We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leisure&Gaming | LSE:LNG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B071S784 | ORD 5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 5.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/10/2010 20:16 | it was schadenfreude on these bulletin boards which stopped King Poster LDMachin getting shafted in the same way as those brainwashed Fools on the other site question everything and believe nothing... unfortunately many suckers on these boards go broke (some more than once) before they finally see the light | burgerbarwomen | |
05/10/2010 20:07 | appalling grammar above. sorry. | nickymaine | |
05/10/2010 20:06 | I do agree with whichever Burgerbarwoman with whom I'm corresponding right now about an element of smoke and mirrors in the past for sure, and to a despicable level. The conservative take on bets over the World Cup however were damage limitation - such fortunes to be won and lost and minimal operating cash to lose at that stage. Things have improved, as they do in this game, recently. Let's wait and see, yes? If LNG goes under, it won't be for lack of trying behind the scenes, and schadenfreude on the bulletin boards helps no-one. I'll try not to rise to the next bait. Regards to all. | nickymaine | |
05/10/2010 19:56 | As said above Smoke and mirrors to the end Whatever that will be ? | saturdaygirl | |
05/10/2010 19:53 | nickymaine I am nothing to do with any poster here or the fool group, just an individual who nearly invested, hence my interest. Not all shareholders are in the Fool group or Directors, so the lack of an RNS fully clarifying what happens next in the event of certain financial scenarios I find bizarre. One of the Fool Group even posted at one stage recently that it might be good if LNG were not doing well. I found that very strange logic indeed - perhaps he did not (or chose not to) fully understand the potential finality of the situation? | microscope | |
05/10/2010 19:48 | nickymaine according to Mr Creed, Betshop were in financial stress during the World Cup (excellent for bookies) resulting in the group having to lay off bets (profitable ones) which impacted on Q2 performance so how are they able to operate in a normal manner now? have Betshop had a new cash injection? if Betshop took the bets for the domestic season then why not the World Cup? you see nicky.... it's all spin and bull... smoke and mirrors what a load of codswallop to the bitter end. | burgerbarwomen | |
05/10/2010 19:39 | no, not on trees, Burgerbarwoman, but Betshop have would had some good results this last couple of weeks. Should you have been following. I've realised my mistake ... you are plural, a group (yup, I'm such a newbie) but it does explain the fact that one of you posts astute, informed and erudite comment, and well, frankly, the other/rest of you, don't. | nickymaine | |
05/10/2010 19:18 | agreed we could/should get the administration news tomorrow... maybe an after the close RNS? if LNG continue to trade until the 12th, then I demand to know where that extra 60k in cash has come from..... I mean it don't grow on trees you know! | burgerbarwomen | |
05/10/2010 14:49 | I hope the Fools won't find themselves stuffed, along the lines of; Last meeting - 'we will try to give you till the twelfth, despite what we said in the rns....' And on the 7th say, 'nope sorry the last week or two no good, means we can't extend it after all;' and the administration goes ahead. i.e. I hope the extension 'promise' was absolutely watertight. | microscope | |
05/10/2010 14:28 | my mate down the dog & duck reckons that the Fools have applied for lottery funding is this true? | burgerbarwomen | |
05/10/2010 08:32 | If you're talking about David's post, he DID mention LNG lol | hiq | |
05/10/2010 08:25 | Wouldnt mind burgers but there was a post yesterday from a prominent fool highliting just how well all the presenting companys at the fools bash (the mellow) had done since appearing for them. How come this one wasnt listed or is it just the good ones that are highlited and the bad ones shoved under the carpet. Talk about lemmings. | trendfloor | |
05/10/2010 08:16 | desperate times for the Fools now one week left until the egm the Fools must be working night and day to secure a deal | burgerbarwomen | |
04/10/2010 16:26 | LNG have roughly 4m admin costs each year divide by 365 and multiply by 6 days and that's an extra £65000 that's appeared from nowhere.... apparently does anyone care? | burgerbarwomen | |
04/10/2010 16:19 | but they only have sufficient capital to trade until 6th 0ct.. so where will the extra money come from? all smoke and mirrors once more... | burgerbarwomen | |
04/10/2010 16:10 | according to LNG's most recent RNS, the Adjournment occurred to allow the SPA to actually be 'concluded'. Given that the SPA was not in a suitable condition to be signed, the above has been superceded by events. In my humble opinion only and I'm no expert. | nickymaine | |
04/10/2010 15:24 | "In the event that the Proposals are not approved by Shareholders, the Company will have insufficient working capital to allow it to continue to trade. Accordingly, the Board have been advised that without the proceeds of the Disposal the Company will need to cease trading by no later than 6 October 2010 and they would expect to appoint administrators. In the event that the Disposal does not result in a Sale and Purchase Agreement being signed, notwithstanding the approval of Shareholders, the Company will in that situation also have insufficient working capital to allow it to continue to trade and would expect to appoint administrators." Crikey your right only 1 more day left in the life of LNG according to their recent RNS. | rkhl | |
04/10/2010 09:44 | about 48 hours until LNG go into administration LNG said so! | burgerbarwomen | |
03/10/2010 04:16 | i have no idea why jmaccer thinks that 4p is going to be returned to the shareholders. only 1p is guaranteed to go to lng plc, and that will be invested. plc costs etc will eat into that, and then there will be tax as the money is returned... aim investment companies tend to trade at a large discount to alleged valuations, so you may be able to sell in the market for 1/3 to 1/2p. the earn out is smoke and mirrors. the earn out bands are so close together that it would not be difficult to miss them.... | fft | |
02/10/2010 21:01 | jmaccer, as you have been at pains to point out, you have no shareholding. What really is your interest here? | nickymaine | |
02/10/2010 20:40 | Cliff wasn't lying, he was hoodwinked. | hiq | |
02/10/2010 20:23 | Is anyone going to report Cliff D'Arcy to the FSA for all his lies? | conlon2 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions