Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[ajrgy1] 20/3/2017 11:07

Fingers crossed for the eggs in other basket's!! This is seriously testing my resolve on holding, where's your PR Nanoco?????????? Tempted to take the 20 minute drive to Runcorn and knock on the door, though half of me would expect to see the gates locked and the windows boarded up!!!

[jfacwc] 20/3/2017 11:01

always something to worry about then!

[onething] 20/3/2017 10:55

A different technology emerging and seemingly being implemented while Nanoco is watching its first mover advantage move nowhere. The other comment in that article above that worried me was Samsung cancelling its OLED programme. However wonderful these new technologies seem at the outset (quantum dots is a case in point) if the technology proves too expensive to reliably implement, or consistent quality cannot be achieved, it will be dropped in favour of something that works.

[notimpressed] 20/3/2017 10:53

ajrgy, that is my understanding as well, think it might be
a bit of slick marketing by LG to counter Samsung's success in
cfqd display.

[ajrgy1] 20/3/2017 10:43

At a risk of sounding thick, nano cells have absolutely nothing to do with quantum dots???

[roadster750] 20/3/2017 10:02

sp spread very tight this morning and cant buy quantity without negotiated trade normally indicates upward demand.

[firminator1] 19/3/2017 11:30

Hey Syd I am still here and still naively hoping for the golden nugget that moves this share price
Surely the fact share price has been stable around 40p for ages now is good news. We will know soon enough in 3 weeks 4th April !!

[mr.oz] 19/3/2017 09:20

In my view, ME doesn't see this as a business, let alone a plc
Zero visibility, zero accountability, nothing will happen if and when revenues fail to materialise in the projected amounts at the times guided upon by company /broker

It's like an AIM scam on the main listing

Hope I'm wrong

[lauders] 19/3/2017 05:03

Due some news here Mr. ME surely? Shame the company is so poor on the news/PR side. Some things never appear to change.

[syd7777] 19/3/2017 03:58

Unfortunately Cadium sulphide will continue to progress even if it's not in the display industry.

[syd7777] 19/3/2017 03:42

The absence of Slippy and the 40 range seems to indicate a potential upturn.There is no doubt Howls post has highlighted the partners Nanoco are working with and I'm sure PC and Firm will be back with us soon,while Bags will see the light and recover as this will be a £1 billion company by 2019.

[howl01] 19/3/2017 02:26

Tonsil - you do realise the recommendation of the consultation is to to extend the exemption? Perverse but true.

[a.fewbob] 18/3/2017 23:25

Hey, i try.

[a.fewbob] 18/3/2017 21:15

I had a bag of vomit in one and and a nanoco share Cert in the other.

I offered one or the other to a man sleeping in a cardboard box under a bridge.

He took the bag...

[tonsil] 18/3/2017 13:30

Two large German companies with lots of clout! So you reckon the RoHS decision will go to 100% CFQD. It's a reassuring thought backed by a good bit of analysis.

[roadster750] 18/3/2017 12:35

H, thanks for that post, for me the gamechanger in this sordid situation is the following excerpt

Merck have invested in Cadmium-free QD technology and are considering locations for aproduction plant. Merck do not support the extension of Exemption 39.
BASF no longer support the extension of Exemption 39. Their investment in QD Vision has ended
since that company stopped trading, so their position has changed since the review.

The die is cast, imho.

[howl01] 18/3/2017 11:47

Andy - I'd say everything pivots on the decision to extend the exemption or not - not least near-term adoption by the Chinese, Merck production facility confirmation and Dow production ramp. The value of the company diminishes by the day as competitors advance their own technology. I don't know that it's so much an issue of cost advantage from Nanosys/3M, rather they have the established relationships, reputation, development, security etc etc. Reputation is everything in the chemical world and nanoco has yet to prove itself. Dow the enigma as always - to me it appears they have maybe ignored the QDEF phase and focused the on on-chip and QDCF development.?

[andycapped] 18/3/2017 10:20

An interesting letter Howl01. The tone of the letter does come across somewhat that unless the exemption is removed, CFQD is perhaps uncompetitive on cost grounds?

Nanosys have a large production facility, and with their 3M partners, it's a potent competitor.

[notimpressed] 18/3/2017 09:47

andy re post 10595, there is no logical reason why nano
would not be shouting from the rooftops if phillips were using
nano product.

[sd_anon] 18/3/2017 09:47

Noticed on the John Lewis website, Samsung QLEDs available from 29th March. I know they're not Nanoco dots but still positive to see the QD display industry as a whole develop. Philips 8 series launching at IFA in September.