We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitise | MONI | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 3.09 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.09 | 3.09 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 19/12/2017 12:13 by celeritas Plus over 22m in cash moni had, never mind the tax losses fiserv will utilise. |
Posted at 25/8/2017 13:57 by stud-muffin I thought you had called it right Exb.Please allow the many good folk on here a little sympathy - this has been a con job. A trawl through the endless Moni Bull Sh*t would amply prove investors here were not greedy or reckless just maybe a little too gullible. Beyond that once again British management proves itself to be over paid and almost entirely without any discernible talent beyond self gratification. Little wonder we slip ever down the economic ladder - by population size (per capita) we now rest in the low 20's of the top nations - once we were number 1! |
Posted at 23/8/2017 14:42 by celeritas Who is going to sign a Finkit deal with ownership up in the air. Even if it falls through doubts will exist moni have the clout and intention to fulfill requirements. |
Posted at 22/8/2017 13:10 by stud-muffin MTB - got to disagree.Exb reads like he knows what he is talking about and I do not read a bias. Truth is we have been royally conned here ( I sold out between 2.82 and 3.03p with a big five figure loss). I was always aware of the duplicity of AIM statements but even by the markets low standards MONI have rung the bell. No white knight here - all the IBM/Santander talk was just that - no one wants any of the company. A fire sale - pretty much a certainty if Fiserv walk will not deliver the rewards some here and LSE believe. This goes through it will be 3.1p but I cannot discount the Cavendish 3.4p might be the final number - hence the big buyers in the market hoping they can reach a tipping point in favour. |
Posted at 19/8/2017 13:01 by timbob2000 Missile & MTB4: Agreed, as a long term holder here I think it's important to put things into perspective, obviously just recently we have been told of doom and gloom by the Moni board and Fiserv, however I cannot help but see Fiserv's interest as a real positive, and one which I think if handled correctly could have a substantial impact on Moni's outlook. If Fiserv were to take out a licence on FinKIT and then use there substantial clout and business relationships I could see things getting very interesting, and infact Fiserv becoming a powerful partner for Monitise. Of course Fiserv may have there own separate plan and agenda which includes none of the above. My only real problem though is whether our illustrious board can see past there own noses for a moment and start to think long term again. |
Posted at 06/7/2017 14:31 by mikethebike4 iDinvestment Dave 6 Jul '17 - 11:29 - 21518 of 21525 0 0 Mike there is a 3 week bloody gap in those posts lol since then I have traded many many times. I now have 13 million as added just over 1m yesterday. My holding positions change daily. I have orders in the market right now so this total position may change by close of play today. Either way tempered to vote yes as I'm sure the BOD would screw shareholders if a no vote - Dave why are you bothering to trade on such such a tiny percentage rise/fall (if you are lucky) when there are umpteen other ramping oportunities out there in the market ? investment Dave 6 Jul '17 - 11:33 - 21520 of 21525 0 0 How about we meet up in London next week (monitise shareholders get together) and I will show positions and trading ideas and techniques etc. Also share some good software and platforms - anybody tempted ? - bear in mind that this is the Walter Mitty trader extraordinaire who endlessly ramped moni, bringing in others to the share who should have known better and will do in the future - he would never turn up mtb4 |
Posted at 13/6/2017 12:22 by lefrene Fiserve is what Moni pretended to be in the making, but thanks to spectacular business ineptitude, AL was too incompetent to deliver. Hence Ms Buse parachuted in, who no doubt once appraised of the full breadth and depth of the incompetence and onerous contracts, decided to leg it. I suppose the lesson is only to invest in US companies where regulations are much tighter, and nasty penalties await rogue directors. Fiserve will get many years of expertise/patents and a business on the brink of profits, and will probably be able to lever Moni cash in hand to pay for it! A proven tech effectively for free. One can only hope that some other big hitter might run the slide rule over Moni, and decide it's worth a bit more than the Fiserve offer.What doesn't make sense is that LC has struggled with this to see out the onerous contracts and to deliver FINkit and improve the content business. Why throw the towel in now when it seems that Moni is close to being in profit? |
Posted at 22/5/2017 18:57 by lefrene k3vmc, Moni may be bright techies but on their track record are dreadful at business. On the scale of IBM/Amazon they are of course small fry and have only burnt their way through about £100m to as yet generate visible profit. The mistake would seem to be that they set out to be a service provider to an industry that is doing it's best to avoid their product, despite the fact that the industry needs it, and needs it now. Moni have their media offering which does seem to be picking up traction, but they seem not to have explored other avenues where they would not be beholden to gate keepers.There may be a tipping point with the banks, and Moni enjoy a cascade of business, or this situation may drag on as the banks try to dodge/delay/fudge psd2. It's the uncertainty that either makes this company very cheap, or reflects it's real value. I have witnessed managers in large industries and government departments 'freeze up' because they know they do not have current skills, and yet have the authority to block change. They fear the consequences of making a mistake for which they can be blamed. In the banks I dare say managers also fear conflict with their own IT managers, especially as the IT people know their managers won't understand the tech. Thank you for concerning yourself with what I may think, I think you will continue to make gratuitously rude remarks to strangers, k3vmc! |
Posted at 22/5/2017 16:26 by k3vmc IBM spent billions on Bluemix and datacentres, teue.FINKit runs on Bluemix. FINKit is marketed jointly be IBM and MONI. IBM took hundreds of MONI staff. IBM did not spend anything on MONI. |
Posted at 22/5/2017 16:24 by lefrene The important thing about IBM is that it has a long history of being a safe and reliable enabler to the banking industry, thus no one is going to get sacked for delegating to IBM, whereas Moni hardly has a track record. Yet this close relationship with IBM seems not to add value to Moni, although perhaps it's the reason why Moni hasn't disappeared altogether? |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
