We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phorm Corp | LSE:PHRM | London | Ordinary Share | SG9999009278 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
31/5/2016 23:28 | murky is as murky does. | deko | |
31/5/2016 18:52 | For example, can I ask ... Is Phorm Inc still trading? Forget Phuid Media UK etc etc Is imarker still part of the interweb? and/or Phorm? What was/is insomnis? What, if anything, are insomnis.com doing these days? Where are/were they based? Do you mean Phorm Inc or Phorm Corporation (Singapore) Ltd? PhormUK Inc became PhluidMedia Inc. and the registration is still active at Companies House. Phorm Inc is probably still around in Delaware somewhere. Phorm Corporation? - you'd have to apply to the Singapore authorities to find out about the company status and nowadays the company registrar makes you pay for the info. Imarker - still has a web presence and appears to still be active. No idea who owns it - there was never any clarity about that. Insomnis Media - Appeared magically around the time Phorm Corporation were trying to raise funds in the USA, and possibly created an impression that Phorm had "media partners" - which some gullible investors may have been taken in by. Website still around, UK Companies house registration still active. hxxp://www.insomnis- hxxp://www.imarker.c shows: Entity Name : PHORM CORPORATION LIMITED(n.k.a) PHORM CORPORATION PTE. LIMITED(f.k.a) shown as "live company". but with a RED CROSS for compliance rating - ie NON COMPLIANT The State of Delaware lists: Phorm Acquisition Corp 4308842 Phorm Inc 4308840 Phorm Redom Corp 5194342 Enjoy. I imagine things will remain completely murky for quite some time. | btcustomer | |
31/5/2016 17:38 | There seem to be many, many hanging questions regarding Phorm Inc By design, I suppose. The share price has been an irrelevance for months, if not longer. For example, can I ask ... Is Phorm Inc still trading? Forget Phuid Media UK etc etc Is imarker still part of the interweb? and/or Phorm? What was/is insomnis? What, if anything, are insomnis.com doing these days? Where are/were they based? Maybe Austin Reed's orderly shutdown will ne more orderly .. Sad to see, but more orderly. | pseudopwr | |
27/5/2016 21:51 | Is Andy Pipkin still here? How sad! | btcustomer | |
27/5/2016 17:38 | “Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise.” | zaggie | |
27/5/2016 01:28 | BTC what did the sheriff of aim say, i'm not a member of his site. | deko | |
26/5/2016 09:24 | Are IgbertSponk and Andy Pipkin still here? How sad! | btcustomer | |
25/5/2016 20:50 | i see the two poorly programmed forum bots are failing the turing test again someone realy should decommission them, they have tried rebooting them but all they do is witter on about search engines instead of the correct topic of phorm | bluecar1 | |
25/5/2016 12:37 | Did it say anything interesting? I didnt need to read Noirua's pertinent post again, and got as far as 'Are' with custard's monolog before I nodded off. | andy pipkin | |
25/5/2016 08:54 | Ah, a long diatribe from BTCustomer. Bet he feels better for that. | igbertsponk | |
25/5/2016 08:21 | Andy Pipkin 11 May'16 - 10:27 - 19388 of 19428 1 0 Please be aware that 12bn is a liar and a fraud. I havnt held PHRM since 2009, and I wouldnt wish a collection to start under false pretences.///// What sort of sicko ramps here for 7 years without holding any shares? The question is 'is Andy Pipkin mentally ill or a liar or both?' | 12bn | |
25/5/2016 01:37 | BTC what did the sheriff of AIM say? | deko | |
24/5/2016 15:44 | Who's up for a class action against Google and the antis ? | igbertsponk | |
24/5/2016 15:09 | minor points 1: why should a search provider pay a company anything when they are allowed to index a web page / forum using a known robot entry? 2: how would a search provider pay a company which has ceased trading? 3: this is a forum about a company called phluidmedia / phorm who recently announced it could no longer trade due to lack of money, not a search provider phorm / phluid media are busted flush, shares have been cancelled on AIM and most of BOD now according to linkedin list phorm as previous company | bluecar1 |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions