We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.10 | 0.48% | 21.00 | 20.75 | 21.45 | 22.00 | 20.75 | 20.85 | 1,576,703 | 16:35:02 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0343 | 6.12 | 67.91M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/11/2016 10:06 | Those samples enough for 200,000 TVs. And it's increasing.. And Dow don't do face-saving. They'd fire everyone and close down the factory if it had no future.. | kuss1 | |
07/11/2016 10:04 | I went to a store once, long before apple had its own shops. I'll never forget the guy who showed me the new Apple iPod. He actually said he didn't understand why it was so popular. When Apple released the iPhone the sharemarket said "yeah, whatever". The market is made up of that people just like that sales guy. As for the validation of CFQD - Samsung's results are all over Amazon. Go check out the ratings. Nanoco's dots are just as good as Hansol's if not better. | fil340 | |
07/11/2016 09:59 | Slip, that's $4 million to Dow just for samples, from who? You don't know your industry. Samsung's QDot TVs outselling everything. New version out in Jan. Nothing on the market can match them. | kuss1 | |
07/11/2016 09:52 | Kuss 300000 for Dow wouldnt even cover 1 directors salary. It is quite literally peanuts. Dow are more interested in saving their credibilty. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 09:49 | All Ask yourself this. Why are dot manufacturers stock prices at all time lows??????? Because they are all about to be the next ARM or Apple???? Of course not. It is because the tech doesnt convince!! Period. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it usually is a duck. Or in this case a turkey. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 09:47 | Dow don't do charity. That £300000 Payne to Nano = $4 million to Dow. So someone's paying. Qdots are here to stay, ask Samsung. To assume Dow/Merck can't match Hansol is misguided | kuss1 | |
07/11/2016 09:42 | This may hit sub 40 today. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 09:40 | Dow sign contracts to save face now? And there is a technology roadmap better than that for QD (film->filter-> | fil340 | |
07/11/2016 09:32 | Fil My take is that both had invested so much in terms of money and credibility that they both needed a way out pdq as the clock was ticking. It is my belief that a face saving excercise was then put into action. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 09:28 | The exclusive agreement with Dow was an attempt to outearn in the short term. It remains surprising that Samsung have priced their high-end so far below OLED, especially given the very positive market response to their sets. Mindful of Samsung's strategy, and the knockback obviously, it was in Dow's & Nanoco's interests to lighten the load, to allow Dow to offer cheaper dots. And all IP Licensing agreements come with performance requirements, allowing termination of contract in the event of non-performance. A redo of the contract was a great result for Dow and Nanoco, and boosted my confidence that Nanoco's CFQD's will be in a telly store near you, very, very soon. | fil340 | |
07/11/2016 09:07 | All Be extremely wary of thinking Nanoco is a sure thing. It is not and may never be. I would like the opportunity to question ME over a myriad of issues. I have my view here. Why did Dow even allow Nanoco to negotiate renewed terms of liscence? If Nanoco is what you guys say it is, it would quite simply be business malpractice for Dow to allow Nanoco to market their wares to all and sundry. And what about the lighting division. I will tell you what? Nothing! | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 09:07 | Bagpuss sold all his shares remember. He is trying to drum down the price to buy back lower. He love nano thats why he posts. He just got phuqed like the rest of us and trying to lower his average. | mrplay | |
07/11/2016 09:06 | Dow made a $300k royalty payment to nanoco for quarter ending June '16 - attributed to increased sampling activity. Nanoco have 2 weekly rotation of staff working with Wah Hong and upwards through their supply chain. Merck trialling technology, sampling clients and anticipating orders for which they are due to announce their own production facilities. All TV manufacturers developing QD augmented panels with understandable preference for cadmium free qds including the Chinese. Nanoco remains best potential investment in qd tech - all for the reasons cited - highest capacity, composition, reproducibility. In <12 months you have gone from 0->$100k/month, WH produced qdef, 500kg production capacity ex Runcorn (at effectively no capital outlay I might add) and Merck licensing agreement /possible production. Speculation can be fun but facts speak for themselves.... | howl01 | |
07/11/2016 09:01 | ME will be there and he'll be at the AGM . Still waiting for those two board replacements you promised slip and the large institutional selling. ME also concluded the Wah Hong and Merck deals. Bagpuss, I find it odd that you are treating Dow like a small cap player with incompetent management. OK they've been slow, or the industry has been slow to take up the tech, but they are not fools as you suggest. And they haven't given up on Qdots, though it seems you have.. | kuss1 | |
07/11/2016 08:59 | SSW -> asked ADVFN to investigate your claims. Thanks | mr.oz | |
07/11/2016 08:59 | Kuss If they dont keep up the illusion it is game over. I am with Bagpuss. What was previously produced was just not up to the job. The company is noe playing catch up behind the all is well facade. Just look at the chart. It is like a catastrophe. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 08:55 | Bagpuss I think your rationale is bang on the button. It will all come out in the wash. I am of the view ME will not be at the helm much longer. | slipperysidewinder | |
07/11/2016 08:54 | OK so why did they just reappoint a business manager? If there's no future as you say? I thought their factory was completed in Jan of 2016, that's not 2013. | kuss1 | |
07/11/2016 08:53 | SSW: It's usual to pay suppliers 30 days after delivery & 60 days is not unheard of. Cash burn is always a concern with pre-revenue companies like Nanoco, and if a cash call is needed I would have expected to hear of it already; nb needing more cash is marked up as elevated risk in the 2016 annual report. Given cash concerns it would be negligent of the board to ignore the issue of redunancies so I would expect those plans to be in place. If redundancies are going to be proceeding then no doubt it will be with respect to some research staff as the business focus is now coming online ie production & revenue. This is, frankly, fine, as right at the minute I couldn't give a monkey's about solar or bio, or lighting either. I am skeptical of product sitting on shelves as they are making samples to order. To sum: all in all the stuff you have reported smacks of low-level insider intelligence. | fil340 | |
07/11/2016 08:53 | When we're we first told that product based on Nano tech was being "sampled"? | bagpuss67 | |
07/11/2016 08:49 | They have had a business manager for years. I'm amazed that you defend the progress Dow have made since they licenced this tech in 2013. | bagpuss67 | |
07/11/2016 08:41 | Bagpuss67, If Dow haven't managed to commercialise why have they just appointed a business manager for Qdots? Why are trevista Qdots still advertised on the Dow site? Why are royalties being paid from Dow? If Nano's dots are not saleable why did Merck and Wah Hong pay upfront licensing fees? Regarding QTMM, their share price is worst than Nano's. They seem to be in the eternal sampling world as well. But they don't have Dow, Merch and Wah Hong shouldering the burden. Science moves ahead. Hansol and Samsung seem to have made a fist of the tech with batch production, see if Dow/Merck and Nano can is all... | kuss1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions