ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

MUBL Mbl Group Plc

3.50
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 00:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Mbl Group Plc LSE:MUBL London Ordinary Share GB00B0W48T45 ORD 7.5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 3.50 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Mbl Share Discussion Threads

Showing 4976 to 4996 of 5275 messages
Chat Pages: 211  210  209  208  207  206  205  204  203  202  201  200  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
08/1/2013
09:33
Well that's not going to happen because of the Allan family's effective control. Can't see them accepting the dilution of a funding nor putting any fresh cash into it themselves. If it goes anywhere, it goes private surely? They'll look after their own here, so Lisa and Peter Cowgill are on the 'inside' and I, personally, would look at Lisa's recent share purchase in that light. They won't be so keen to look after the rest of you though IMHO.
jeffian
08/1/2013
09:00
Well the fact is that they are losing money at the rate of £2m pa and I don't really see any prospect of that improving.

IMV the only hope for them to continue to pay themselves in the longer term is if they manage to effect a decent sized acquisition.

The only problem is that if this were to happen you wouldn't want these monkeys in charge of it.

Given the appalling record of misjudgements of this management these must be some of the most valueless director buys on the market.

kimboy2
08/1/2013
08:53
... because it's burning £1m in 6 months on loss-making operations ?
giant steps
08/1/2013
08:49
Why would a company with 3 mil of cash need funding gs ?
34simon
08/1/2013
08:47
"The only problem is that MUBL has been smoke and mirrors for so long that it is impossible to know whether it is a genuine buy or whether she has been put up to it."


I suspect a put up ahead of funding.


Reminder
How come the chairman was able to buy (29/10/2012) during close period ?

Can they be trusted ?

giant steps
08/1/2013
07:59
30k buy pre market, is Lisa buying more ?
34simon
08/1/2013
01:46
That is interesting. Lisa buying 250k is far more interesting than PC buying 200k.

The only problem is that MUBL has been smoke and mirrors for so long that it is impossible to know whether it is a genuine buy or whether she has been put up to it.

However it does mean that no meaningful news can come out for a while as no buyout, takeover, taking private, fund raising etc is currently being discussed.

fft
07/1/2013
16:55
I might have to unfilter CR to see his negative view on a FD buying such a reasonable % of the company.
34simon
07/1/2013
16:48
Ah, so that's who's been buying them up!

Very interesting..........

Good old Lisa.

philjeans
07/1/2013
14:39
Hello Gravy
knowing
07/1/2013
14:37
Now going up and up on no trades, makes you wonder if there is some news behind this ?
34simon
07/1/2013
13:53
3 x 50k buys and 2 of them at a premium, somebody sees value, probably cr buying while deramping here :-))
34simon
02/1/2013
14:07
He's HateTrader, I told you, read all his other posts, watching L2 all th etime on penny rubbis, rucking with TopInfo - he must think other traders daft not to know who he is.

CR

cockneyrebel
02/1/2013
10:35
CurvedAir

Incorrect, not connected to the board at all.

34simon
02/1/2013
10:33
34 Simon. You are a friend of the CEO? Are you sure about that. It will all end in tears and the remaining cash will be spent on luxury items( remember the Olympic Tickets) or perhaps you were a guest at this event if you are a friend.

Davidosh thoughts of 28 Dec are spot on!

As long as MBL keeps the CEO's Aston Martin and selection of high end 4x4's on the road this business will remain milked to the end.

curvedair
29/12/2012
21:45
Back to MUBL
There is no part of this group that makes any sense at all. Every division loses money, even the new bird seed nonsense.
Harping back to the loss of Morrisons does not wash, that is ancient history. They kitchen sinked everything last year, now suddenly all the remaining operations are also failing.
Cash will run out next year or sooner, then the party will be over.
Note the increase in expenses. £1 to penny that the directors salaries have gone back up..
If you hold stock, sell it while you can..

timesmoney
29/12/2012
19:25
Triple digit percentages are all well and good hatetrader but you can't make serious money in small cap peny shares without taking unacceptable risk. Look at Freddy in CARE - he's punted £500K or more, taken a near 30% stake and blwn the lot nearly.

Why not gear up in a CFD or spreadbet on a larger cap stock? DXNS is up 100% in 6 months - you can gear up on spreadbet in there and take a decent stake - 100% over 6 months is 100sss% on the capital outlay in a spreadbet. A 20% margin spread bet on DXNS of say £10k would have been like buying £50K worth of shares then. They would now be worth £100K - that's a £90K profit. Even on a tenth of that scale with just £1k bet you make £9k and just risk £1K. Far greater reward to risk ratio and much easier to make serious dosh.

Cue Hatetrader getting all flappy and going on about arrogance etc but just pointing out the bleedin' obvious that you spend all your time trying to find a load of little rampable penny shares and igngore the fact that 200% of very little is still not a lot and you haven't factored in the ones that go wrong where you give away 30-50% on the thumping spread.

Advance in your trading, you've been penny skimming for 10 years to my knowledge and you were throwing the towel in last year - not the act of a guy that does well at this imo.

CR

cockneyrebel
29/12/2012
19:19
Aye, and well done to you, but in this case I wouldn't be too confident of cash balances whilst they are under the control of the CEO who also happens to be the majority shareholder. The current cash balances pale into insignificance compared to the cash which the current management p1ssed up the wall in strange transactions with their friends and acquaintances and there's nothing to say that can't happen to the rest. Good luck, but my point remains that this is no longer a company which is worthy of a public quote.
jeffian
29/12/2012
19:08
A few bob eh jeffian, it was more than a few bob and it made 200% +, you lot keep banging on about the company but all that matters to me is buying low and selling high, half the battle is making money out of bad stocks, I made over 800% on a penny stock in 2 months that announced a loss of 8 million, there will probably be more chances to make great profits with some good timing in Mubl especially when the market cap remains substantially lower than their cash balances.
34simon
29/12/2012
13:33
The obvious thing to do when they lost the MRW contract was to sell everything and distribute the cash. It would be interesting to know why they didn't do that.

I am afraid it is on the way to zero and this is management that has failed on several levels.

The one good thing is that the loss is mitigated by offsetting CGT elsewhere.

kimboy2
29/12/2012
11:57
Well I'm one of the sado-masochists that held this all the way down and took my loss at the bottom (3-oddp, I think) as I needed to use the Capital Loss, but I have to agree with davidosh and Kimboy, there really is no case for this to remain as a public company. I held on for so long as I assumed TA would take it private - as he should. One investing maxim which I always find useful - whether a share you hold is high or low - is to keep asking yourself the question "Would I buy this today at this price?" If MBL was coming to the market today with a Prospectus describing a mish-mash of small, and not obviously complementary businesses (a specialist music publisher, a declining music/entertainment wholesaler, a music retailer with an 'online' name but which trades out of bricks-and-mortar premises, and a bird-food retailer), making losses from small, and declining, revenues, would you buy it? Punters like 34Simon may make a few bob bottom-fishing, and good luck to them, but no serious investor is going to look at this and there is no need for it to remain in the glare of public scrutiny with all the associated costs it can ill afford. TA should take it back at NAV.
jeffian
Chat Pages: 211  210  209  208  207  206  205  204  203  202  201  200  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock