Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Randstad Hldgs LSE:RAND London Ordinary Share NL0000379121 EUR 0.1
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00 € - - - - - - - - -
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
- - - - 0.00

Randstad Hldgs Share Discussion Threads

Showing 51 to 72 of 75 messages
Chat Pages: 3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/1/2016
20:01
is it time to buy this smelly dog?
albanyvillas
05/1/2009
22:18
22 random trades again today. A very dark day for the Randominator today, the perfect storm of bad trades. The first 3 trades (all different forex instruments) amazingly all filled just before market open at midnight. Just amazing that each should fill and not exit but there you go. Will post more later after some analysis of the days events... 22 trades 18 winning : +180 points 4 still open from today, 1 from a couple of days ago: -1232 points (!!!!) Randominator Stats as of 22:00 5th January =========================================== 279 trades since 3rd December (21 trading days) 269 winning (2690 points) 5 losing (-750 points) 5 still open : -1232 points (!!!!) Overall P/L = 708 points Winning% = 96.5% (?)
hoobie
02/1/2009
21:21
22 random trades today. That BIG loser that I mentioned yesterday, "due any time" now just happened. Maybe self-fulfilling because I let the DOW short from the 31st (overnight low of the day) run today when by rights I should have closed it at open when it jumped >1% from entry point. I'll explain the latest thinking on stops at some point in the not too distant. It's related to overall P/L *since* a given trade is entered. Bad boy 330 point loser (still open) - still up on last two days trading though so quite suprised. 22 winning : +220 points 1 still open : -330(dow from 8:35am 31/12/08 at 8661) Randominator Stats as of 21:15 2nd January =========================================== 257 trades since 3rd December (20 trading days) 251 winning (2510 points) 5 losing (-750 points) 1 open (-330 points) !! Overall P/L = 1430 points Winning% = 98%
hoobie
01/1/2009
00:27
HAPPY NEW YEAR ONE AND ALL!! ============================ 19 random trades today. Managed to close that stuck long overnight at profit target who'd have thought it. That means we've had well over a hundred trades now without a loser! And that means we're due a BIG loser any time now. 17 winning : +170 points 2 still open : -30 points (gbpusd) and -30 (dow) Randominator Stats as of 22:00 31st December =========================================== 235 trades since 3rd December (19 trading days) 228 winning (2280 points) 5 losing (-750 points) 2 open (-60 points) Overall P/L = 1470 points Winning% = 98%
hoobie
01/1/2009
00:26
Stats up to 30th December to go here.
hoobie
01/1/2009
00:26
Daily stats from the Randominator experiment The experiment started on the 3rd December 2008
hoobie
08/5/2003
08:51
That's an interesting one, bv. I've saved it for further study.
r.dryden
07/5/2003
23:44
More thoughts on the futility of forecasting where the market is going. http://www.tradinggame.com.au/articles/article.asp?i=6
r.dryden
07/5/2003
12:15
this indicator is very good, atleast you get on the right side of the market, which is more than i am at the moment http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=$NYSI,uu[h,a]daclynay[pb3][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G
big vern
11/3/2003
13:22
try this: http://www.advfn.com/cmn/fbb/thread.php3?id=1623214 ... and scroll down
energyi
10/3/2003
11:39
Help any idea where I can get these charts from ? Nothing on futuresource.com BV
big vern
27/10/2002
14:52
deltablues- I think the author of the article was just trying to show that winning is not the most important part of trading. By cutting your profits and running your losses you can have a very high percentage of winners but you will not make any money, especially after costs are added. The system with random entry and cut losses/run profits money management was just a bit of fun to try to demonstrate that you still need and edge in the first place for the money management to work. I think there is a natural tendency to try to win all the time as people are instinctively competitive. However, in trading this not always the best approach. The most important thing to look after is your equity curve and hence, money management and risk control. A good book on this subject is "Beyond Technical Analysis" by T.Chande which looks at portfolio construction and money management with multiple trading systems.
squeeze
27/10/2002
13:49
DCB, is peace of mind a good thing in a trader? Often the best trades are the ones that are hardest to make (like buying near the recent market lows), while the comfortable trades are usually wrong (eg taking profits too quickly). Or is this missing the point again? squeeze, thanks for your work on this. Maybe that bit of code was a copying error by the author or something as that particular trading system seems to be based on novice trading - buy at random, close each trade as soon as it shows a profit but cling onto losers like grim death, etc. Not that I've ever done anything like that, of course...
deltablues
26/10/2002
23:45
I suspect that the random trading approach .i.e. applying a random decision process to a mostly random price variable, is probably conceptually flawed. It feels a little like changing your number each week whilst playing the lottery. For instance if you choose the same number your probability of winning is about 1 in 14 million. However, if you randomly select a number each week your chance of success is now 1 in 1.96e14 and so you are much worse off. (lurking statisticians please feel free to comment) A further problem is how to verify results with random trading. You can add all sorts indicators and tweaks but are any improvements due to the modifications are just the result of chance? At least "random system" is another addition to the list of oxymorons
squeeze
26/10/2002
23:26
Money management . I have a system. Ask me, then do the opposit, I am wrong more times than right, so you win. :-)
zenbudd
26/10/2002
13:38
Scrip- Yes your right. Obviously drank too much beer last night.
squeeze
26/10/2002
13:06
I think perhaps people are slightly missing the point of the work described in the first post. Nobody in his right mind would pick trades on the basis of a flipped coin. For psychological peace of mind, we must all feel that the way we are picking our trades gives us an edge. Whether it does or not depends on skill. What Tolsonogov demonstrated in his first paper was that having a majority of winning trades does not guarantee long term profitability. He is right. What he is saying is that using a system of money and risk management will benefit the bottom line. He is right again. dcb
dead cat bounce
26/10/2002
12:26
Squeeze, Error in context, there is no dependancy between draws so which numbers you choose are completely irrelevant. http://www.probabilitytheory.info
scripophilist
25/10/2002
23:45
The problem is whether you can be bothered to participate in the money management system required - i.e. to take lots of small losses and small stopped-out gains while awaiting the 'big move'. Is it worth all the effort? It's not 'stress' or 'risk' that concerns me here - these are 'controlled' one way or another - just the size of reward you can reasonably expect to get from a reasonable size of 'pot' when you could be doing other things with your life. Sorry - Feeling a bit philosophical today.
analyst
25/10/2002
23:36
squeeze, does that include the correction mentioned in post 18? Also, there's a different number of trades in each simulation, which makes it a bit difficult to compare. There's enough to show that the system isn't any good, though - the average profit is much smaller than the average loss and the maximum drawdown is almost ten times the maximum profit. If you suffered the maximum drawdown, it would take nearly 200 average winning trades, with no losers, to get it back! It's also an excellent illustration of how much difference trading costs can make to a trading system. Add in the effects of "slippage" (delays in sending the order and bad fills - breakout systems are particularly prone to this) and it gets even worse.
deltablues
25/10/2002
23:27
But if we have a random system wouldn't that mean we could just do away with all that thinking and emotion and just get on with it? The author seemed to be making the point that the emotion and thinking was producing a random method anyway! So it seems that all we have to do is come up with ANY system and trade it using good money management (and without emotion or thinking). Rules I have heard mentioned many times.
r.dryden
25/10/2002
22:51
Squeeze, Does the system test plot an equity line? Maybe you could put a moving average on it and exit when the equity line falls below it.
r.dryden
Chat Pages: 3  2  1
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:33 V: D:20161207 20:18:09