We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northacre | LSE:NTA | London | Ordinary Share | GB0006877939 | ORD 2.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 95.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
30/1/2013 12:26 | I expect some posters keep an eye on the asking prices of our apartments- do they seem to get marked up with the market? | dupree | |
30/1/2013 08:10 | A "housing expert" was on BBC Breakfast today. It sounded to me that he had said prices had gone up in Chelsea and Kensington by 13% over the past year - subtitles said that he said 18%. Either way, a significant rise in Northacre territory. | david77 | |
29/1/2013 17:40 | His declared holding is only up to yesterday he may have another 1%+ to add to that now. Wonder where they are all coming from? | fireplace22 | |
29/1/2013 16:25 | RNS. share holdings. Mr AHMED ALI MUKHTAR AL YOUSUF buys 228,000 shares. now owns 3.27%. Interesting is it not! | clampit | |
29/1/2013 15:14 | Of course. was only testing to see what the real bid price was. | clampit | |
29/1/2013 15:12 | i sincerely hope you ignored that | brando69 | |
29/1/2013 15:09 | offered for my shares | clampit | |
29/1/2013 14:11 | offered 15000 to buy? or offered for your shares? | brando69 | |
29/1/2013 13:54 | being offered 98.8p for 15000 online. | clampit | |
29/1/2013 12:25 | 100p on the mid | brando69 | |
29/1/2013 12:00 | the plot thickens | brando69 | |
29/1/2013 11:58 | 100,000k gone through at £1. | fireplace22 | |
29/1/2013 11:32 | you don't need to tell me that 50% is no good i'm the person who constantly bangs on and tells people why you need 75% but the subtlety of staying just under 50% ostensibly is to make it marginally easier for damac to bid. Once spadille go over 50% damac's job is that bit harder or even futile if spadille want it to be | daneswooddynamo | |
29/1/2013 11:26 | 50%'s no good if they still have DAMAC on their back, must be easier now for them to give a higher offer to satisfy DAMAC and us by default. Unless DAMAC are friendly and agree to be a substantial minority s'holder. | fireplace22 | |
29/1/2013 11:19 | well if you add his stake to spadille's it would take them nicely over 50% first hurdle. So could be a "friend" and they are just playing around at moment to see if damac bids | daneswooddynamo | |
29/1/2013 10:53 | Given the geography of the latest buyer one may infer that he is closer to the bidders than we are and given that he has almost certainly bought at or close to the current offer price, he presumably is expecting something a bit better than 96p. Or is he just another pawn in this charade? | fireplace22 | |
29/1/2013 10:24 | It depends what each side wants out of the deal, one just maybe arbitraging, the other may seriously want to develop the marque. Maybe they could as you say, contrive agreement an at 96p and divi up the assets later. | fireplace22 | |
29/1/2013 10:10 | Knowing these characters , somebody will grease somebody's palm and they will sell at 96p. Wonder wer Klas is enjoying his 96p | noddy31 | |
29/1/2013 10:10 | Knowing these characters , somebody will grease somebody's palm and they will sell at 96p. Wonder wer Klas is enjoying his 96p | noddy31 | |
29/1/2013 09:02 | One hump or two? | brando69 | |
29/1/2013 08:52 | See? It will be a camel race. Noble bedu of AD vs white slaving soukists of Dubai | dupree | |
28/1/2013 15:09 | Big holder declaring his hand now. When did he acquire so many? His from Dubai, Will he sell to Dubai based Damac or to ADMC? | noddy31 | |
28/1/2013 11:52 | better opportunities elsewhere jamie.had a reasonable gain anyway.piled into lvd and pto(longer term bet).fig. | fig1 | |
28/1/2013 11:37 | bit of time value but i'm with you and more importantly still good chance of higher offer | daneswooddynamo | |
28/1/2013 11:26 | Why take 94 when 96 is on the table? | jamie62 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions