Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Plant Impact LSE:PIM London Ordinary Share GB00B1F4K366 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +1.50p +4.69% 33.50p 32.00p 35.00p 34.50p 32.75p - 112,916 16:55:05
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Chemicals 7.2 -1.2 -0.9 - 27.37

Plant Impact (PIM) Latest News

More Plant Impact News
Plant Impact Takeover Rumours

Plant Impact (PIM) Share Charts

1 Year Plant Impact Chart

1 Year Plant Impact Chart

1 Month Plant Impact Chart

1 Month Plant Impact Chart

Intraday Plant Impact Chart

Intraday Plant Impact Chart

Plant Impact (PIM) Discussions and Chat

Plant Impact Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
22/6/201710:23Plant Impact - Increasing crop capacity1,105
09/1/201722:21Attended AGM..1
14/5/201415:15PIM - Built on sand?4
17/9/201319:20PLANT IMPACT : transforming agriculture with eco-friendly solutions1,661
15/12/201108:26Plant Impact plc606

Add a New Thread

Plant Impact (PIM) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Plant Impact trades in real-time

Plant Impact (PIM) Top Chat Posts

Plant Impact Daily Update: Plant Impact is listed in the Chemicals sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PIM. The last closing price for Plant Impact was 32p.
Plant Impact has a 4 week average price of 32p and a 12 week average price of 32p.
The 1 year high share price is 55.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 32p.
There are currently 81,695,400 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 39,399 shares. The market capitalisation of Plant Impact is Ā£27,367,959.
wan: Visionon...But it has been a great investment since 2013! Nothing goes up in a straight line though, so let's hope that the next 4 years provides something similar in terms of share price performance. Talking of time invested, it will be 'very' interesting to see how things sit when the dust settles from the current spate of large agriculture mergers and acquisitions. In my view, the opportunities look like they will have also increased (in size and number). Put another way, and without wanting to put too much emphasis on it at the moment, Bayer are relatively small in seeds (which is still a large opportunity to PI), but a Monsanto/Bayer merger would result in the new entity selling around 30 percent of the world’s seeds. Food for thought! Whilst we wait for the dust to settle, hopefully a combination of geographic expansion and new products (not to mention further advances in R&D) will provide new stimulus (other than the ones added to PI's product portfolio!).
horace_h: The last two wonderful summers in the US Midwest have significantly increased the Supply of Corn, Wheat and Soyabeans and thus depressed the price. For those that read charts based solely on price action (Supply and Demand), Soyabean Futures are currently sitting in a Monthly Demand zone and a price rise is the higher probability trade. The debate above as to the significance of that, is interesting and we'll all form our own conclusions as to the relevance of the product price. Having said that, I really don't understand why Mthead is still in this share. When (I clearly had more spare time than sense) I looked at his/her ADVFN posts on PIM. The last time he/she said something positive was 2011, although there was a reference to having a break-even holding price of 31 when another poster was bemoaning buying at 60p. Everything else has been critical or negative. You're obviously entirely welcome to express your opinion but six years of negativity appears a bizarre use of time. Before I get the rosy-tinted label, I AM disappointed that a commercial Wheat product hasn't appeared quicker but the share price and everything else is a vast improvement since John Brubaker assumed control - in 2011. H & T is probably right to observe that the share is "tradeable" until something significant happens but I see PIM as an investment. If I'd sold when we were in the vicinity of 65p, I'd be very pleased and would have bought back in somewhere around now. IF PIM had been (or is) bought out at far higher than 65p, before I got back in, I'd feel stupid. That's obviously the game. I appreciate Wan and others sharing their diligent research and I personally value his objectivity. Yes, he is mostly positive but why wouldn't he be if invested in a share that he (and I) feel has the potential to significantly rise in price. I also appreciate genuine reports on the share that are NOT supportive of a price rise to see if the upside is too limited to stay. I'm not going to speculate why you are so consistently negative - it's not as if you can short the share. As noted, if all you want to do is knock the company and its management that dictate the success of your investment then that's up to you. Have fun but please try and spread a little sunshine occasionally...
wan: I note that there was a similar and relatively steep drop-off in the share price around this time last year, whether such activity is related to the tax year end/start remains to be seen. I continue to monitoring with interest the agricultural sector, which has got especially interesting due to the large M&A taking place and which in turn is offering multiple opportunities! I note the following recent commentary - Fortalis Product Launch CLIENT: Plant Impact SERVICES: Web Design & Development, Digital Strategies, Copywriting, Advertising & Direct Mail, Packaging & Displays, Video & Multimedia Results Currently, the brand has inked three main distributor agreements which represent not only the Midwest, but distribution to the retail channel throughout the entire US. Signal is seeing tremendous engagement on completed forms online and links from our efforts. We look forward to seeing even more results as Plant Impact and Fortalis “grow” their brand in the US! hxxp://
glenglen: I note the drop in the share price - disappointing. A few weeks ago I said I was in this for the long term and the question is what is long term? The 6 monthly results show sales increasing but this is due to weak GBP? Will sales increase in the US? Every little helps and as we enter Brexit the exchange gain will show an increase in sales - this is more circumstantial than improved performance is it not? Will this company ever grow or are we merely sponsoring a group of people who are practicing their hobby?- clever people in their fields of crop science and agricuture I must state but the market appears to by pass this. I'll hold on to 2018 and then see - but my guess is the share price will be as it is now - regardless of any increase in sales. Hope I am wrong (and I will own up if so) but..................
here and there: At least they are making noises about the time table for new products BUT, as yet, there is no trial data being published. Until trial data is published it is impossible to verify the veracity of any new product. It strikes me that this is all about a balance between trade growth, product launch and cash burn….i.e. will the cash in hand plus sales income be enough to sustain the company until new products can be brought on stream. I suspect that there will have to be a modest fund raise in a year or two to support new product launch. I don't see this as much of a problem as the share price is in pretty good shape
glenglen: I am new to this investing lark and will admit I know little about soybean production/exports and related topics. Bought into PIM in 2015 after reading a good report on it- the company was going places so I thought I will get "in on the action" - Took a punt in effect. All I need to know is where is this company going for me as a shareholder? Will the share price ever increase. For 2 years I have read all these "positives" which is good but share price drops and seems to merely hover round 45p - 50p My risk/fault/whatever I fully accept but will there ever be a bonanza coming our way? Is it the intention (long term or otherwise) that Bayer (or someone of the same ilk) will come along and buy them - hopefully offering more than 50p? Long term I do not have a problem with but can someone shed some light on how long that term might just be?
horace_h: Looking at the "viciouscircle" posts, he/she was "the large shareholder that got out in June 2009 with a price he/she was happy with". That would be (at best) the 45p price that has prompted this re-appearance as the price has fallen back from last year's high of circa 65p. No surprise that he/she didn't appear at THAT point to say that he/she had been wrong and should have held. So what kind of keyboard warrior nurses that sort of six year old angst? What kind of warrior (groan) comes back after such a time to give an articulate damnation of Plant Impact from his/her point of view? In virtually the same style as Agextpert on an earlier insidious thread. Marks out of 10? I really don't care whether it is David Marks or not - if it is then he clearly hasn't learned anything from his dismissal in 2009 and one would wonder why HE doesn't stick with what he was clearly very good at. Corporations such as Bayer, Syngenta etc. do not form the type of relationship John Brubaker and David Jones have developed unless they are true professionals. Going back to making mischief in "chat rooms" would not bode well for Levity's future. Regardless of his/her identity, perhaps our hero will tell us what's so great about Levity of why - like Agextpert, he/she has returned after six years to save us all for ourselves. I hold one other AIM share - Reneuron - and on of the various boards (LSE, III etc.) there is a character called Fredd1eBoy. This apparently nice Chap has been promoting the share with unbelievable optimism and "the great breakthrough to our fortune has been just around the next RNS" for years now. It's just as ludicrous as some character coming back after six years or, to a lesser extent, dear old MTHead who hasn't said anything positive since 2011. The share price hasn't collapsed as a result of the patent application - as Timbo says this is not the first time this has happened. If anything, it has fallen back because the Wheat product has not yet arrived - that IS a disappointment to me but no reason to sell or worry. But the day I listen to purely positive Rampers or purely negative mischief makers (I do have other terms) is the day I go back to playing the Lottery. And where is BugOil when one needs it...
