Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 14:25

its multi terraced ..

[drdobson] 11/9/2017 14:22

Sounds lovely Loz.Is it a Chateau?

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 14:03

sounds big 100 sq ft ... 16ft by 6ft don't fancy fitting that, or indeed paying for the crane to lift it ..at 10mm double glazed = 455 KG ... however France has been metric since 1801 ....

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 13:46

Your the expert,

[the real lozan] 11/9/2017 13:44

Would like to spend all day 'shackled to these forums as Naner is', but must press-on and prepare for ' extended family visit' to us here in S W France.
Mrs. Lozan's sister {One of} and my brother-in-law, have requested they would prefer to 'sleep' in the 'Morning Room'... so as to "enjoy waking up to the sun 'beaming-in' through the 100 sq. ft. picture {esque} window therein.
Naner has asked me to provide pictures of our 'domain'.... which,to 'selected folks' -I already have... Albeit, for my part, on a 'Wish to Know basis'.
It will come as no surprise to 'folks', that Naner = 'Does not qualify'.

[drdobson] 11/9/2017 13:43

It was an INTERIM raise so SURELY MORE is needed to do ALL the trials.
Yes OVER subscribed BUT as has been pointed out by ASTUTE many of these institutions will simply FLIP there shares making a NICE profit.

That is why it went DOWN to 10p due to SELLER and everyone ELSE in CITY knew about the PLACING except for NANA.

That is why ASTUTE BUY at 10p and sell,at 16p and WAIT for next PLACING at 7p and laugh at NANA losing lots of money.

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 13:34

actually its not an issue, after all the last one was over subscribed

[drdobson] 11/9/2017 13:20

Of course FUNDING is an issue. Only NANA does NOT see this.
LOZ asks a simple question that NANA who can't answer IGNORES or like a Parrott finding a new word " Crypto Babble" keeps on REpeating.
WHEN will NANA realise he is OUT of touch,OUT of his depth in debating with Loz and OUT of his mind due to SUPERIOR brain power from the ASTUTE

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 13:01

crypto-babble

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 12:23

trying to work out your Crypto-babble

"funding is needed"

"FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here"

maybe you should include the rest of the post ? as it was about raising funds ... not that we did not need funds.

[the real lozan] 11/9/2017 11:36

So, The "DERANGED, Incoherent, Pipe-Snapper" now AGREES with an 'intelligently put post' { following my PROMPTING to do so }, which clearly STATES =
" Funding will clearly need to be forthcoming in order to progress SCIB and MODI.
At this stage, we do not know HOW the funding will be achieved."
AND
Then, tries to 'SNEAK-IN' with - "Funding will clearly need to be forthcoming in order to progress SCIB and MODI.
At this stage, we do not know HOW the funding will be achieved."
.
AFTER PREVIOUSLY trying to CLAIM = "FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here"
.
YOU see the 'ANOMALY' here ???

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 11:21

Loz ... there can only be one view... funding is needed, how we get there is subject to RNS ... however you could ask at the AGM ..lol

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 11:09

Gazza

I also agree ...

[the real lozan] 11/9/2017 11:07

Gash =
"There, that is my opinion, get the idea?"
.
Indeed, I DO know what "an opinion" is.
However, it is 'refreshing'to see 'opinions' expressed... other than 'The ONE view ONLY' trHYPE format.

[agema] 11/9/2017 11:02

Gazza

Yes. I would pretty much agree with your opinion.

[gazza] 11/9/2017 10:58

Lozan, your 11494.
I was hoping for a bit more as a "comment" -

verb: comment;
1. express an opinion or reaction in speech or writing.

You haven't expressed an opion, merely written a single word in capitals.

Please allow me to give you my opinion:

Funding will clearly need to be forthcoming in order to progress SCIB and MODI.
At this stage, we do not know HOW the funding will be achieved.
The risk of NOT getting funding is LOW (even agema stated this last week). Why do I say this:
If you consider the papers, posters and RNS releases you get the impression that what SCLP have is far too valuable not to get the funding needed.
Of course, the other dirty word is "dilution". In my opinion, any dilution incurred by funding will be more than compensated by the eventual enhanced value of the company both in the short term (as uncertainty has been removed) and long term (as potential value can be achieved.

There, that is my opinion, get the idea?
AIMHO

[the real lozan] 11/9/2017 10:49

How 'charming' of the "Deranged, Incoherent, Pipe-Snapper" to drop by.

[inanaco] 11/9/2017 10:38

Crypto-babble ..... love it

Funding ... Pension ? water Bill ?

not sure you can get pay day loans Loz ..

still about, but as Boom already spotted the website update and we discussed it yesterday, I hardly want to play your "Game of Parrots" ..

[gazza] 11/9/2017 10:18

Obviously you were. When you said "this mornings post" I was looking for something posted this morning. Unfortunately your crypto-babble is lost on most normal folk. Perhaps you would care to comment on the rns or on SCLP (in English)

[chelsea35] 11/9/2017 09:50

What a weird reaction to a very good RNS. Just one comment from Botski for Torquay Fan to copy.
Lost me there Loz, whose fire are you STOKEing?

[gazza] 11/9/2017 09:42

Has it been removed?

[the real lozan] 11/9/2017 08:31

Many observers of this particular site will be 'heartened' to see, that 'this mornings post' by inaner-cur is =
The most ACCURATE, REALIABLE, FAIR APPRAISAL of the REALITY of the situation here... for many a year.