Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[oldnotwise] 17/9/2017 19:23

Inanaco
I won't start a spat about your personal situation.
What I will say is is that things seem to have changed from some sources and there's a rather distasteful attempt to "Rewrite History" here.
Remember all the posters who extolled the " go all in" "free money" and "Rat Tat Tat" nonsense?
Then have a think about some others who mentioned the potential problems of such a "Risk" strategy.
THEN think of some who've switched alliances and now say that the original Gung Ho stuff was bad...
Stated investment policies have changed radically from some posters, but some have stayed true to their originally stated views. Those who have attempted to change what actually unfolded need to look inward and maybe sit around and quieten down a bit.
AIMO
ATB

[inanaco] 17/9/2017 19:15

Wig ... no idea .. you can never take the Moral High Road ... when talking about buying and selling, in shares as The last in, will always lose in a falling market.

[inanaco] 17/9/2017 19:11

ONW ... I started at 8p .. problem that consumes Loz, he conveniently forgets i hold a commercial property estate, which every body knew about back in 2013, thus i may have moved all funds into Scancell from my share account, but that's only 5% of investment assets, his problem is being selective in what he posts. Which is way i always try and find the posts concerned,

Loz has only ever averaged down....... or traded out at a loss

[inanaco] 17/9/2017 19:04

Bit of maths ... and risk
Averaging down is plausible, actually you can use Ivy's post .. £10,000 at .3 share price profit thus his first buy at approx .75 (2 year sp) and his buying at the lows at .0975 to achieve an average of .2
indicates approx 5.35 ratio ... thus he must have bought £3750 first time, on the second buy, £16250
to take his capital cost to £20,000 to profit £10,000 (.2p to .3p rise)
When its laid out like that .. it gets interesting as you can see the huge disparity in risk in trying to save £3750 initial investment ..

[wigwammer] 17/9/2017 19:01

"but he didn't he had to trade down from a high average.."Interesting.So where does the "astute" bit come in?

[oldnotwise] 17/9/2017 18:57

Well... remember all the taunts about my sale at 27p (which was an inaccurate level but for this purpose I'll accept that price)?
That approach cost me CGT but that's one of the few taxes I'm happy to pay if it's unavoidable.
My original strategy was to hold my original investment..... but when it's possible to sell and retain a holding subsidised by profit (the illusive "free shares" strategy) then I took it and have the option to rebuild if I wish, or trade if the options present themselves.
The core holding I had after the "27p sale" is what I will retain as my "in to the end" so that adjusted my "buy and hold" because (as I posted on many occasions) I had invested above my theoretical self imposed limit in the first place.
I really shouldn't have bought more than my original value limit, but I did (and posted that I had) but with hindsight I'm pleased I did.
However, even if I don't agree with an "all in" approach it's not for me to decide whether it's stupid or not for other people.
All in my opinion
ATB

[the real lozan] 17/9/2017 18:54

The DIFFERENCE is TEA LEAF
I wasn't deliberately DECIEVING anyone =
YOU = were / are

[chelsea35] 17/9/2017 18:36

Looking back i am sure that occurred. Mind it wont be just inanaco that has ever done that.

[chelsea35] 17/9/2017 18:09

I can understand that, and worked up to the point where it momentarily hit 64p. But without trading it, and sinking back to 10p, how can that be a good stratagy?? Sure it is one of those we have discussed many times, buy many of us who bought in late 30s early 40s could only really take a loss, or average down as we continued to hit new lows.

[oldnotwise] 17/9/2017 17:55

C7... Actually a buy and hold strategy isn't necessarily stupid....
It depends on entry levels and the amount of funds proportionally invested vis a vis the portfolio total. Also the acceptable level of risk to the investor will dictate the amount of funds invested either in sectorial or individual terms.
An "all in" investment policy might be acceptable to some in terms of an "investment strategy" and some might say that THAT is stupid, but buy and hold stupid?.... not necessarily IMO.
ATB

[chelsea35] 17/9/2017 15:57

drd. I am lucky, my best pal has signed me in on his sky go, so i have free use of it on my PC and subscribe for my broadband and football on BT for £56 a month. Costs more too go to the pub and watch it, which i never did, i like to watch it alone.
Not so good today, a 0-0 draw.

Not bothered by him, he lied again Friday over having his posts removed, tried in vain to accuse me of deramping. Desperate measures for desperate folks. And a stupid buy/hold stratagy that has been PROVEN to have FAILED. Oh well, catch yer tomorrow.

[kreature] 17/9/2017 02:42

Still no cure then ? Just a load of mumbo jumbo data and a grinning idiot ?

[supernumerary] 16/9/2017 12:25

"With this finding of NLRC5 as an important biomarker for cancer, we can ultimately predict how long cancer patients can survive and how well cancer treatments might work for them," Kobayashi said. It might be especially relevant for melanoma patients, both because the NLRC5 mutation rate is relatively high and because its levels of expression are highly predictive of survival for that cancer type."

Given the limited numbers in the SCIB1 trial, it might be worth sclp reviewing this marker to check for patient bias.

[drdobson] 16/9/2017 12:12

Must be all that relaxing on the Terrace that gives Liz his wit and repartit.
It can be lonely out here and nice to have some polite well mannered discussions without going OTT like some.
Do you live in Chelsea or just support them

[chelsea35] 16/9/2017 12:06

Thanks drd, very good advice, you have a great day. Enjoyed Lozs post too, theres a turn up for the books!!!

[drdobson] 16/9/2017 11:01

C35 Re your 11733 and Loz witty posting.Post recommended
I presume Nana the Luddite is from Ilfracome ha ha.
Perhaps the THAI KOK will help us out with the translation.
More a fish and chip man myself but appreciate Loz being much classier than me will be a Moulw & Frites man whereas Nana likely be a HOT DOG with ketchup and candy floss guy.
Enjoy the view from the Terrace Loz and hope you are are feeling well C35.Understand you you do not enjoy he best of health so spend your time watching your BOYOs and not teplying to the TRYPE HOUND

[the real lozan] 15/9/2017 15:41

Early editions of the Inanacombe Daily Liar -weekly newspaper - headline with the report of a 'visit' to Inanacombe, of a delegation representing the Thai Tourist Board
The delegation arrived in Inanacombe, in an 'effort to explain' = WHY there has been such a 'Drmatic, Sudden, Devastating DROP' in Thai tourism,this week.
Using a local Thai speaker as 'interpreter', the leader of the THAI delegation said =
"WE think we CAN now, shed a little light on our problems. "
Adding, "We have an old saying in Thailand...Which in THAI is =
" Wee no akok wenwe cee won "
.
Watch out for later editions

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 15:16

I gave you an exit ..... you just did not take it.

SCLPRE: 1.8 mill tradeToday 11:22
C7 if you agree with Roses can you explain what a transfer of share is ?

really C7 if i give you the hint ... just take it next time ... but that is up to you

[chelsea35] 15/9/2017 15:05

Nasty piece of work.

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 15:04

you have lost me .... why would that influence Scancell ?

Tantrum ??? lost me again .

[chelsea35] 15/9/2017 14:47

Inanaco, well you have sunk even further today. Didn"t think it was possible, from one tantrum into another with Ivy. Pathetic. Was it the Bavarian Nordic news that you were trying to divert from?

hxxps://endpts.com/kerrisdale-2-0-this-week-bavarian-nordic-cancer-vaccine-is-a-bust-in-phiii/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Friday%20September%2015%202017&utm_content=Friday%20September%2015%202017+CID_3ce8bd35a974e4526740de3c4ea8cec5&utm_source=ENDPOINTS%20emails&utm_term=Kerrisdale%202-0%20this%20week%20Bavarian%20Nordics%20cancer%20vaccine%20is%20a%20bust%20in%20PhIII