We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poole Invest. | PIV | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 5.50 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.50 | 5.50 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 24/9/2007 12:55 by puffintickler I origianlly bougth PIV (or PIT) as it was then for 4p in July 2001. Two top-ups at a similar price over the following twelve months left me rather underwater in 2003. Fortunately a further buy at 2.88 improved the balance, however at the start of 2007 I was still well down after interest costs.So reasonably happy with the outcome, hoped for more and just missed another top-up at 3p recently but if all my failures turned out like this I would be very well off. Arthur, are you making a parting comment? Best of luck all. |
Posted at 20/8/2007 14:07 by fhmktg Can't see anybody coming up with a higher offer, unless its one of the other developers in the scheme - Gallaghers, for example. It would have made sense to have one scheme and developer for the area IMHO.Inland have a reputation for turning a quick buck on their brown field developments and they will get the tax benefit for nowt. Still time, I guess and I will hold off accepting until nearer the final date, in the hope of somebody coming up with 7p or higher! Any other views out there from PIV watchers? |
Posted at 18/8/2007 13:51 by sandbank Well there's no need to make an election as to whether to sell your shares until September 4th...and frankly the offer is far too low. The directors of PIV say they've been advised by Zeus Capital (whoever they are) that the terms of the offer are "fair and reasonable". They're obviously not. 7.5p is a lot nearer the mark |
Posted at 06/8/2007 10:13 by sandbank Well I certainly do NOT get the impression that everything has been kicked into touch . I believe there is even some doubt as to whether the October AGM will be held at all . - in other words PIV will have been taken out by then |
Posted at 26/7/2007 08:39 by bodgit Just a few musings while I watch the rain!! I expect to hear about interest in PIV from other potential bidders. Surely it is not just Inland plc who see the value in PIV? Then again, if Inland do not pursue their interest, I guess PIV will fall back a little - a good time to buy perhaps?. So, do I sell half now and lock in the profit and gamble that the remainder will be taken out for at least 6p? Hmmm, decisions decisions! Good luck all anyway, it has been worth the wait - just. |
Posted at 23/7/2007 11:08 by actonman Fhmktg,I certainly don't claim better knowledge, but I had taken the disclosures to mean that Stable and Peter Ward had both disposed of their holdings completely at 6p, with Inland being the buyer. I assume that Barclays may have many clients and just has to report their buys and sells. Does look though that Inland are serious and can't now make an offer at less than 6p. Given the densities Gallagher are going for on their adjoining site in their recent outline planning application, I think PIV must be worth more than 6p. |
Posted at 13/7/2007 07:48 by fhmktg I see from their news listing ( INL) that inland are 'long' in over 3 million PIV shares -option bought at 4.5p and that their record on land sales is running at 160% annual return, since listing on AIM in March.Hopefully Mr Palmer, aided by Mr Cicurel can get a better deal than 6p. Once again my memory suggests that Cicurel bought into PIV at 5.4p and should expect a substantial return on that. |
Posted at 12/7/2007 21:54 by faxxer Ford Barfle - 12 Jul'07 - 18:52 - 733 of 734Hi I can assure you that you have the wrong David Cicurel. The man who is presently a non-exec director of PIV is also CEO of Judges Capital (JDG). He is of Egyptian origin, has had an engineering business in France and I think he is under 50. I deem him to be an extremely pleasant and proper person. I am sure that he will be consulted by David Booth and Anthony Palmer in order to achieve the best possible outcome for shareholders. Judges Capital have about 10% of PIV and is presently their only quoted investment. They make scientific instruments. The following is a link to an announcement by JDG earlier this year. |
Posted at 12/7/2007 12:02 by faxxer something wrong with my screen today both piv and bgt storming awaylooks like the 6p is history and we may see a bit of a bidding war as inl only have small percentage at mo mmmmmmm |
Posted at 04/7/2007 10:01 by fhmktg Telegraph mention, but only to record the annouincement - refers to PIV as a 'Tiles & ceramics manufacturer'!Must be some competition for the assets and the £24m of accrued losses? With Cicurel/Gallaghers and O'Reilly in the frame I expect some action. No doubt there are some models for the site valuation on some spreadsheets, but how do we feel? 9.5 acres of mixed Industrial/ domestic, say with a 50/50 split. Assuming apartments would be the best use at say 2500 sqft each on three levels gives say 150 max at £0.1 million each for the land, with planning permission £15 million Remainder of the land at £5 million? Total £20 million, less debt say £17 milion - rougghly 9p per share? The £24 Million of losses should be worth Up to £5/6 million? I would hope the final outcome should be north of 7-8p. Any other bids? |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
