We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newriver Reit Plc | LSE:NRR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BD7XPJ64 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.40 | 4.39% | 80.90 | 78.80 | 79.50 | 79.50 | 76.00 | 76.00 | 816,253 | 16:35:05 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Investment Trust | 73.6M | -16.8M | -0.0537 | -14.80 | 248.52M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/12/2015 20:14 | Cheers red, will have a look at those. | gorilla36 | |
01/12/2015 16:33 | gorilla Nearly overlooked Psn. | redartbmud | |
01/12/2015 16:26 | gorilla I hold Bdev, Tw, Smp, Sgro, Inpp, Ukcm, plus Clln and Mklw that can be loosely related. Rest of portfolio well spread out. red | redartbmud | |
01/12/2015 15:28 | Red - Agreed re low maintenance, in fact I want it to go quiet for a few days now so it does not attract the attention of day traders or hedge fund robots..lol! I would be interested to hear what else you are in of a similar vein. I hold MANX, RNWH, HGG GAMA, TRAK. Those have similar profiles to NRR. Not so good this year have been OPG, SKIL, SPRP, QP. | gorilla36 | |
01/12/2015 09:35 | gorilla That is why I am here. I'm afraid that the tintins just don't get companies like this. It is a share that requires little maintenance and a company that should continue to consolidate it's position, growing in strength and therefore increase share price and dividends. red | redartbmud | |
01/12/2015 09:31 | Redartbmud - To be honest a £1.00 a year with the excellent dividend would do me fine. Far to many companies going for breakneck growth which ends in tragedy. Would much prefer to see a well managed conservative co. grow its business and dividend over time. Nice steady growth and no nasty surprises or shocks on the way. | gorilla36 | |
01/12/2015 09:07 | Yes, it has been a slow upward struggle since I first invested at just over £3 per share. The market has not warmed to the business plan, but as they grow they are able to cement their position. | redartbmud | |
01/12/2015 08:50 | Absolutely gorilla36 - they've been knocking at this ceiling for a while now so I hope that the break-out can be maintained! | randomambler | |
30/11/2015 21:49 | Through that £3.50 barrier at last, lets hope it holds now! | gorilla36 | |
18/11/2015 12:59 | Well, I think these are pretty stonking results! | gorilla36 | |
12/11/2015 09:58 | Div payment tomorrow | orchestralis | |
21/10/2015 07:54 | good update today: Strong second quarter sees GBP222.3 million of strategic acquisitions at a combined average yield of 9.6% and continued progress on value-enhancing asset management and risk-controlled development | deadly | |
16/10/2015 07:31 | mmmm - just can't seem to punch through that £3.50 mark! | gorilla36 | |
24/8/2015 06:14 | Exchange of contracts for £53.5 million acquisition of 158 Pubs from Punch Taverns, at a net initial yield of 13.61% | skinny | |
03/8/2015 13:36 | David, Never doubted they were cleverer than me and I had forgotten the salient paragraph in the link you provided. O/T I posted a query on the VLK thread. Can you clarify? | bscuit | |
03/8/2015 13:17 | I thought most of the convenience stores they'd agreed to build was on attached spare land or the pub car parks? - ie they'd agreed to develop surplus space and in many cases retained the pub. | jeff h | |
03/8/2015 11:50 | I suspect they will not keep them trading as pubs long term.....they tend to convert them when tenancies run out or planning applications are completed allowing maximum development gain. They did this very successfully before with Marstons two years ago so I am sure they know what they are doing | davidosh | |
03/8/2015 06:47 | I would be concerned if they diversified to create an arm that is a pub business. Their experience is as a property co. and pubcos are disposing of this stock because it is grossly underperforming. Management and infrastructure would not be in place, neither would they have economies of scale. | redartbmud | |
03/8/2015 00:27 | But surprisingly "a source close to NRR said it was likely to keep some running as Pubs" which will be a departure from retail conversion and not something shown as a use for premises on its own website. These pubs are non-food operations. Curious. | bscuit | |
01/8/2015 23:41 | Small mention in the Sunday Times about NRR possibly spending £50 million on 150 of Punch Taverns worst performing pubs, looking to turn them into stores. Not sure if the recent fund raise had enough cash left over for this deal after buying out the 2 JVs. New funds needed? | p_buz | |
22/6/2015 09:04 | Red Speaking as a qualified accountant I think our profession can (I did say no guarantees). Brian Souter, Barry Hearn, etc and legal guys are often close to success as well, eg Max Mosley along with Bernie Ecklestone. | belt n braces | |
22/6/2015 08:56 | Belt Speaking as a qualified accountant, our profession does not make the best CEO. | redartbmud | |
22/6/2015 08:54 | Purchased some of these today. Reasons: (1) CEO is solicitor and qualified accountant, although there is no guarantee to success, having such qualifications should mean the CEO understands the need to work in the interests of shareholders. In my view this is different from some other professions who may work towards an engineering goal (for example) which would not necessary always fall in line with profitability, debt reduction, etc. (2) The placing was at a very fair price in relation to the share price, and unlike some placings for other smaller companies did not present the placing people with an instant massive profit. (3) The share has good volume and liquidity. Onwards and upwards!! | belt n braces | |
21/6/2015 21:17 | I don't understand the previous comment at all. This particular placing is positive for existing shareholders for at least two reasons: 1) The new shares are being placed at a decent premium to the NAV - which will have the effect of hoisting the post-placing NAV higher still. 2) The equity base will be substantially enlarged by this placing and so the gearing level will naturally decrease sharply (as debt stays the same). Beyond these points there's always the chance that the board might deploy these funds sensibly - as they have in the past. So I don't know why you see it as a negative? | randomambler |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions