We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solgold Plc | LSE:SOLG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0WD0R35 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.27 | 3.10% | 8.99 | 8.95 | 8.99 | 9.00 | 8.69 | 9.00 | 1,432,379 | 15:56:14 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 3.9M | -50.34M | -0.0168 | -5.17 | 260.8M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
18/2/2017 08:07 | Friday, February 17, 2017 Solgold - Hole 19 DISCLOSURE: I own shares in SolGold We got partial assays from hole 19 at Alpala, let us see what that it shows and does to the official bad (tm) resource calculations. Summary My predictions were very average My officially bad resources have gone up Copper 15% to 320Mt @ 0.54% Cu or 6.4Blbs contained copper Gold 10% to 299Mt @ 0.56 g/t Au or 5.3Moz Au In an earlier post I made some predictions about future drill results, for hole 19 they were: 0.5% Cu and 0.6 g/t Au from 325.6 to 1161.5m including ~0.6-0.8% Cu and ~1 g/t Au from 850 to 1161.5m 325.6 to 850 will run around 0.4% Cu and 0.35 g/t Au What was reported was: And this is what it looks like in technicolor Zoomed in - Cu (right) - green zone starts at 572m depth So they actually hit economic mineralization from 572m depth. I'm ignoring the stuff higher up as it is only grading 0.18% Cu and 0.09 g/t Au, which isn't what you would call well mineralized! We can also see that and even though the assays at depth are pending, the hole seems leave mineralization at 1374m. However, you can clearly see the very high grade zones (>1% Cu and >1g/t Au) hit in adjacent holes doesn't seem to occur in hole 19. We have 2 options here: The zone does exist in hole 19, but is much narrower and hasn't been separated in the summary assay table The very high grade mineralization is small, and restricted to specific zones. So my prediction was wrong, which sucks, and mineralization appears to be ~200m deeper than originally thought, but i did do a better job at guessing estimating (that sounds more professional) the higher grade zone - I got the start depth correct, but it is ~200m thicker than I thought. I'm also going to give myself some marks for getting the copper grades correct, but I over estimated the gold content. I'm going to give myself a 4/10. Must try harder.... So what does it do to the resources? Here are the updated numbers. Copper Gold Another 10-15% increase in contained copper and gold, and it seems that we have squeezed over the magical 5 Moz contained gold, which is very nice. For this I've used the following parameters: Specific Gravity = 2.7 A NW-SE trend on mineralization - this appears to be similar to that being used by SolGold in their presentation. 200m search (i.e. Leapfrog connects intervals that are within 200m from one another) this is comfortable for an 'inferred' resource. You can download the leapfrog model and spreadsheet from here (link) Exploration upside I've decided to have a closer look at the data to see what upside there is at Alpala. red dashed line = my estimate to the limits of mineralization - think of it as a >0.5% CuEq grade shell We can see that hole 13-003 was drilled over the main mineralized zone, and hole 19 is extending this zone (albeit in small systematic steps) to the SE. We can also see that the grade drops off to depth. This is suggesting the holes are entering the high temperature core of the system, where it is too hot to precipitate copper minerals. Here is an annotated version of figure 4 that accompanied the latest PR (link). cyan - where I think the holes being drilled will go; green - holes I would like to see SolGold drill As Solgold are drilling some very deep drill-holes, we can see that they are not following the planned direction (this is called deviation and is caused by a number of factors - long holes deviate more than short holes). What it seems to show that the 2 holes being drilled at the moment (20, and 21) won't hit their planned targets and: Hole 20 - will probably hit the high grade zones intercepted by holes 08, 14, and 18 - it will give good numbers but not significantly change the size of the deposit Hole 21 - that will intersect the same zone hit by hole 19, just 30-50m south of it. I've drawn a number of green lines on the figure above, these are hypothetical holes that I would like to see drilled (but then again, drawing lines on a map in an air-conditioned office is easy), but it would test some areas where the mineralization is open (especially the zones hit by hole 07 and 17), and change Alpala from a large into a very large deposit. -- As ever, you need to click the link to see the diagrams etc but Angry Geologist does provide those with limited knowledge of all things geological with a clear analysis of what we have Looking good | mirabeau | |
17/2/2017 15:09 | EXCELLENT FIND Miraubeau | hazl | |
17/2/2017 13:02 | Mining Capital's Alastair Ford talks to Proactive's Andrew Scott about Donald Trump overturning a law preventing companies dumping coal mining debris in streams and rivers. Ford also discusses suspicions that major miners could be tipped to hit the acquisition trail. Citing the likes of SolGold plc (LON:SOLG) and Kincora Copper Ltd (CVE:KCC) Ford says ''straws in the wind are now appearing and value is being created on a significant scale again.'' ''What’s changed is that big money is once again taking an interest''. Thanks to 'The Italian' on L-S-E It's a video interview so to see it you must go onto that site ADVFN disapproves of! Pro_Acteev | mirabeau | |
17/2/2017 11:33 | Haha you spoke to soon maybe??? Where's kevin | spacedust | |
17/2/2017 10:00 | What a pleasure that we are all in agreement. Happy Days. | mam fach | |
17/2/2017 09:54 | Be interesting to test the theory Bill. Anyway this seems hot along with gold stocks generally. IM0 | hazl | |
17/2/2017 09:18 | Indeed .. happy to consolidate here for a week or two which will sustain the next move up assuming good news continues. | onedayrodders | |
17/2/2017 08:54 | We simply don't know. Something is keeping price up. Happy to see this keeping within 39p-40p range. | mam fach | |
17/2/2017 00:06 | We will see!!! but tbh dont really care as we are now at 40p | billthebank | |
16/2/2017 23:23 | Signal RNS on the way ? | mam fach | |
16/2/2017 21:58 | A signal from one mm to another | spacedust | |
16/2/2017 19:00 | Why does that mean that? | markth126 | |
16/2/2017 18:07 | Looks like a few 1 share transactions today guys. Hopefully great news tomorrow | billthebank | |
16/2/2017 16:56 | Perhaps time for a new thread then ? ...any volunteers ;o) | onedayrodders | |
16/2/2017 16:14 | ODR - That headline dates from years ago when Solg was targeting the Pacific 'Ring of Fire' where there are a few 40Moz discoveries. It never found much - hence the move to the Andes | dozyduck | |
16/2/2017 15:10 | What are the latest projections for gold reserves I can see on the header 40m ounces. | onedayrodders | |
16/2/2017 15:08 | Perhaps a new floor in the share price quietly taking place. | onedayrodders | |
16/2/2017 09:44 | SOLG plenty of GOLD IMO | hazl | |
16/2/2017 09:30 | Took my last chunk off the table.. UEN up 40% now in 2 days and I cant miss that one... Good luck all holders.. | gregpeck7 | |
16/2/2017 08:40 | mirabeau Thanks for taking the initiative. Indeed it was a helpful response and I think this statement is very true and works in the general sense as well! shows 'the need for industry experts working as analysts'. | hazl | |
15/2/2017 20:03 | You bet. Quite a wobble today. Scare tactics IMHO. We'll find out tomorrow. Are we wise to hold or seriously delusional ? | mam fach | |
15/2/2017 19:20 | Is this the start of the next leg up | spacedust |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions