Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.25p -0.90% 27.50p 27.25p 28.25p 27.50p 27.25p 27.50p 49,246 09:12:57
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Technology Hardware & Equipment 0.5 -12.6 -4.5 - 65.51

Nanoco (NANO) Latest News

More Nanoco News
Nanoco Takeover Rumours

Nanoco (NANO) Share Charts

1 Year Nanoco Chart

1 Year Nanoco Chart

1 Month Nanoco Chart

1 Month Nanoco Chart

Intraday Nanoco Chart

Intraday Nanoco Chart

Nanoco (NANO) Discussions and Chat

Nanoco (NANO) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
09:12:5727.502,934806.85AT
09:12:5727.502,166595.65AT
08:44:0527.269,7552,659.22O
08:38:3727.257,4182,021.41AT
08:18:0427.502,809772.48AT
View all Nanoco trades in real-time

Nanoco (NANO) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
24/11/2017
08:20
Nanoco Daily Update: Nanoco is listed in the Technology Hardware & Equipment sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 27.75p.
Nanoco has a 4 week average price of 22p and a 12 week average price of 17.75p.
The 1 year high share price is 50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 17.75p.
There are currently 238,224,606 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 529,438 shares. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £65,511,766.65.
20/11/2017
20:54
ih_418591: I'm not clutching at anything. I'm just reading the facts. I follow all news for the qdot market including news about Nanoco, Nanosys, and QMC. They are all leading contenders for the qdot supply market. I hope they all have a piece of the commercial supply chain of cad-free qdots. Competition is paramount for market growth and market growth is paramount to us as investors to seeing rapid sales increases and subsequent share price increases. What I find slightly disturbing is the insistence that Nanoco with be in Acer or Asus just because there were in a prototype (assumed) AUO displays at Touch Taiwan. We've been here before. Nanoco has shown protypes at multiple tradeshows. At CES in 2015, Nanoco was in LG's prototype. Where is that commercial product? At CES in 2017, Nanoco was in TCL, Hisense, and Philips at CES. Where are those commercial products? Apparently, asking questions isn't acceptable since I've actually yet to get anyone to answer one of my previous questions?
09/10/2017
19:26
syd7777: We were once the leaders of the BBs but the comments and the banter has suddenly dried up.I would like to share a good post from NigWit from the other BB.I made the mistake of posting from my Ipad which does not always work well. Here's the substance of my post again but tidied up and with apologies. ----- Nano is the only supplier of CFQDs but has been under financial strain so the whole almost CF QD display industry has been hanging on Nano's fundraise, not just AUO and not just because of Nvidia, whose cards are only intended for a small segment. Remember Samsung have said there's a supply shortage and have been considering freeing their patents. Given about 10% of NANO's stock will be admitted to the market at 18p soon (20% if you included the LOAM interest) why has the share price not dropped to just above 18p, say 20 or 22p? It can only because the market knows who the other buyer(s) are. Could they be industry heavyweights? ----- M1 Nano can't be valued accurately because of the inevitable lack of visibility. One can only to ask if it will be worth more or less when one is ready to exit and if it's worth the risks. I'd say that the raise has de-risked it almost completely and that we will see a far more bullish analysis from Edison after the vote next month.
06/10/2017
16:06
notimpressed: from shareprophets I noted in an update on Nanoco (NANO) last month that a “Commercial Supply and License Agreement” saw the shares bouncing a bit, but the key question remained when’s an attempted fundraising? (discounted, natch). Well, the company has now been “pleased to announce” a placing result and researcher Edison has updated… The initial fundraising announcement saw CEO Michael Edelman state that “the board appreciates the patience of shareholders and has worked hard to secure the terms of this important fundraising, which we believe to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders as a whole”. With also “pleased to announce”, a good deal secured then? There was a further announcement following the “Commercial Supply and License Agreement” before the placing – this that the company’s technology would be featured at Touch Taiwan 2017, “a leading show for the world's display industry… an estimated 30,000 visitors and more than 2,000 conference participants”, with a conference presentation from the company’s Senior VP of Global Sales addressing “the growing demand from manufacturers and consumers for quantum dots as a method of achieving wider color gamut and enhanced picture quality in the next generation of displays”. That puffery helped the shares retain a level of circa 29p – though that comparing to approaching 150p less than three years ago and indeed above 45p at the commencement of 2017. No wonder “the board appreciates the patience of shareholders”! And so the “pleased to announce” placing result… … “the company has successfully placed… new ordinary shares at a price of 18 pence per share to institutional investors”. You what? 18p! A 35% discount to the prior close and, with 47,655,821 new shares to be issued, representing a 20% increase in the issued share capital. What about those suckered in to investing before, on the back of the ‘news flow’ in the prior month? The share price has currently only responded down to 27p but the new shares are as yet to be admitted to trading – this with the fundraising conditional, including on General Meeting approval. The company though warns “if the resolutions are not passed by shareholders at the General Meeting and the fundraising does not proceed, the company will need to seek alternative sources of funding but, given the current stage of the company's development, this outcome is unlikely to be favourable to shareholders”. It adds “fundraising to fund the company beyond July 2019”, with Edison stating “Nanoco should have enough cash to last beyond July 2019, even in the absence of substantial volume orders”. However, the track record doesn’t inspire confidence – as suggested by the company reckoning it has had to ‘work hard’ to secure even these latest fundraising terms! Despite the dilution, Michael Edelman is “delighted we are set to secure the funding” - though I bet he is as otherwise it was cash crunch ahoy again. The stance remains sell.
25/9/2017
11:41
ih_418591: You're welcome. For disclosure, I am not a Nanoco investor, but I enjoy reading the posts on this board to keep abreast of info found by other investors here. I am a Quantum Materials Corp investor. I try to find info on this quantum dot market anywhere I can and I like to share info. I believe both Nanoco and QMC will have a part of the market in the near future. I had once thought about hedging my investment by investing in Nanoco as well, but I'm glad I didn't since it would have been at a much higher price than the current share price. I've been invested in QMC for over 4 years so their current share price doesn't bother me due to my low average cost.
08/9/2017
09:05
robstill: I haven't posted on this BB much before but have been a long term holder. I can confirm that is me all out. Probably part of the reason for the share price drop in the last hour! It was difficult to unload my total holding and I've crystalised significant losses having patiently stuck by Nanoco and been sucked in by the spin for the last 3.5 years. The reason for giving up now is simple, i no longer believe or trust the board and there is a total lack of information and transparency on which any sound decisions can be made and it is just not worth the amount of head space it is occupying trying to second guess it and worry about what is coming next. (i have felt this for a long time but have made the school boy mistake of letting my emotions get the better of me). Enough is enough. Take the supposed first commercial sale, where are the details? Even if they can't say who it is going to due to NDA's why can't they say the size of the deal? Either it was all made up (it feels like anything is possible) or it was so insignificantly small it would have been better to not announce a deal at all. Either way this last point really upsets me because it totally mislead investors and only a few weeks ago the share price was in the mid 40's as a result of it. I think the RoHS situation has changed things, not having converted Philips (and presumably TCL / Hisense) concerns me, maybe the product just isn't good enough. There will be delays in any sales as a result of RoHS and i have convinced myself they will need to raise more money somehow. Lesson learned, don't be greedy thinking you've spotted the next 10 bagger and never invest in a jam tomorrow stock! As a minimum they need to already be selling their product and making money! GLA.
07/9/2017
21:25
onething: Nano had a stab at a share price resurgence last summer and then came off the book at around 70p. It was clear at that stage that the news had exhausted its effect and the price would drop back. I didn't really think it would go right back to 40p, but it did, and then 30, and it looks like 20 and lower soon. This is horrific capital destruction for almost all shareholders. With more to come I expect. And yet this thread is still discussing the plethora of tellies about to appear and the riches that will result. It reminds me, with a horrible gnawing feeling in my gut, of times in the past when I also backed the 'story' and was blind to the shorts, the ever decreasing share price, the obfuscation by the board, the failed promises, the etc. People will point to the IP (a patent is worthless if the resulting technology cannot be commercialised), the cadmium ban (its clear there is more to this, to nanos detriment, than meets the eye), the sampling trials (oh please!), whatever. The fact is, it is, and has been for a good while, been going in one direction. Hindsight leads to the hand wringing realisation that selling at the first signs of unease would have been good. Desperation prevents selling now as there is an irrational feeling that despite the relentless downtrend only this share can be trusted to rebound to make up the losses. Selling and crystallising losses is too much of a reality check for most people. We are almost at 20p. Don't be fooled by the thought that the price is at the bottom and the only way is up. It could easily halve from here. As it has done rapidly from 40p which was such a long term bottom. Of course it could also double rapidly from here. And more. But the time to heed the signals was the failure of the rally at 70p. A long way from where we are now. Anyone else want to announce they are topping up at these low levels, or how cheap these shares are right now?
02/9/2017
11:59
balaura: The share that ME &co get for free are now subject to the achievement of performance conditions (one of them being, if I remember correctly, that the share price should be higher than 200p during 2018/19 :). "As set out in the Company's Annual Report, the vesting of the options is subject to the achievement of performance conditions based upon share price growth and revenue targets over the three year performance period commencing with Nanoco's 2016/2017 financial year. Ordinarily, the options will vest (subject to the achievement of the performance conditions) following the announcement of Nanoco's results for its 2018/2019 financial year and will be released to the participants following the end of a two year holding period."
14/8/2017
16:46
wigwammer: "All the new share holders that luckily jumped in at the low share price constant praising as they think they jumped aboard just before the sky rocket jump. Slowly start to understand the long term headache that is the nanoco silence."I bought in at the share price low. I will look to add on any funding related weakness.I don't have a headache.A few facts:- the nano IP has been in development for 20+ years.- it is the product of dozens of PhD specialists and leaders in the field.- NANO has relationships with some of the largest companies in the field - dow, merck, samsung.- cad free QD is the tech choice of the oem leader, samsung - NANO is one of very few companies capable of producing, with its partners, industrial scale volumes of cad free Qd's.- the valuation is circa 70%+ below peak.All these facts suggest they have a great chance of building a meaningful business, and a share price that will be highly leveraged to any progress made.If applying some intuition isn't your bag, and the only facts that motivate you are realised sales and profit and a fat balance sheet - then you can wait. Cost of doing so - the first 300-500% move.GLA!
22/7/2017
18:20
kuss1: Funny old comments from slippy.... thought this was going to 10p by Xmas 2015? Then 15p in a matter of months. Now if they can get a loan he might buy in! The management issue is an irrelevance to me. ME isn't great but he isn't a criminal as slippy suggests. It's the product that counts as I've posted many times. Remember Yell and all the great managers they employed? All came to nothing because the product was already history. Management is operational stuff, but with Nano it's the science. To say the Philip's deal is not important is nonsense. A first class OEM are buying nanoco's tech for their premier line of TV's and monitors. That validates the tech. It open's up the very real prospect of further orders. TCL and Hisense are next in line. I think there will be 3 major OEM's with Nano's tech in their flagship products come Xmas 2017. Dow have already said they have an operational large-scale plant in Korea with an existing cad free offering. That is major news. Nano expect a five fold increase in Dow production this year with confirmation of commercial orders imminent. Merck factory build is coming soon. They have no choice as the industry is accelerating. Merck used to dismiss Qdots but now they are fans because existing suppliers hate change being forced on them. Then they convert and champion the cause. 3M are out of the running, so are QD vision, so are Nanosys. Nanoco's main competitors are gone. Samsung has made a good fist of their cad free tech, but they don't own the IP and their components are semi carcinogenic. Hansol's scale up is not efficient and will eventually be phased out imo. As for the value of Nano's IP, you only have to look at what the Chinese were willing to pay for QD vision. Pretty much the market cap of Nanoco. And that was for a defunct technology. Really just for a few patents in fact. You really have to take an industry perspective which is often lacking on this board. Have some respect for the decisions of major players such as Dow, Merck and Wah Hong. They know their business. They know what's coming. Nano have made errors though. Mainly over-estimating the disruptive potential of Qdots. There is massive inertia in the industries they targeted. Because industry doesn't like change, a bit like Yell. But those companies in the end have to come into line. Look how BASF are now pro cadmium free products. They've had to change, just like Merck have done. Nano now of the verge of a transformation. The share price will follow.
04/7/2017
15:18
mwwh: AndrewBaker: Perhaps, you were referring to the past 6 years. Since the recent climb from 31.25 to 43.75,the share price has not fallen 'more and significantly'. Rather, it has dropped to the Fibonacci 67% range, which can be expected following a large gain. Though I suspect that it will bounce off of 67%, a drop to 50% of the gain would not be unreasonable before it continues its climb. We may receive good news or no news over the next month. I lean toward the former. Dow has likely sold dots to Kangde Xin and will confirm that soon. My biggest worry has been that Nanoco's technology become obsolete before it can reach the market. Happily, recent technology confirmation from Kyulux, Merck, Wah Hong and Samsung has clearly placed Nanoco in a technology leadership position. Quantum dot purchasers will want to be future-proofed, and Nanoco appears to offer this more than any other QD manufacturer. Companies inside and outside of the display industry will need to jump on board quickly or risk missing the boat. As I said when the price was 32, I don't care if the share price temporarily goes down. Nanoco, instead of focusing on immediate profit has given its scientists the opportunity to build a solid base. Not to criticize Dow, since Nanoco probably shares some blame, but Nanoco also deserves credit for successfully changing its strategy in the face of repeated Dow delays.
Nanoco share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:41 V: D:20171124 09:42:11