Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[mr.oz] 17/2/2017 14:21

People getting excited about a Sept16 article and another a month old.

7-8million revenue coming soon ..... really?

[andycapped] 17/2/2017 14:15

I would think we'd be into the 2020's before QD's find their way into medical applications. It will be display that makes the money initially at least.

[mrplay] 17/2/2017 14:05

Check out chatter on lse. Looks like a Hisense tv release soon. If true why do nanoco never release info. This could be the first production model. Finally. But why do they stay quiet.

[onething] 17/2/2017 13:55

Think how many years it has taken to commercialise Display.R&D must continue into other applications, but it's fruits in the medical arena are far from ripe and are likely to be many years away still.

[notimpressed] 17/2/2017 13:48

wjs , you are correct, but without income from display
they will be facing an uphill struggle to survive.

[tonsil] 17/2/2017 12:54

did I see a sudden twitch in the corpse?

[wjs81] 17/2/2017 12:35

On the 10th Feb 2017, Nanoco registered all of the following domain names:
Nanocolifesciences.com/.co.uk
Nanocols.com/.co.uk
Medicalvivodots.com/.co.uk
Biocompatibledots.com/.co.uk
Biovivodots.com/.co.uk
Nanocovivodots.com/.co.uk

It's not just about the TV's, this is far from a dead duck......

[luxaeterna1] 17/2/2017 11:44

The only info I can find on Wah Hong shipped is the digitimes report behind the paywall. Headline self explanatory though.

hxxp://www.digitimes.com/tag/wah_hong_industrial/0014558.html

July 25th 2016: "Wah Hong Industrial to start Cd-free QDEF production in 4Q16".

I believe Taiwan use calendar year, so they may have been running for a month or so, barring some inevitable minor production delays.

[andrewbaker] 17/2/2017 11:16

Well, my sell order is there to catch the few optimistic souls still willing to back NANO at 45p. I'll still lose, but not so much, and am betting it'll reach 45p. before it totally collapses. Let's see what happens ...

[syd7777] 17/2/2017 10:51

Yes WH shares are now trading at a year high,there seems to be good news coming shortly for them.Up 8% on last trade.

[luxaeterna1] 17/2/2017 10:20

You're right, Wah Hong share price is up 20-25% over the last fortnight.

Wonder what's going on over there - leaky TV manufacturers expecting good news on new contracts perhaps?

[notimpressed] 17/2/2017 09:13

For now it looks as though whoever was clearing a line
of stock, has achieved their objective, as volume much lower today.
We need confirmation of orders to turn this stock around.
ME stated, backed up by Peel Hunt that revenue to July would be
circa 7-8 mill. 20 weeks left, if not achieved there
will be carnage.

[howl01] 17/2/2017 06:47

WH share price relevant? Couple of spikes and up above Nano license news..

[onething] 16/2/2017 23:10

The only takeaway from today is the close below 40p. Psychological. And the continuation of the downtrend. There has been no news, so I can't see anything positive. Although some have tried.

[mwwh] 16/2/2017 22:41

Nanoco's volume was not earthshaking, but relatively high compared to recent days. Definitely not 'takeover' strong. Hunt Peel's continued recommendation hopefully confirms improving Nanoco prospects. It would be completely irresponsible to recommend Nanoco if they foresaw continued commercial frustration and the need for additional funding (though this has not stopped Canaccord Genuity or Liberum). Slippery, you have been more successful than anyone in predicting Nanoco movement, but your dislike of Nanoco may be affecting your objectivity. Do you have any direct information?

[syd7777] 16/2/2017 21:24

We need Enteletons comment as he/she sees through the fog.While our NT was predicting a harami candle engulfing a few weeks back at 44

[notimpressed] 16/2/2017 21:08

When nanoco could claim world and technology leader status
it was easy to sell the company. Time and competition have eroded their
USP. they are no longer world leaders in the technology if indeed they ever were.
this does n't necessarily mean they have an unmarketable product, but as time
moves on it becomes become more difficult to compete(on price and technological
superiority) against established players(Samsung).
They really do need to prove they are capable of a market offering which
justifies all the hyperbole from the company about their superior product.

[syd7777] 16/2/2017 20:00

Howl01 you can almost guarantee good return at 36 if they go below that as the percentage back even to 44 is massive

[howl01] 16/2/2017 19:54

In other investor's frustrations lies opportunity for others - undervalued in my opinion at present given the potential - if the weakness persists into next week I'll be topping up.

[syd7777] 16/2/2017 19:49

Mwwh hope it wasn't a tree shake before a takeover.Mercks board meeting coming up later a bit later then usual.24th FEB a decision time when they get togheather for all the avenues going forward.

[mwwh] 16/2/2017 18:52

Despite today's decline, there was a silver lining. The heavier trade volumes occurred during the upswings. The downswing volumes were very low.

[mr.oz] 16/2/2017 17:55

Fair comment imv
All could be so different with an effective Board

[andrewbaker] 16/2/2017 17:50

Well, I've had it, after so long. This business is doing well at keeping poor directors and staff in a living at shareholders' expense; but useless at selling product or promoting the company in a positive way. I've now got a large sell order on at 45p. per share (a sizeable loss on buying price), so those of you who think this is a good business may now buy plenty of cheap shares. Pardon me if I don't hold my breath. This'll test the market: if the price is too low, my shares will be taken up within the week, whilst if not, there will be a few more deciding to get out before the price drops any more: and then let's see if there will be any takers.

This is me from now on: where I'm holding stock in businesses that seem just there to fleece shareholders while the bosses line their pockets, I'll do what I can to upset their apple cart. Too many rubbish (so-called) business people making money from honest decent shareholders; and that needs to change.

Remuneration committees and similar need to pay only what people are worth; and it's nonsense to say pay has to be so much else companies will lose staff: in so many cases they should go, as they are no bloody good anyway, and who else will want them?!