you for putting the record straight as SL seems to have missed the facts based on his previous post.

[clocktower] 23/8/2016 10:58

Another Migrate - give it away to IBM and live in hope sounds familiar, which is why the share price is ahead of any realistic prospects imo.

Thank you for putting the record straight as SL seems to have missed the facts based on his previous post.

[clocktower] 23/8/2016 10:58

double post:

[mudbath] 23/8/2016 10:44

Just to put the record straight,IBM is already licensed to utilse AuthorBridge for full deployment throughout the Company and its affiliates.
Revenues will indeed now grow at an unprecedented rate,including those of a recurring nature.
It is too early to discern a median average size for potential orders,yet this is of little consequence if Stilo does indeed manage to secure further significant engagements, at entrerprise level,for AuthorBridge,with companies of a stature approaching that of IBM.

[stilolosses] 22/8/2016 12:46

Author Bridge is certainly going to do the job no matter what scale IBM decide to utilise it. Time will tell. Will revenues now grow at unprecedented levels? No they will not but they will now grow nicely. The minimum average order will be at least $15,000 for Author Bridge.

[infocusint] 20/8/2016 19:55

Mudbath
Thanks for prompt reply.

[mudbath] 20/8/2016 17:13

infocusint
There are a couple of other "authorbridge(s)" out there,apart from Stilo AuthorBridge .
Neither have any connection with Stilo International though.

[infocusint] 20/8/2016 16:47

Hi Mudbath
As wife of infocusint, I would just like to know who LORENZ authorBridge™ are. Is there a connection to Stilo?

[mudbath] 20/8/2016 13:03

IBM recently had this to say about Stilo AuthorBridge :-

"As close to free-form content editing as possible....virtually walk up and use...cloud based,completely tagless,no knowledge of DITA required,very low cost per user,suitable for mass use,especially XML resistive groups."

Their scale of impending usage of AB is immense,with thousands of users within IBM,tens of thousands outside and with over five million internal topics waiting to be addressed.
Aditionally mentioned was that every acquisition that IBM made created even further opportunities for STL technology.

The fact then that IBM have allocated US$ 3 Billion for such acquisitions is very exciting(imo).

Apart from IBM,CEO Les Burnham envisages further enterprise level engagements with large global corporates.

In the event of AuthorBridge becoming establishing as must have industry standard software,
then the current STL market cap of £8 million would become a distant memory.

It possibly wont all happen overnight(tell me about it);yet,as AuthorBridge was only launched a few months ago,its early progress is proving notably dynamic.

[baa] 18/8/2016 18:05

indeed mud - imagine what a business with a big corporate sales approach could do with it...be fascinating to know what the order position is & how much info they give us when reporting..

[pj 1] 18/8/2016 18:00

Thanks janeanne although if it doubles from here then I wasn't too late!

mudbath-I set a stop previously and it got hit. That was the plan at the time, and stops have protected me on other shares so I'm not going to beat myself up that STL has nearly doubled since :-0

[mudbath] 18/8/2016 17:51

Indeed it is Soupdragon55

[soupdragon55] 18/8/2016 17:19

And isn't that just Authorbridge?

[mudbath] 18/8/2016 17:16

Just a must.
Thanks baa.
(200 wouldn't be all bad=£600k)

[baa] 18/8/2016 17:10

thanks mud - my point is that 200 won't do and the value of the business is going to be driven , in a linear fashion , by the volume they can sell . At 200 , the mkt cap should still rise , but not exponetially

To me , 1000 similarly sized users paying c£3000pa should be perfectly reasonable on a worldwide basis , but the execution of how they get there with IBM help unknown. That's the key question.

My numbers reflect what I've seen of pricing - you might know more.

I agree - at 1000 , the mkt cap would be a multiple & not impossible given it's a £3k product. Not a huge software investment for most businesses.

[mudbath] 18/8/2016 16:38

I would take you up on that baa;for even 1,000 similar sized licence sales would generate,on your figures, an annual net profit of £2.7 million,which,on an undemanding p/e ratio of 20 would suggest a share price some 10 times higher that its current level.
We will hopefully obtain guidance on Sept 1st.
All imo,btw.

[janeann] 18/8/2016 16:37

welcome back PJ - slightly late to the party but better late than not at all!

[baa] 18/8/2016 16:19

The order from the US NRC is promising. Might be worth say £3000pa , but the gross margin could be 90%+ of that.

The pricing is so small that they need literally thousands of similar organisations to contract. The pricing structure will be vindicated if they reach thousands quickly - it's arguably too cheap if they don't.

Good luck to them...

[pj 1] 18/8/2016 14:28

I've bought back in, although very small.