|Market Tech Holdings
||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
|Real Estate Investment & Services
Market Tech Share Discussion Threads
Showing 301 to 320 of 325 messages
|Some huge buys on this in the last couple of days. Does someone know something?|
|For further future discussion, anyone interested in these either long or short, continue over at new thread started, 23/02/2017 by an avatar named 'haroldthegreat', with news, fundamentals, charts etc.
|well done Harold.|
|I have set up this thread at least there is a chart! Did not realise how easy it is to do.|
|22/02/2017 Heiken ashi, Ichimoku Kinko Hyo and Renko trend...|
|Where did he get in tho? That looks like a break on the daily - weekly yet to confirm
free stock charts from uk.advfn.com|
|Naked trader is out apparently. Took a loss on this.|
|I must say at this point that I was very surprised to see Naked Trader take up a position in this. I am waiting to be proved wrong and when I saw Robbie's purchase I was thinking I had missed something. Following Naked traders rules for investing .it seems they dont fit the criteria he has laid down. Not only that I would say their Camden venture has a lot of dark holes. IMHO|
|It's about time this stock started to move|
|Not bad it seems to have kept up momentum.....
|HEY we have continued up!
It certainly feels more positive.|
|GOOD IDEA HAROLD I am not the best at getting the charts to work though so happy for somebody else to take the lead?|
|why not start a new thread that shows the share price and any news eg rns. would make life much easier to have all the information in one place.|
|Was surprised at the digital revenue...
And in the bowels of yesterdays results, this caught my eye
"We are conscious, however, that as this division becomes more material to the performance of the Group, we need to consider the best strategy to accelerate its growth and maximise shareholder value."
|The market seem to like the results....8-)|
|Do you mean PRSM?
At a cursory glance, it seems like a load of BS.
They give no details at all about their technology; just wishy-washy management talk.
Nothing built with Microsoft .Net and SQL Server is going to be world-changing, which is basically what they are claiming.
My guess, and the CTO hints at it in his video, is that it is just an "arena" in which bespoke scripts, APIs etc get run, the only benefits accruing being logging, auditing, scheduling etc. The customer will either have to write the scripts themselves still or pay PRSM and its partners exorbitant fees to do so.
TCO imo would be very high for anybody but very large organisations with large teams of developers. They might get some value out of such a facility. The likes of Capita, CapGem, Logica would love such a "harness". And thus you have the extent of their customer base.
But it won't scale up imo to anything other than these mega organisations and it is basically simple software to write, ie copy. I don't think they have any AI/NN etc algorithms, otherwise they would surely mention them, as they would be big value-adders in such an environment. This is despite Dr. Kingdon having a background in AI!. They even mention in the prospectus that they are vulnerable to any competitors coming along with a solution based on AI!!!
The main negative, though, imo is that they are rowing against the tide of IT management towards cloud-based platforms managed by the platform providers and away from on-premise self-managed systems.
It would have been a good idea 25 years ago.
They have been going at this since 2001 and still only have revenue of circa £6m. That probably speaks volumes. With the caveat that they put on quite a "surge" in licence sales in the last 2 years, boosting total revenue from £3m (after 12 years!) to £6m. Experience tells me that this is probably contrived in some way for the IPO. It is basically a pay-the-wages IT company and the chaps who founded it have very luckily found themselves an exit door, thanks to some slick PR.
I can see, however, that non-IT PIs/analysts may well get caught up in the hype, so it may well have a trajectory similar to say WAND. However, the WAND technology is basically very, very hot and so WAND will eventually come good.
It might be worth investing in if valued at say £10m, but if that happens the market will have latched onto what it really does and it will stay valued at <= £10m. They should be able to do break-even on an ongoing basis unless management goes crazy thinking they need to do something to justify the hype, ie employ a load of developers to develop stuff that won't sell.|
|PERHAPS YOU HAVE HAD A GOOD INFLUENCE oops on us bakunin!
have you looked at PRISM.... my latest interest?