ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

21.00
0.10 (0.48%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.10 0.48% 21.00 20.75 21.45 22.00 20.75 20.85 1,576,703 16:35:02
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 6.12 67.91M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 20.90p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 24.40p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £68.88 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.21.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 22326 to 22347 of 54700 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  904  903  902  901  900  899  898  897  896  895  894  893  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
07/11/2016
10:06
Those samples enough for 200,000 TVs. And it's increasing..

And Dow don't do face-saving. They'd fire everyone and close down the factory if it had no future..

kuss1
07/11/2016
10:04
I went to a store once, long before apple had its own shops. I'll never forget the guy who showed me the new Apple iPod. He actually said he didn't understand why it was so popular. When Apple released the iPhone the sharemarket said "yeah, whatever". The market is made up of that people just like that sales guy. As for the validation of CFQD - Samsung's results are all over Amazon. Go check out the ratings. Nanoco's dots are just as good as Hansol's if not better.
fil340
07/11/2016
09:59
Slip, that's $4 million to Dow just for samples, from who?
You don't know your industry. Samsung's QDot TVs outselling everything. New version out in Jan. Nothing on the market can match them.

kuss1
07/11/2016
09:52
Kuss

300000 for Dow wouldnt even cover 1 directors salary.

It is quite literally peanuts. Dow are more interested in saving their credibilty.

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
09:49
All

Ask yourself this. Why are dot manufacturers stock prices at all time lows???????

Because they are all about to be the next ARM or Apple???? Of course not. It is because the tech doesnt convince!! Period. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it usually is a duck. Or in this case a turkey.

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
09:47
Dow don't do charity. That £300000 Payne to Nano = $4 million to Dow. So someone's paying. Qdots are here to stay, ask Samsung. To assume Dow/Merck can't match Hansol is misguided
kuss1
07/11/2016
09:42
This may hit sub 40 today.
slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
09:40
Dow sign contracts to save face now? And there is a technology roadmap better than that for QD (film->filter->;on-chip)? Slippy, you can do better. Stop thrashing. The only thing in your favour is the shareprice, and the market will correct that (and you) in due course.
fil340
07/11/2016
09:32
Fil

My take is that both had invested so much in terms of money and credibility that they both needed a way out pdq as the clock was ticking. It is my belief that a face saving excercise was then put into action.

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
09:28
The exclusive agreement with Dow was an attempt to outearn in the short term. It remains surprising that Samsung have priced their high-end so far below OLED, especially given the very positive market response to their sets. Mindful of Samsung's strategy, and the knockback obviously, it was in Dow's & Nanoco's interests to lighten the load, to allow Dow to offer cheaper dots. And all IP Licensing agreements come with performance requirements, allowing termination of contract in the event of non-performance. A redo of the contract was a great result for Dow and Nanoco, and boosted my confidence that Nanoco's CFQD's will be in a telly store near you, very, very soon.
fil340
07/11/2016
09:07
All

Be extremely wary of thinking Nanoco is a sure thing. It is not and may never be.

I would like the opportunity to question ME over a myriad of issues.

I have my view here. Why did Dow even allow Nanoco to negotiate renewed terms of liscence? If Nanoco is what you guys say it is, it would quite simply be business malpractice for Dow to allow Nanoco to market their wares to all and sundry.

And what about the lighting division. I will tell you what? Nothing!

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
09:07
Bagpuss sold all his shares remember. He is trying to drum down the price to buy back lower. He love nano thats why he posts. He just got phuqed like the rest of us and trying to lower his average.
mrplay
07/11/2016
09:06
Dow made a $300k royalty payment to nanoco for quarter ending June '16 - attributed to increased sampling activity. Nanoco have 2 weekly rotation of staff working with Wah Hong and upwards through their supply chain. Merck trialling technology, sampling clients and anticipating orders for which they are due to announce their own production facilities. All TV manufacturers developing QD augmented panels with understandable preference for cadmium free qds including the Chinese. Nanoco remains best potential investment in qd tech - all for the reasons cited - highest capacity, composition, reproducibility. In <12 months you have gone from 0->$100k/month, WH produced qdef, 500kg production capacity ex Runcorn (at effectively no capital outlay I might add) and Merck licensing agreement /possible production. Speculation can be fun but facts speak for themselves....
howl01
07/11/2016
09:01
ME will be there and he'll be at the AGM .

Still waiting for those two board replacements you promised slip and the large institutional selling.

ME also concluded the Wah Hong and Merck deals.

Bagpuss, I find it odd that you are treating Dow like a small cap player with incompetent management. OK they've been slow, or the industry has been slow to take up the tech, but they are not fools as you suggest. And they haven't given up on Qdots, though it seems you have..

kuss1
07/11/2016
08:59
SSW -> asked ADVFN to investigate your claims. Thanks
mr.oz
07/11/2016
08:59
Kuss

If they dont keep up the illusion it is game over. I am with Bagpuss.

What was previously produced was just not up to the job. The company is noe playing catch up behind the all is well facade.

Just look at the chart. It is like a catastrophe.

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
08:55
Bagpuss

I think your rationale is bang on the button. It will all come out in the wash. I am of the view ME will not be at the helm much longer.

slipperysidewinder
07/11/2016
08:54
OK so why did they just reappoint a business manager? If there's no future as you say?

I thought their factory was completed in Jan of 2016, that's not 2013.

kuss1
07/11/2016
08:53
SSW: It's usual to pay suppliers 30 days after delivery & 60 days is not unheard of. Cash burn is always a concern with pre-revenue companies like Nanoco, and if a cash call is needed I would have expected to hear of it already; nb needing more cash is marked up as elevated risk in the 2016 annual report. Given cash concerns it would be negligent of the board to ignore the issue of redunancies so I would expect those plans to be in place. If redundancies are going to be proceeding then no doubt it will be with respect to some research staff as the business focus is now coming online ie production & revenue. This is, frankly, fine, as right at the minute I couldn't give a monkey's about solar or bio, or lighting either. I am skeptical of product sitting on shelves as they are making samples to order.

To sum: all in all the stuff you have reported smacks of low-level insider intelligence.

fil340
07/11/2016
08:53
When we're we first told that product based on Nano tech was being "sampled"?
bagpuss67
07/11/2016
08:49
They have had a business manager for years. I'm amazed that you defend the progress Dow have made since they licenced this tech in 2013.
bagpuss67
07/11/2016
08:41
Bagpuss67,

If Dow haven't managed to commercialise why have they just appointed a business manager for Qdots? Why are trevista Qdots still advertised on the Dow site? Why are royalties being paid from Dow?

If Nano's dots are not saleable why did Merck and Wah Hong pay upfront licensing fees?

Regarding QTMM, their share price is worst than Nano's. They seem to be in the eternal sampling world as well. But they don't have Dow, Merch and Wah Hong shouldering the burden.

Science moves ahead. Hansol and Samsung seem to have made a fist of the tech with batch production, see if Dow/Merck and Nano can is all...

kuss1
Chat Pages: Latest  904  903  902  901  900  899  898  897  896  895  894  893  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock