Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 33.00p 32.50p 33.25p - - - 0 06:41:48
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Technology Hardware & Equipment 0.5 -12.6 -4.5 - 78.61

Nanoco (NANO) Latest News

More Nanoco News
Nanoco Takeover Rumours

Nanoco (NANO) Share Charts

1 Year Nanoco Chart

1 Year Nanoco Chart

1 Month Nanoco Chart

1 Month Nanoco Chart

Intraday Nanoco Chart

Intraday Nanoco Chart

Nanoco (NANO) Discussions and Chat

Nanoco (NANO) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
2017-08-17 15:35:0633.002,703891.99UT
2017-08-17 15:26:4632.861,500492.97O
2017-08-17 15:09:1033.0035,00011,548.32O
2017-08-17 14:28:3532.863,000985.94O
2017-08-17 14:02:1632.863,042999.75O
View all Nanoco trades in real-time

Nanoco (NANO) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
17/8/2017
09:20
Nanoco Daily Update: Nanoco is listed in the Technology Hardware & Equipment sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 33p.
Nanoco has a 4 week average price of 32.50p and a 12 week average price of 30.75p.
The 1 year high share price is 74.75p while the 1 year low share price is currently 28.50p.
There are currently 238,224,606 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 290,413 shares. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £78,614,119.98.
14/8/2017
17:46
wigwammer: "All the new share holders that luckily jumped in at the low share price constant praising as they think they jumped aboard just before the sky rocket jump. Slowly start to understand the long term headache that is the nanoco silence."I bought in at the share price low. I will look to add on any funding related weakness.I don't have a headache.A few facts:- the nano IP has been in development for 20+ years.- it is the product of dozens of PhD specialists and leaders in the field.- NANO has relationships with some of the largest companies in the field - dow, merck, samsung.- cad free QD is the tech choice of the oem leader, samsung - NANO is one of very few companies capable of producing, with its partners, industrial scale volumes of cad free Qd's.- the valuation is circa 70%+ below peak.All these facts suggest they have a great chance of building a meaningful business, and a share price that will be highly leveraged to any progress made.If applying some intuition isn't your bag, and the only facts that motivate you are realised sales and profit and a fat balance sheet - then you can wait. Cost of doing so - the first 300-500% move.GLA!
10/8/2017
09:48
minsky: doubt it. Slippy joined this board a few years ago when the share price was well north of 100 and he was very enthusiastic about Nanoco's prospects. The company then did the fund raising at 105 and he appeared to feel betrayed by the management. He has been de-ramping ever since. That is not to say he has been irrational, given how the share price has performed.
07/8/2017
22:35
aimingupward2: Very good posts, kuss. Well expressed. And from you, too, tonsil re the 'blindness' of institutions. IQE, mentioned above, is another company which has undertaken many years of scientific research, aided by judicious acquisitions. They, too, have been true innovators and have patiently gone through many years of no net increase in their share price. Very probably there was plenty of investor bile directed at them on the way. In recent months , however, the share price has been gathering pace increasingly rapidly as the company's prospects over the coming months, and as far ahead as one can reasonably assess, are being thought to be dramatically good and enduring. Nano could very well follow a similar trajectory. They would deserve it.
22/7/2017
19:20
kuss1: Funny old comments from slippy.... thought this was going to 10p by Xmas 2015? Then 15p in a matter of months. Now if they can get a loan he might buy in! The management issue is an irrelevance to me. ME isn't great but he isn't a criminal as slippy suggests. It's the product that counts as I've posted many times. Remember Yell and all the great managers they employed? All came to nothing because the product was already history. Management is operational stuff, but with Nano it's the science. To say the Philip's deal is not important is nonsense. A first class OEM are buying nanoco's tech for their premier line of TV's and monitors. That validates the tech. It open's up the very real prospect of further orders. TCL and Hisense are next in line. I think there will be 3 major OEM's with Nano's tech in their flagship products come Xmas 2017. Dow have already said they have an operational large-scale plant in Korea with an existing cad free offering. That is major news. Nano expect a five fold increase in Dow production this year with confirmation of commercial orders imminent. Merck factory build is coming soon. They have no choice as the industry is accelerating. Merck used to dismiss Qdots but now they are fans because existing suppliers hate change being forced on them. Then they convert and champion the cause. 3M are out of the running, so are QD vision, so are Nanosys. Nanoco's main competitors are gone. Samsung has made a good fist of their cad free tech, but they don't own the IP and their components are semi carcinogenic. Hansol's scale up is not efficient and will eventually be phased out imo. As for the value of Nano's IP, you only have to look at what the Chinese were willing to pay for QD vision. Pretty much the market cap of Nanoco. And that was for a defunct technology. Really just for a few patents in fact. You really have to take an industry perspective which is often lacking on this board. Have some respect for the decisions of major players such as Dow, Merck and Wah Hong. They know their business. They know what's coming. Nano have made errors though. Mainly over-estimating the disruptive potential of Qdots. There is massive inertia in the industries they targeted. Because industry doesn't like change, a bit like Yell. But those companies in the end have to come into line. Look how BASF are now pro cadmium free products. They've had to change, just like Merck have done. Nano now of the verge of a transformation. The share price will follow.
04/7/2017
16:18
mwwh: AndrewBaker: Perhaps, you were referring to the past 6 years. Since the recent climb from 31.25 to 43.75,the share price has not fallen 'more and significantly'. Rather, it has dropped to the Fibonacci 67% range, which can be expected following a large gain. Though I suspect that it will bounce off of 67%, a drop to 50% of the gain would not be unreasonable before it continues its climb. We may receive good news or no news over the next month. I lean toward the former. Dow has likely sold dots to Kangde Xin and will confirm that soon. My biggest worry has been that Nanoco's technology become obsolete before it can reach the market. Happily, recent technology confirmation from Kyulux, Merck, Wah Hong and Samsung has clearly placed Nanoco in a technology leadership position. Quantum dot purchasers will want to be future-proofed, and Nanoco appears to offer this more than any other QD manufacturer. Companies inside and outside of the display industry will need to jump on board quickly or risk missing the boat. As I said when the price was 32, I don't care if the share price temporarily goes down. Nanoco, instead of focusing on immediate profit has given its scientists the opportunity to build a solid base. Not to criticize Dow, since Nanoco probably shares some blame, but Nanoco also deserves credit for successfully changing its strategy in the face of repeated Dow delays.
19/6/2017
21:21
kuss1: My understanding of the Dow blog that I recently posted was a comparative study surely and not a solution. The comparison between Dow's cad free dots and red cadmium dots from another supplier in relation to DCI colour specs given in blue. I read this as very positive; more so that it's coming from Dow. They've invested millions in Nano's tech. It's the same reason Merck got interested. Merck now sampling. I think they will commit to a factory build something this year. I think the fact that Wah Hong expect orders in the 3rd quarter to be also be very positive. 3rd quarter starts in a few weeks. Though orders are expected to be small that's not the point. Orders can grow. The infrastructure is in place. Nano such a tiny market cap for a key player in a new industry tied up with Dow and Merck. Qdots taking over the whole of display soon. New products every week almost. All cadmium based of course apart from Samsung. No evidence of any take up of Nanosys hybrid Qdots. But Nanosys are dead meat in the long run. They can't live just of Samsung's patent payments. Must be some 30-40 companies out there producing Qdots from various materials. Many cadmium free. All doomed if you ask me... As for the share price, it's going nowhere .. But it's still above where it was on the no orders statement in the last results!
19/6/2017
14:28
mwwh: Whoops! Missed the nano-sized elephant. I doubt that fake QMC will create better red dots than Nanoco by using a mass production technique. The upside is that QMC investors now have fake red dots as well as fake mass production. The truth is that Nanoco will either produce sales soon or will be bought out. I am not too concerned. I suspect that most of the whining one this site comes from QMC investors or from former Nano investors who want to see the share price go down.
12/5/2017
01:59
lauders: Some Positives: NANO's website is a good one and they do add news promptly when it comes along. Even the news feeds if registerd work well unlike some much larger companies! The Edison note provides 21 pages of hope and jam tomorrow reasons to invest. We all know the potential is here. Just needs LOTS of patience. There are a lot of patents and science in the company. The staff are also apparently rather talented. They just need the right leader (see below). Some Negatives: Their CEO is not really doing much for the company and his sales and other personal actions haven't inspired confidence. Perhaps new management is needed? That might do wonders for the share price. NANO's PR is useless. They don't push the boat out to get their name known. There are no useful updates on the progress being made with the dots. Commercial sensitivity is the excuse, which I accept to a degree, but still I am sure they can release more info than they do. The share price performance has been awful.
04/4/2017
10:50
boom boom bang bang: Chinese already paid 40% premium on first placement 0.315p 2nd placement at 40% today price is coming in the next 4 days. Agreed price is 0.38p. Chinese will buy 20% of shs capital at 0.38p Meaning we will spike pass 0.60p or more. Kodal Minerals PLC Placement and Off-Take Agreement 10/03/2017 7:00am UK Regulatory (RNS & others) Kodal Minerals (LSE:KOD) Historical Stock Chart 1 Month : From Mar 2017 to Apr 2017 Click Here for more Kodal Minerals Charts. TIDMKOD RNS Number : 0850Z Kodal Minerals PLC 10 March 2017 Kodal Minerals Plc / Index: AIM / Epic: KOD / Sector: Mining 10 March 2017 Kodal Minerals plc ('Kodal Minerals' or 'the Company') Completion of GBP500,000 Placing, Proposed Off-Take Agreement & Proposed GBP4.3 million Strategic Investment Kodal Minerals plc, the mineral exploration and development company focussed on West Africa, is pleased to advise that is has completed a GBP500,000 share placing (the "Placing") and entered into an agreement to commence negotiations for an off-take agreement for the future spodumene concentrate produced from its Bougouni Lithium Project, in Southern Mali (the "Project") as well as a potential further investment into the Company of up to GBP4.3 million (the "Agreement"). Highlights -- Agreement is with Suay Chin International Pte Ltd ("Suay Chin"), a Singapore registered company formed to take advantage of its extensive connections to supply the Chinese lithium market with a range of clients from acid producers to lithium carbonate producers and to the final lithium-ion battery manufacturer. -- Suay Chin has strong support from Shandong Mingrui Chemical Co Ltd, which is a long-term supplier to existing lithium carbonate producers in Shandong Province. -- GBP500,000 placing completed with Suay Chin at an issue price of GBP0.003 per share for the issue of 166,666,667 new ordinary shares of 0.03125 pence each in the Company (the "Placing Shares") - representing a 30% premium to the closing share price on the date prior to this announcement. -- The Company and Suay Chin have agreed to commence negotiations immediately for an off-take agreement over 20% of the spodumene concentrate to be produced from the Project, with potential for this to increase to 100% at a later date. -- The Agreement allows Suay Chin a period of 30 days to undertake due diligence on the Company and the Project, including conducting site visits, preliminary metallurgical testing and confirmation of geology. -- Following the due diligence period and if successful, the Agreement contemplates Suay Chin completing a second share placing within a further 15 days (or 30 days with Kodal's consent) to increase its shareholding in Kodal to 20% at a price of GBP0.0038 per share (expected to result in a further cash investment of approximately GBP4.3 million) (the "Second Placing"). The price of the proposed Second Placing represents a 65% premium to the closing share price on the date prior to this announcement .
01/4/2017
20:54
ih_169538: Maybe you should read the Bayer patents which they own outright and are broad based on many applications including EL.The problem with Syd is his rhetoric in regards to facts.Every other QD company has been disregarded as being able to produce cad free quantum dots and that Nano alone have this capability.QMC and ultimately Nano are not film manufacturers so having EL patents mean little to selling quantum dots.The selling of material to go into EL is an entirely different thing than making film that uses EL materials.As far as selling air I would say Nano is in the same bracket right now.Until they report revenues from mass sales ( KGs ) there isn't much to scream from the hilltops about and why the current share price reflects that current scenario.Nano will need revenue sources to offset expenditures pretty soon or be handing around the offering plate for collections.If non fact based comments are made then I will refute them.You have your Nano guys posting on QMC message boards info that they don't post here on competitors as an example or refute non factual post there and not here so I am returning the favor.In a perfect world QMC and Nano get 50/50 of the qd market supply ..we will see.GL on Tuesdays year end report,hope it answers why the delay to market and revenues.I think its all about "optimizing" their materials which is a larger feat than most think.
Nanoco share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:43 V: D:20170818 06:48:47