ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

RQIH R&q Insurance Holdings Ltd

2.845
0.00 (0.00%)
18 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
R&q Insurance Holdings Ltd LSE:RQIH London Ordinary Share BMG7371X1065 ORD 2P (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.845 2.70 2.99 - 1,410,260 16:29:15
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Title Insurance 82.8M -297M -0.7929 -0.04 10.64M
R&q Insurance Holdings Ltd is listed in the Title Insurance sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker RQIH. The last closing price for R&q Insurance was 2.85p. Over the last year, R&q Insurance shares have traded in a share price range of 2.80p to 70.60p.

R&q Insurance currently has 374,572,864 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of R&q Insurance is £10.64 million. R&q Insurance has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.04.

R&q Insurance Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1451 to 1472 of 1475 messages
Chat Pages: 59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  50  49  48  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
16/4/2024
14:49
$500m sale this Quarter
Mcap £10m

Do one mms this should be 40p

Because 60p on sale

profit7
08/2/2024
11:56
4.50 on the bid, any chance of a turn around here.....
sbb1x
02/2/2024
16:50
Looks like this is going towards (sad) demise !
foreverbull
23/1/2024
11:47
New 52 week low
sbb1x
22/12/2023
09:56
More bad news. I just do not know how the average PI can underwrite the risk reward of this thing.
catabrit
14/12/2023
09:03
This deal seems bad. The items that R&Q are committed to from the purchase price seem to be there to make the price sound better.
I can almost understand the load of 46 million having to be repaid .
The capital contribution to Accredited should come with some value like shares or be made by the buyer.
I am not sure what the extra collateral is for but if it is accredited then the buyer should be paying it.
The assumed debt 0f 27 million from accredited should not left with accredited.
So at best 27+76 million =103 million should be deducted from the purchase price with the buyer just giving the money to Accredited.
So the purchase price is actually 362 million.
If the collateral is for Accredited then another 40-80 million need to be deducted from the purchase price.

controlledmadness
17/11/2023
15:48
Up 18 percent and no posts...
sbb1x
15/11/2023
14:12
Very interesting developments here. I did well out of this by backing Ken Randall and exiting when he did. Phoenix and Slater thought they new best and have come thoroughly unstuck. I wonder whether Ken Randall may be tempted back? He would need to buy one of the larger holders shares first. It's back to what it was, with the legacy business, at 1/10th of the price!
topvest
24/10/2023
18:35
Yes a friend sent me that article.
I made good money historically from R&Q. Having read that article I decided it was barge pole material

hybrasil
24/10/2023
16:02
Here's how the Insurer is covering it, article is paywalled:

R&Q sells the Accredited crown jewels but proceeds represent only half of debt

The $465mn enterprise value put on Accredited in its proposed sale to Onex Partners appears to be broadly in line with expectations, but net cash proceeds available to R&Q after the deal closes may cover as little as half of the beleaguered parent’s debt, analysis by The Insurer shows.

simon gordon
24/10/2023
14:35
Yeah, spot on. None of the newcomers have done well. Enstar have bossed it and that is probably because they have been in the game for thirty years and own 30% of the stock.
catabrit
24/10/2023
14:31
I think the problem with legacy business is they may have priced the acquisitions aggressively which is haunting them now....
foreverbull
24/10/2023
13:53
Market is saying TBV is likely lower as liabilities have not been priced properly. I would rather own Enstar Group at 0.9x book and likely lower when you take into account their conservatism.
catabrit
24/10/2023
13:47
Agree not uncommon to trade below book, and anything below <0.5 book generally pricing as highly distressed. Interesting to note, 3mn shares traded since yesterday on a float of approx. 374mn or 0.8% - illiquid small cap. Someone could come in and be comfortable at 0.6x book following de-levering and that's be a 2x from here. But ofc it's insurance and not even mgmt seem to know where liabilities are landing...
willemers0n
24/10/2023
11:25
Indeed, but at 20 pence a share, it's now trading at 0.31 P/book or .21 P/ tangible book. They're getting $50mn working cap and liquidity for RQ next 18 months operations, plus that's assuming the top end of $80mn in collateral for RQ legacy liabilities and only $170mn de-levering. They're also injecting $76mn equity to Accredited ex-post transaction, so RQ should still own a stake in accredited right? Unless they're quite listerally asset stripping and leaving a doomed ship, in which case they'll have lawsuits coming their way from main shareholders. Would love ppls thoughts
willemers0n
24/10/2023
11:10
Legacy insurance run by a management team with little skin in the game seldom ends well.
catabrit
24/10/2023
10:39
"simon gordon23 Oct '23 - 14:53 - 1444 of 1447
0 0 0
If this goes to zero, Slater will have lost £82m by turning down 170p. Phoenix about £26m. What a dog's dinner."


Isn't as if they weren't warned. Never ceases to amaze me how badly "OPM" gets managed.

spectoacc
23/10/2023
18:51
Sadly this is what happens when you buy something you know little about. I put this on the watchlist after it was recommended to me on Twitter. I did about an hour of work on it at 50p ish and put it in the too hard pile. For me, legacy insurance with zero competitive advantage is a no-go area almost at any price. Especially if there’s no real alignment.
catabrit
23/10/2023
16:12
Edward,

According to R&Q's website they are still a holder.

simon gordon
23/10/2023
16:08
phoenix sold out a while back i recall
edwardt
23/10/2023
14:53
If this goes to zero, Slater will have lost £82m by turning down 170p. Phoenix about £26m. What a dog's dinner.
simon gordon
23/10/2023
14:49
Control,

There is quite a bit of debt in preference shares to be paid off, including a recent raise of $60m. It looks like most of the money from the sale is going to pay off debt.

The toxic Legacy book has destroyed all the value in the company.

If Gibson RE 1 doesn't work out they are stuffed.

It would have been best if they could have sold Legacy and kept Accredited, obviously nobody wants to go near it. Slater and Phoenix so screwed up on this one, all the signals were flashing sell at 170p and they said no.

simon gordon
Chat Pages: 59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  50  49  48  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock