We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orosur Mining Inc | LSE:OMI | London | Ordinary Share | CA6871961059 | COM SHS NPV |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.20 | 36.36% | 4.50 | 4.40 | 4.70 | 4.55 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 11,059,457 | 16:35:03 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 189k | -1.79M | -0.0087 | -8.05 | 14.39M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/10/2016 08:41 | So Augustus I see you dont like the investment case here well fair enough but what is your agenda. Where were you earlier in the year when the share price was less than half the price it is today It is all about timing in some goldies. Look at SOLG for example By your premis you wouldnt invest in that either but some people have increased their capital by 10 times in the last year with more to come. Maybe you are right and maybe you are not time will tell either way. Personally I am in profit here by some margin and do not intend to exit any time soon. What shares are you invested in presently that are interesting so I can look at the possible opportunity I am missing. | billthebank | |
19/10/2016 22:19 | AG Stratex sold Turkey assets for multiples of explo money spent+ have share of Altintepe. However, blew a fortune in Africa for no tangible returns. | highly geared | |
19/10/2016 21:26 | iantrader, OMI is a producer that has been producing for at least 13 years -- it produced from its best assets first, then moved down the list as each asset was depleted. When I first investigated them, they were claiming to be profitable at $800. Since most explorers lose money -- I would regard them as nearly worthless. In fact of all the gold explorers that I have seen on AIM - I do not remember any of them that sold an asset for more than they spent on proving it up. The reason the big boys don't do much exploring - is they leave all the risk to the minnows - then when the minnows hit the jackpot - they buy it (often for a fraction of the money spent proving it). How can you look at OMI's assets and say that they are going to be more profitable now than they were previously. They have never returned a penny to shareholders - and never will - thus I think that they are indeed worthless. How much would you pay to buy a company that has been producing for 13 years and never made enough to pay the owners a single penny on their investment. ----------------- There are plenty of shares out there that make a genuine profit - and pay a dividend - why would you choose OMI above any of them? | augustusgloop | |
19/10/2016 16:45 | 32 cents Why arent we nearer 20p now?? Strange | billthebank | |
19/10/2016 13:43 | someone buying in nicely again...hope to see North of 20p soon....maybe management discussions with city are going well then? DYOR | qs99 | |
19/10/2016 12:55 | Hi Simon Many thanks for the response and look forward to the update. I agree and this is a decent chunk of my portfolio: POG (news in October due per last RNS) and SHG (great recent update IMO) being the other gold producers. Not sure if you have a view on them but no harm me putting them forward here. All the best QS99 | qs99 | |
19/10/2016 12:51 | QS99 I shall shortly publish. OMI is very cheap. SC | simon cawkwell | |
19/10/2016 12:03 | Good afternoon Simon C Following your article yesterday on Master Investor, did you see the CEO and what was your view / outcome? if you could share with an interested shareholder that would be great, many thanks QS99 | qs99 | |
19/10/2016 11:10 | Dont forget OMI is sitting on net cash, $5m I believe, which should be discounted. I dont believe we will be sub 20p for long. | breaktwister | |
19/10/2016 10:06 | PM prices on the way, looks quite solid this time (hope so) | scottishfield | |
19/10/2016 09:40 | ian ~ with different usernames he tries similar tactics elsewhere | gaaston | |
19/10/2016 09:07 | Agustusgloop Again you are being cynical and it appears to me that you have a rather unbalanced view of how to value assets. Applying your logic to explorers, surely you would have to make all of them worthless? Tesla (overvalued in my view but still worth billions) has made huge losses, compared to OMI, over many years, has never paid a dividend, has had several placings, has never had a profitable quarter....yet is worth $30Billion. How can that be? The question for you is what is OMI worth and if it is significantly different from £17m, why and why is your analysis so superior to the market? | iantrader2 | |
19/10/2016 08:54 | Ty, g. Good to hear sensible comments. | overdale123 | |
19/10/2016 08:44 | I have watched and been invested here for years and there are a number of rather nasty people who have lost quite a lot of money in the past and others who are likely paid de - rampers. These are clever people and a few will be shorting this from time to time. However, DO NOT BE PUT OFF, this is a good company to be invested in and it has quality management (which was not the case a few years ago unfortunately). I know of highly respected investors here and they sure wouldn't be in unless the scenario is sound and likely to be profitable.( Some too of the aforementioned have shared / mixed up user names) | gaaston | |
19/10/2016 00:07 | Nonsense. Complete rubbish. The first share price that I can establish for OMI was 240p in Jan 2005 = 11 years ago If they had paid a 5% dividend and maintained it you would have received 12p per year for 11 years = 132p return, which you could have earned more interest on. Instead they paid you nothing. The POG in 2003 (when I have first evidence of OMI producing) was $340 its now $1,262 --- its increased by 270% The POG is up by a factor of 3.7 The OMI share price is down by 93% (from my first discovered sp) It doesn't seem to support your idea that the new discoveries and the massive rise in the POG made the possibility of a 132p cumulative dividend pale into insignificance. In fact it shows that shareholders have been completely stiffed! | augustusgloop | |
18/10/2016 22:01 | Not really interested in dividends from my investments in small miners. They pale into insignificance in comparison to the effect Gold Price and any new discovery have on the sp | overdale123 | |
18/10/2016 20:30 | hazl, on an inflation adjusted basis - the POG over the last 13 years has probably been higher than in any other 13 year period in history. Is that really a bear market for gold producers? Many other producers have made profits and paid dividends in this period. Not only have they not paid dividend - they do not look like they are in a strong enough position to do so for at least the next 5 years. Where is the investment case? Its just a pure punt on the POG - with the hope that if the POG does indeed rise - they won't squander the windfall like they did in the past. | augustusgloop | |
18/10/2016 20:04 | I think you are a trouble maker AG. Not currently invested here,myself, but dear oh dear how could they pay dividends after only just climbing out of a previous bear market? Interesting posts again richgit. | hazl | |
18/10/2016 18:41 | UK Government should wake up !!!!! Merkel in tears-Hollande dreaming about His Ships..but when the US wants something.. HYPOCRISY !!!!......... US Badly Needs Russia’s Technology to Keep Its Space Program Afloat The US space program, including military satellites, depends on Russian technology. The issue is important enough to lift the sanctions on the Russian cutting edge engines. At the same time, the United States openly exerts pressure on the European Union to make it keep anti-Russian sanctions in force. The sanctions make Europe suffer much more than the US. US Senator McCain is right to say, «This is the height of hypocrisy! How can our government tell European countries and governments that they need to hold the line on maintaining sanctions on Russia, which is far harder for them to do, when we are gutting our own policy in this way?» The rocket engines’ deal testifies to the fact that Russia and the US continue to cooperate in the field of space research, where America badly needs Russian cutting edge technology. It is also an example of egregious hypocrisy and double standards when Washington makes the allies do the dirty work for it. This is a very serious matter for the Europeans to think about. It also puts into question the very expediency of the sanctions. Is it worth it, if nobody but the US – the initiator of the sanctions - pays Moscow billions of dollars for rocket engines to boost Russian economy? | richgit | |
18/10/2016 18:11 | I'll not be as 'in your face' as augustusgloop, but objectively he is simply presenting the true numbers! Only two things will affect this SP 1) performance - and currently there is no allowance for anything but good news (what about strikes, floods, Forex shifts, equipment damage, etc which are always real risks) - so its currently very uncertain from this perspective with only downside risk 2) PoG - and this is the only one of these two share price considerations that has varied these last several years (after Fowlup took his undeserved rewards away). I.e., its really just a leveraged play on PoG, with an inbuilt assumption that nothing will go wrong operationally. | bigtbigt | |
18/10/2016 16:07 | Has reached 34 cents today in Canada 21p equiv before dropping back to 0.28 ie 17p. More to come Yes there is no doubt OMI is a small company but we are producing so for now I am not selling | billthebank | |
18/10/2016 15:22 | I think it's healthy enough when those who have supported a company's initial recovery move on and those who are willing to invest and support the next phase join the remaining holders. There's a transition phase for any share price as a result, then it moves on if management continue to get it right and external factors do not impinge too greatly.FWIW I agree with the commentators who back gold as a safe haven, since where else are you going to turn with things the way they are? There are no quick solutions. I have no idea what a fair price for gold, that roughly reflects the balance of supply and demand, would be.. but I hope it is sufficient to reward the endeavours and good sense of Mr Salazar and his team. | photon | |
18/10/2016 14:54 | nice reversal up again | qs99 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions