We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management Resource Solutions Plc | LSE:MRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8BL4R23 | ORD EUR0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.30 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
31/10/2018 23:16 | I sometimes buy here on a T20 and settle up later in the month I dunno, these long term investors.... | sm0ggyg | |
31/10/2018 16:20 | 6.32-6.45p is the real spread As normal the mm's quote is nowhere near the online one | dave4545 | |
31/10/2018 16:17 | I sometimes buy here on a T20 and settle up later in the month but I was unable to buy even 10k shares yesterday at the offer price,there was no on-line quote. I could have put an 'at best' order in but I have done that before and the deal wasn't done until after the MMs had raised the price,so I won't do that again. It seems that the MMs are not always happy to sell PIs shares at the offer price when demand is high. This often happens with shares that are lightly traded and MMs don't want to be exposed to risk but the good flip side is when buyers want in at any price then the share price is likely to rise fast. Some time before the December results I expect MRS to rally big time. | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 12:36 | There's something very stinky and fishy about this share. On the surface,it looks cheap, but what lies beneath? | sm0ggyg | |
31/10/2018 11:26 | It's 6.5p to buy now anyway They were never going to keep that spread when online was lower. | dave4545 | |
31/10/2018 11:02 | 6.5-7.0 yet can buy at 6.52..... | lufc5 | |
31/10/2018 11:00 | We'll have smoke and mirrors for a good while yet. Hope it settles down in new year. | lufc5 | |
31/10/2018 10:57 | If that 619k trade is a buy, then that is 1.7m + buys today. Strangely the bid has risen but I can't even get a quote to sell 5k at 6.5p. I still think a bigger sell being worked...... | troutisout | |
31/10/2018 10:25 | If there is not a bigger trade say 1 million at 6.2p later then that trade is a sale. LUFC Since when did L2 give the correct detail on a trade buy/sell wise, it's got no idea about worked trades. I'm 99% on this, worked cleared move on | dave4545 | |
31/10/2018 10:16 | Dave, Not sure it is a sell or a buy, it is delayed by an hour so was after the earlier 100k and 50k buying spree, but what a good price to sell considering previous sells were in the 6.15p area. The other thing that tends to sway me is the amount, as you say an odd number in shares, but looks like someone has put in £39k as the cash amount, I find people do that more often on buys..... So could well be a sell or a buy (with an even larger sell to come), the buys are still going through, although the spread shows them as sells now..... | troutisout | |
31/10/2018 10:11 | 09:50:22 6.6000 44,000 O 6.3000 7.0000 Sell 1,574,023 92,292 09:41:46 6.5000 50,000 O 6.1000 6.5000 Buy////// The 6.60p 'sell' is actually a buy and the reason for the rise of the offer price. | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 10:06 | I think Dave is correct about the 619k trade but I am not so sure it was a Bachmann sell as it could be linked to the recent RNS holdings seller,Morffew or URU even. Anyway it is out of the way and could have been the last of the holding. You often see a big odd number sell when a big seller finishes but who knows? | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 10:05 | I disagree. My L2 shows it as a buy... | lufc5 | |
31/10/2018 09:57 | That 619k is a sale Explains why mm's sat and did not move. At least it's out of the way, looks too random a number to be morefew or bachmann which is a shame | dave4545 | |
31/10/2018 09:50 | It looks as if they have just woken up. | biggest bill | |
31/10/2018 09:49 | Large delayed buy there.... | lufc5 | |
31/10/2018 09:35 | Perhaps they are asleep Any other stock with that buying and that premium buy would be up a good % but not good old Mrs, however if 2-3 million shares today were wiped off Bachmann I'd take that instead of a rise | dave4545 | |
31/10/2018 09:26 | I can only buy 10,000 shares at the moment but I can sell 250,000 without any problem. I see that there has been heavy buying this morning at this price. Perhaps the market makers are a bit short of stock? | biggest bill | |
31/10/2018 09:10 | Good entry price, smoky. | thehitman1 | |
31/10/2018 08:52 | Now ratified by the necessary 6 plus nations with Australias news today. The USA is not in it though,having pulled out earlier. | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 08:50 | Trans-Pacific Partnership From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search This article is about the defunct proposed trade agreement. For its 11 nation successor, see Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. It has been suggested that Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since January 2018. Unbalanced scales.svg The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Leaders of TPP member states.jpg Leaders from 10 of the 12 prospective member states at a TPP summit in 2010 Type Trade agreement Drafted 5 October 2015; 3 years ago[1][2][3] Signed 4 February 2016; 2 years ago Location Auckland, New Zealand Effective Not in force Condition Ratification by all original signatories, or (2 years after signature) ratification by at least 6 states corresponding to 85% of GDP of original signatories[4] Original signatories 12 Australia Brunei Canada Chile Japan Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Peru Singapore United States (Withdrawn)[5] Vietnam Ratifiers 2 Japan New Zealand Depositary New Zealand Languages English (prevailing in the case of conflict or divergence), Spanish, Vietnamese, Japanese, French Trans-Pacific Partnership at Wikisource The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a defunct proposed trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, and United States signed on 4 February 2016, which was not ratified as required and did not take effect. After the United States withdrew its signature,[6] the agreement could not enter into force. The remaining nations negotiated a new trade agreement called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which incorporates most of the provisions of the TPP. The TPP began as an expansion of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP or P4) signed by Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore in 2005. Beginning in 2008, additional countries joined the discussion for a broader agreement: Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Vietnam, bringing the negotiating countries to twelve. In January 2017, the United States withdrew from the agreement.[5][7] The other 11 TPP countries agreed in May 2017 to revive it[8][9] and reached agreement in January 2018. In March 2018, the 11 countries signed the revised version of the agreement, called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.[10] The original TPP contained measures to lower both non-tariff and tariff barriers to trade,[11] and establish an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism.[12][13] The U.S. International Trade Commission,[14] the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the World Bank and the Office of the Chief Economist at Global Affairs Canada found the final agreement would, if ratified, lead to net positive economic outcomes for all signatories, while an analysis using an alternative methodology by two Tufts University economists found the agreement would adversely affect the signatories.[Note 1] Many observers have argued the trade deal would have served a geopolitical purpose, namely to reduce the signatories' dependence on Chinese trade and bring the signatories closer to the United States | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 08:44 | Australia signs up to the TPP deal (Trans-Pacific Partnership),which will now commence at the end of this year. This is a $200bn trade deal and includes New Zealand,Japan,Chile, | smoggyg | |
31/10/2018 08:21 | There are always some that sell at the bottom dave. This is a time to buy or hold, as results are out in December and we know that they will be good. | smoggyg |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions