||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
|Technology Hardware & Equipment
Nanoco Share Discussion Threads
Showing 26276 to 26298 of 26300 messages
|syd, you need to put more water with it|
|I will not tolerate hackers and I know who you are and you are blocked on my FB and messenger.Hardrider8!|
|It doesn't work for Cd-free dots.|
|It's all batch or semi automated and in the long term not able to invigorate the industry.True scale is tonnage which is attainable through" FLOW CHEMISTRY" not batch.
"Flow chemistry is the pumping of a continuous flow of dissolved reaction mixture through a reactor. ... Performing chemistry this way leads to a number of advantages over standard batch processes."
|Lets hope it wasn't built by Harland and Wolff!
I don't believe you can be forced to sell shares, and any bidder would have to make an offer that is acceptable and attractive to the majority of shareholders to be successful.
Bearing mind many shareholders probably bought in at multiples of the present price, I would say a bid would have to be of a decent amount to stand a chance of being taken seriously.|
|If another company were to make a bid for nanoco, what would happen to the current shareholders?|
|Minsky, apposite and succinct. Lets hope nanoco
read this bb and take on board the views being expressed.|
|Not 100% sure Nanosys win contracts on performance quality alone. So far mostly they have been winning because they just went to a 10% royalty commission model and licensed the production out to 5-6 companies (3M, Hitachi, Hansol, etc.). Whereas Nanoco had a 25% commission with Dow, so were comparatively expensive. Plus Nanosys don't have any CFQD do they? Only "lower cadmium".|
|Its not just price. Visual and physical quality and reliability are probably just as important. For a company whose products emit light, they're doing a good job of keeping us in the dark.|
|on a casual glance basis, the nanosys offering at ces was superior to
nanoco's presence by a country mile. it does n't matter how
good the product, without effective marketing it will flounder.|
|Sooo, the question is, does the 'cold reactor' Nanoco process work out cheaper and more scalable than the Nanosys/Samsung production system?|
|As usual - who knows what's going on. Nanosys claim they are supplying Hisense.
But who knows. Hisense could be dual-sourcing.
|Mr play - the Hisense uses 3m qdef (Nanosys) I believe (as does Sharp's 9000 series)|
|That's right notimpressed, you've been reiterating that same point on revenue in just about every post you've made since creating that rather witty pseudonym.
I think we all acknowledge your extremely valid point but in the absence of their sales ledger it's clearly going to be a waiting game.|
|People getting excited about a Sept16 article and another a month old.
7-8million revenue coming soon ..... really?|
|I would think we'd be into the 2020's before QD's find their way into medical applications. It will be display that makes the money initially at least.|
|Check out chatter on lse. Looks like a Hisense tv release soon. If true why do nanoco never release info. This could be the first production model. Finally. But why do they stay quiet.|
|Think how many years it has taken to commercialise Display.R&D must continue into other applications, but it's fruits in the medical arena are far from ripe and are likely to be many years away still.|
|wjs , you are correct, but without income from display
they will be facing an uphill struggle to survive.|
|did I see a sudden twitch in the corpse?|
|On the 10th Feb 2017, Nanoco registered all of the following domain names:
It's not just about the TV's, this is far from a dead duck......|