Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[leluot3] 22/2/2017 16:22

Well done to the Blinkx family!

After 9 long years the share price is back where it started!

Great stock selecting

[leluot3] 22/2/2017 15:58

Good try Barkpooooooooooooo

Try telling the folks here why your 240p company is in fact for sale at 37.5p

What a sorry existence

Just a thought of course

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 13:41

Criteo SA (ADR) (CRTO) Releases Earnings Results, Beats Expectations By $0.16 EPS

"it had a profit of $0.84 Earnings per Share for the quarter. The results exceeded Wall Street expectations beating the analyst consensus estimate by $0.16. Analysts had a consensus of $0.68."

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 13:38

Hot on the heels of Rocket Fuel...
Criteo Reports Strong Results For The Fourth Quarter And Fiscal Year 2016

~63% of revenue in Q4 generated on mobile ads..


Operating Highlights

We added close to 1,600 net clients in Q4 including Criteo Sponsored products, surpassing 14,400 clients.

Revenue ex-TAC from existing clients, live in Q4 2015 and still live in Q4 2016, grew 20% at constant currency, demonstrating our ability to drive revenue expansion within our customer base.

Close to 63% of our Revenue ex-TAC in Q4 excluding Criteo Sponsored Products was generated on mobile ads.

Users matched through our Universal Match technology generated 60% of Revenue ex-TAC, reflecting the growing adoption of our solution and the high value of matched users for advertisers.

On October 25, 2016, we launched Criteo Predictive Search, a groundbreaking product that brings our proven performance-based approach to the large and fast-growing Google Shopping market.

[jarvis4] 22/2/2017 13:03

R1 are clearly a different animal to the old BLNX, but their marketplace has also changed beyond recognition. Two things which I view as key are the ad world's attitude and reaction to adblockers and fraud. R1 has the benefit of the old BLNX IDOL patent protected software which may well be giving an advantage.
Nobody except Tosca themselves knows their game plan here, but I am heartened that in this period of clear improvement for R1, Tosca have not shown any desire to go above 29%. Also, although I too have my concerns about the Perk acquisition before proven (non EBITDA) profitability, I again take comfort from the fact that this would not have even been contemplated without the nod from Tosca.
The FY 2017 figures will not, in my view, be startling but, hopefully there will be sufficient meat there to generate some excitement. If there is we then just have to hope that Brian, with his somewhat loose acquaintance with how to construct an erudite sentence, does not strangle such excitement at birth.

[kendonagasaki] 22/2/2017 12:46

As you say Alex, they have cash to keep paying themselves for a couple of years yet!EBITDA is not going to cut it with me.Could be another 12-18 months and they could be bought out by then on the cheap.Brian will get his 52p options and will proably still be in charge.Danger is taking this private by Tosca to refloat at a higher price.Brian doesn't seem keen on raising the sp? We need a huge of 'clarlity' here.They shouldnt be struggling to turn a profit here.....but they seem to be. £2.40 is just plain stupid, just like Barky.

[alex1621] 22/2/2017 11:54

STT ... I'm not going anywhere ... it's my civic duty to act as a counter balance to "scaffolders", £2.40, and other such nonsense spouted on here ... so where are we?- R1 recovered well in 2016, the programmatic platform building volume.- R1 appear to be as clean as they can be, a lesson learned from the past.- R1 numbers have improved but not sufficiently to achieve a positive cash generation, at least not yet.- Board have promised adj EBITDA profitability in 2017, not a measure I rate but if they do it at least shows progress.- Perk acquisition is in my view a concern, I'm not that happy about it.- R1 still retain sufficient cash to keep in business for a few years, so still have time on cash generation.Any views on when R1 will be cash generating and EPS profitable?

[alex1621] 22/2/2017 11:44

Note the "2016 has been transformational" ... mmm, heard that before.

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 11:29

Rocket Fuel drops 10% on Lower Q1 View

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 11:28

Rocket Fuel Logged 97% Revenue Growth For Platforms Business In '16

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 11:27

Rocket Fuel Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016


Company Generates $21 Million in Operating Cash Flow and $4.6 Million in Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow in the Full Year

[sikhthetech] 22/2/2017 11:22

gl,
best to dyor, look at risk/reward and only ever invest money you can afford to lose...

after all, if someone knocked on your door telling you about a great investment where industry leading scaffolders are invested, would anyone hand over thousands of pounds without asking any questions???



absolutely Alex is a good poster and makes some good points, might be why the gang try and bully him off - I hope he stays..

[barkboo] 22/2/2017 08:35

Gowlane - unusual for you to pop over with your Scampi.. We are not hungry my friend!

[barkboo] 22/2/2017 08:33

My guess is - there is fresh interest in this stock compounded with Tosca catching up on the Perk deal dilution.........MM's have a dilemma!

Trading update pencilled for April 11th - at a guess?

Yes - be prepared for some frantic behaviour from the market makers, up until that date. The PI's have given the big boys a run for their money here....it has been pleasing to see how strong the family have been.

Not long now guys!

[gowlane] 22/2/2017 08:30

don't know what all the fuss is about, I must confess I ticked up 1gw's poll for a bit of fun, I imagine most tick-ups were from genuine posters like me

And of course Alex is one of the few posters to talk sense about this share, ignore him at your peril

[precinct14] 22/2/2017 08:04

hahahahahahahahaha!!! Great post kendo!!

[kendonagasaki] 22/2/2017 07:43

gehe is a gimp!

[jwoolley] 22/2/2017 05:55

1gw....You presume a lot as well don't you. I was generalising by stating "You are so naive 1gw" of which you clearly are.

[geheimnis2] 21/2/2017 22:37

Give it a rest 1gw

Buffoon.

[1gw] 21/2/2017 22:28

Oh this is getting beyond ridiculous. Read post 801 and/or 805 again STT, that's where your apparent fibs are documented. It's nothing to do with whether multi ids exist, it's to do with whether multi-id votes are counted for "top posts" purposes.

[sikhthetech] 21/2/2017 21:53

jw, absolutely, I too think 1gw is very naive...

he can see my posts on Pace... I've been posting on various shares for years... and blnx for years and have seen the tactics used by the gang, again and again.... similar on gkp, gbo, moni, mos, xel, avn etc, etc...

funny how multiple ids were used on Adventis as well...

divide and conquer..
control..
credibility..
my friend
trust me
rinse and spin...

honest guv...

[geheimnis2] 21/2/2017 21:31

^^^^ liar.

[sikhthetech] 21/2/2017 21:25

1gw, where's the blatant fib????

you've got one post of yours which didn't appear in top posts but you claim that was credible evidence, of what??? you then carried out a so called experiment where multi id posters upped your post and it appears in top, so it provides 'conclusive proof'... of what???? that multiple ids exist, I've been saying that for years...
and that leads you to prove that I'm caught out lying???? really??? how so??.



Now let's take another RECENT post...

Loaf's post which APPEARED IN TOP posts.... oh look 14 votes...similar to Barky's recent post, odd that!!!


loafofbread27 Jan '17 - 23:37 - 2958 of 3251 14 1 (premium)
Sikh



I posted questioning multi ids..


sikhthetech28 Jan '17 - 14:03 - 2965 of 3251 1 1 Edit
It's funny how Loaf's post voting shot up from 3 to 7 within mins.. ;-)

sikhthetech28 Jan '17 - 14:12 - 2967 of 3251 1 1 Edit
lol... all at the same time and all noticed Loaf's post, from LAST night, today at the same time... yea, right, honest guv...
hope no one has multiple devices open... lol


you posted suggesting multi ids don't exist..and asked if others wanted to own up and put my mind at rest... DID ANYONE ELSE OWN UP TO VOTING UP.... NO..


1gw28 Jan '17 - 15:43 - 2968 of 3251 12 1 Moderate | Ban
Well I think I'm one of the ones who voted up loaf's post recently (and from memory when it was showing 3 other votes up). Does anyone else want to own up to put stt's mind at rest?
<...>




Your experiment proved my point that multiple ids do exist and are used, which is something I have been saying for years......so by now accepting that multi ids exist, you are now contradicting yourself from your post above, aren't you...
ARE YOU GOING TO ACCEPT THAT YOU WERE WRONG IN YOUR ASSERTION THAT MULTI IDS WERE NOT USED IN VOTING UP LOAF'S post????
or where you telling fibs???