Nature Technology Solutions Share Discussion Threads

[eibbor] 24/10/2009 15:21

Not dead - changed name to Nature Group /epic to NGR.

[quidnunc] 23/10/2009 10:31

Never mind Oil in the water, I think we can safely say Dead in the water!
Q.

[quidnunc] 22/7/2009 11:23

Entry Date: 22/07/2009
Reference: Not provided
Type of document: Contract Notice
Country: UNITED KINGDOM
Nature of contract: Supply contract

UK-Southampton: provision of oil containment and recovery system at sea. The Maritime and Coastguard Agency requires a one off oil collection, containment and recovery system for at-sea operations for use in varying current speeds and sea energy. The requirement is for a fully contained complete package with all the necessary elements for an effective operation

[langland] 01/7/2009 10:55

They produced a decent set of results last week.

[quidnunc] 01/7/2009 10:13

Not really. They took what they wanted from the markets and the small PI's and then left them for dead.
No worthwhile value added,no news, no developments and no chance that I'll ever invest in them again under the current management.
That's why the share price has been flatlining for months.
Q.

[rupert_bear] 20/4/2009 18:41

Is ANYONE interested in these any more?

[jcpete5] 09/1/2009 08:27

Director buying Q-but what do they know eh! : )

[2magpies] 23/12/2008 07:42

So, let me get this right: director bought shares in NSO @ 20p.

That's alot higher than where the share price is. Isn't it?

[jcpete5] 18/11/2008 11:20

Perhaps u could suggest a more realistic reason why share price not bombed as many other stocks have done. Chance for u to demonstrate some intelligence for the first time. The bulletin board awaits....

[quidnunc] 18/11/2008 08:46

Aah there speaks the expert in both.
I bow to your mastery.

Q.

[jcpete5] 17/11/2008 23:37

Pretty robust q-wonder why? Completely accept ure explaination that world and the share holders have forgotten about NSO.......









































is as purile and lacking in intelligence as all ure other postings.

[jmankey] 02/11/2008 23:46

Well it sounds good, but its a long way from commercial application.

[quidnunc] 31/10/2008 14:20

Looks like the technology is getting past its sell by date
Q.

[quidnunc] 14/10/2008 11:15

No fallout thus far. I suspect the world has forgotten them as they have their shareholders.
Q.

[quidnunc] 07/10/2008 09:02

Don't rely on the above charts, they don't adapt for the revaluation.

[velvetide] 02/10/2008 13:03

Comrades, we have reason to give thanks to our dear market makers, they have deemed three forths of a dollar cent should be credited to our accounts; time for a sip of Victory Gin

[quidnunc] 25/9/2008 14:49

Another ha'penny nibble salutes jc's latest ad hom contribution as if to underline his pathetic attempt at irony with some of the real thing.
Q.

[jcpete5] 25/9/2008 14:02

It's the deramp couple-how's the summer season go? So when u pair gonna tie the knot? Look's like u were right-I take my hat off to u. Have to admit I failed to predict this total global share chaos unlike like u pair. Wish now that I'd listened to u and sold. Wish I had ure unique ability :)

[h d shoring] 25/9/2008 09:41

Soon be getting near my target,will buy in again at around 7p

[quidnunc] 24/9/2008 08:59

Uninspiring reading. Small increase in profits, warning of impending drop in revenue stream.
Market unimpressed thus far.
Q.

[velvetide] 23/9/2008 07:18

results are out

[quidnunc] 21/8/2008 14:46

zzzzzzzzzz HD why bother?
Q.

[jcpete5] 19/8/2008 10:20

11.8p divided by twenty=0.59p

rise of 1.8p or .09p in old money

or 18% rise if u prefer

The point is H -significantly higher, historically. Add to this the backdrop of credit crunch and share consolidation. QED