wan: As Timbo points out you don't need a patent to commercialise your product, but you do need a patent to protect your product and stop others using it. Given the efforts deployed by the likes of Marks to have the patent refused, one assumes he has more than a personal vendetta with PI (given the management changes at PI), so we can assume he wants to use the product, which also tells us it's a great product. However, things have moved on! Whilst the likes of Marks has focused on the current technology, PI has been developing a new and improved technology and subsequently filed a patent application (which Marks cannot yet see!). Most readers will now know that the new technology has already launched as Fortalis, which importantly has already undergone extensive field testing. The results and data has resulted in the extension of Plant Impact's ongoing business relationship with Bayer CropScience, this technology validation via extensive field trials and Bayers further commitment (to both Fortalis and Veritas) says far more than Mark's can attempt to imply on here (or elsewhere). From the recent RNS - "This new foliar spray is Plant Impact's first formulated product to use the second generation of the Group's CaT(TM) technology, which has been developed over recent years, tested successfully in Argentina, Brazil and the United States and is subject to a pending patent application. " Obviously I expect PI to present further evidence (probably close to the 4 months time limit), which obviously could address the issues, especially as they have been precisely and clearly laid out, and at the very least, presenting further evidence will extend the process to the continued frustration of the likes of Mark's! In the meantime and in any regard, PI will continue to commercialise products that use the original technology, which as Timbo also highlights, is about more than what is contained in the patent itself e.g. actual in field testing and yield data and not to mention PI's secret formulation, which the patent does not reveal. Bayer's patent knowledge and indeed dedicated IP staff, will have also taken the situation into account before committing to both the current and new technology, and I would also draw readers attention to the following from the 'initial' commercial agreement with Bayer - "The parties have agreed to an initial, multi-year sales and production forecast and to various commercial and intellectual property responsibilities under the agreement. The financial details were not disclosed. " Notably then and six months later, PI announced a significant additional agreement with Bayer, which again actually says much more than the likes of Mark's can ever hope to say or imply. In short and in my view, efforts from the likes of Mark's will prove to have been ineffectual to PI's success!
horace_h: Dear Me. We could always count on you to snipe and post only bad news when the share price was in the low teens and you've been quiet until the recent bouncing of the share price around the current value. As with most posters on this good board, Wan has been balanced and attended the Investor days when able. Similarly, Here and There has been a measure of both good and bad and acknowledged the need for "the next leg up" with the introduction of the wheat product as the required catalyst for another leg up in the share price. If Dr Adams and his team can't deliver then we'll all no doubt reconsider where the share price will go. Thus far they have delivered on all that they said they would and PIM is not just a one trick pony based on the lucrative Veritas product - Banzai being one obvious addition to the previous portfolio. You're entirely free to promote your enduringly negative view but I do not think that Wan deserved that snide comment.
bigglesbingham: Hi Alan , your saying Brazil concerns you but results from Brazil are only just filtering into the share price. It's not as though share price has been reliant on Brazil for a number of years and profits just starting to drop off. I think the key here is the quality of management and research appointments . Dyor but their expertise is unquestioned and top managements ultimate remuneration is linked to share price performance .
Plant Impact share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:31 V: D:20170622 16:41:55