Nanoscience Share Discussion Threads

[spekky] 18/2/2008 18:20

Perhaps upping the stake there might be worthwhile.

"AppliedSensor is ranked 32nd in Sweden, based on its revenue growth of more than 650 percent over the past three years, and ranked 254th in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA)."..............seems good to me.

[spekky] 13/2/2008 14:46

AND just another one

[spekky] 13/2/2008 11:13

Certainly was a strange one........as you say,possibly a bug.

[don muang] 13/2/2008 09:25

all quiet of transactions this morning .... wonder if we'll have an 'interesting' half hour this afternoon again.... !!!

[don muang] 12/2/2008 16:42

... a bug in an automatic buy / sell program ....?

[spekky] 12/2/2008 16:36

Anybody else think todays trades are a bit unusual?

[spekky] 11/2/2008 10:21

A slightly more detailed story from ISSCC and it seems to suggest that the global partner is indeed U.S. based (which we've probably concluded anyway).

[spekky] 10/2/2008 19:01

humbugg

Don't worry ,Toumaz is streets ahead,hence the recent deal.No-one ever said there'd be no competition,all the more reason to celebrate when Toumaz becomes the defacto solution.

[humbugg] 09/2/2008 08:57

spekky,
thanks for the articles. am i missing something or are GE & Phillips involved in bringing a similar technology to the market as toumaz?? if they are im worried for NAN.

[spekky] 08/2/2008 12:45

Toumaz is one of the sponsors,excellent PR.

[spekky] 08/2/2008 08:24

Regarding disclosures,have the AIM rules changed? I presume the extract below is the reason we have not seen the flip side of the recent CVS disposal.


Related party transactions
13. This rule applies to any transaction whatsoever with a related party which exceeds 5% in any of the class tests.

I can't find any reference to 3% thresholds and 1% increments,Apparently its up to NAN to update us via the website once every six months (insofar as it is aware) as to the significant holdings.So,just for the record
%
Saad Investment Company 21,330,500 (9.81)
Glastad Invest 20,371,882 (9.37)
NAN Directors 14,409,432 (6.63)
Herald Investment Management 13,300,000 (6.12)
David C Newton 13,254,853 (6.10)
Majedie Investments 11,955,625 (5.50)
Gennum Corporation 11,078,288 (5.09)
Sinolite 8,302,235 (3.82)
Keith Errey 7,876,865 (3.62)
Seymour Pierce Ellis, stockbrokers 7,352,500 (3.38)
A.N.OTHER (or one/all of above) 7.400,000 (ex CVS holding.)

That was the position at 07/08/07,so I guess we're due an update.

[spekky] 06/2/2008 09:41

A little something from ISSCC.

[spekky] 06/2/2008 08:58

Cheers,will pick up a copy later.

[the shuffle man] 06/2/2008 08:36

You dont need to register to read it.

There is a whole one page spread in the FT, its an interview with Chris Toumazou talking about imperial college and the institute of Bio Engineering and the spin outs. It mentions nanos and the digital plasters.

[spekky] 06/2/2008 08:22

The Shuffle Man

Sorry,could you sum it up (don't want to register,bit lazy I know)

[spekky] 05/2/2008 16:47

Interesting comment on CVS RNS (re Bluewater Bio disposal)

" These shares, in addition to certain other shareholdings that have been disposed of at the same time, are being acquired by institutional shareholders"

[don muang] 05/2/2008 09:18

.... and a few buyers took / are quietly taking advantage of NAN share price dip this morning .... again, a reasonably good sign in present market ....

[spekky] 05/2/2008 09:03

Yep,only had a brief look at CVS but they appear to be forced sellers.Various things going wrong there,not a reflection on the situation here at NAN.

[humbugg] 05/2/2008 08:35

spekky,
looking to see who picks up the slack? hoping to up my stake with the right news.
off topic, somethings not right at CVS me thinks???????

[spekky] 05/2/2008 08:19

Yesterdays news has spooked some.Hopefully another rns will calm them.

[humbugg] 05/2/2008 08:15

don,
looks like CVS are in need of some cash pronto, share price on the floor, investors that were willing to invest large stakes have fled the nest. my worry is why????? lets hope SAAD pick up the slack.

[spekky] 04/2/2008 13:44

Would be nice if the board ( or any member of ) chose this time to lift their stake,my money is still on SAAD or AWAL BANK (SAAD subsiduary).

[don muang] 04/2/2008 12:10

Well, as mentioned, perhaps CVS needed some extra cash. They seemed to have only two easily realizable investments in their portfolio to dispose off. So not reading anything sinister in them opting to dispose of their NAN shares. In present market they were probably 'happy' to get 7p for them considering they were off-loading 4% of a company that has a mkt cap of only about £15m.

[spekky] 04/2/2008 10:41

So next RNS will tell us who took them,v.interesting.

Don Muang - 30 Jan'08 - 17:18 - 310 of 319...........you called it.

lets see the other side of the coin .