We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnston Press | LSE:JPR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BRK8Y334 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.745 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/9/2016 15:14 | yes lots of buying around 15-17p and selling at 18-19p levels ... Heading in the right direction though ... would like to see another RNS holdings increase to confirm stock being accumulated | mister md | |
22/9/2016 15:10 | Hi I am just watching it all kicking off on Hargreaves actually post on the LSE board but don't think anyone is watching today think the next fifteen minutes will be quite exciting cant decide whether to hold and hope this is not a false dawn or take a little profit for a change Good luck to you, you are not alone. | silvergreyhead | |
22/9/2016 15:06 | is there anybody out there ? :-) | mister md | |
22/9/2016 09:38 | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS Institutional Interests (the Company has been notified of the following holdings (to the nearest notified percentage)) Orbis Investment Management Ltd 13.39% Ananda Krishnan Tatparanandam / PanOcean Management Ltd 10.63% River and Mercantile Asset Management LLP 9.52% Artemis Investment Management LLP 6.43% Sir Raymond Stanley Tindle 6.00% Majedie Asset Management Limited 5.84% Crystal Amber Fund Limited 5.42% GLG Partners LP 4.87% Last Updated 19.09.2016 | mister md | |
22/9/2016 07:47 | being held back well - hopefully not for long | mister md | |
22/9/2016 06:02 | I will be surprised if CA do not acquire at least 10 percent - level needed to force an EGM. Perhaps more depends on where they see the upside and exit point forcing value. MR X - 70 pence take out sounds too cheap in the sense of Broker Targets that are 160 to 200 at the top end but realistic in that CA will want a decent return on their investment bearing in mind other Institutions are still massively underwater - they are going to be far from impressed with the performance under AH's tenure - it takes something like this for some value to be realised for all Stakeholders. MM seemed to be following TNI fall yesterday as an excuse to take this down as buying 17.5 to 18 pence not letting it go up. | mattab | |
21/9/2016 20:43 | took an interest here as I follow crystal amber investments | laserdisc | |
21/9/2016 12:45 | must be approaching Crystal top-up territory again ... | mister md | |
21/9/2016 10:55 | In my own JP area operating costs will be difficult to reduce. They now operate without offices. | rabbrooks | |
21/9/2016 09:35 | Dazzaa Hopefully those saggy bottom drawers will be worth opening again in the months/years ahead. Those who stumped up the last placing can't be feeling too happy with management and I doubt whether another palacing would be welcomed, so it's a discounted bond buy back that looks like the way ahead. Cutting some operating costs looks warranted too. At least now there is some potential action finally stirring and the market is reacting to a positive outcome from that. | nick rubens | |
21/9/2016 09:20 | .. now showing (as a sell) - ;) | mister md | |
21/9/2016 08:41 | I have to admit I am very impressed with what they have done with the i paper and also integrating it. If anyone looks at AH twitters feed you will see some good stuff fromm its editor etc. The site is also very nice. | mrx9000 | |
21/9/2016 08:33 | my 50k buy at 17p from earlier still not showing, will probably show up as a sell later on when the bid is 17p, sneaky stuff ;) | mister md | |
21/9/2016 08:25 | I would say that another interested party/company would look at the ebitda and work out a price from that as well as factoring in the debt. Gannett have been buying companies and paying around a 3.5 times ebitda figure and these companies had a fair amount of debt. In JPs case 1.5 ebitda is around the very conservative 75 level. 100 being a conservative x 2. At a guess it would be at least 75. Forget about the PE figure in my view. 10 is not right at that amount and it is misleading imo. | mrx9000 | |
21/9/2016 08:18 | What valuation do you think CA put on JPR if they either broke it up or sold it as a whole?I suppose this will determine what they will pay as they increase their stake. JPR is running at a decent operating profit. If the right deal is done on the discounting the bonds. The company could easily have a valuation at a PE of 10 near £100m (approx £1 per share), not forgetting house broker is a bit more optimistic at £1.60!!It's all dependant on the discount on the debt buy back. CA must have a a better idea than we do as to the discount being offered but if CA are a buyer, so am I. Priced to fail at these levels but you have successful activist fund managers building their stake. It's an easy buy while they are. | phil1969 | |
21/9/2016 08:05 | Yes, getting interesting now. I assume Crystal Ambers plan is to accumulate a lot more. I see them accumulating 10% at least. If my memory serves me right they managed to accumulate 18% of thorntons before takeover. | mrx9000 | |
21/9/2016 07:35 | 17.84p paid for a mere 9000 shares ... could get interesting here very soon | mister md | |
21/9/2016 07:21 | No RNS yet but we'll be knocking on the door of 20p when it comes........ | philjeans | |
20/9/2016 18:42 | NR they are definitely saggy. | dazzaa | |
20/9/2016 16:16 | Game on if AC has been adding again. RNS? | philjeans | |
20/9/2016 14:14 | Alot of JPR shareholders with heavy bottom drawers might eventually feel like opening them again. | nick rubens | |
20/9/2016 13:20 | Whats the story with this falling so low on 245m turnover? | isaready | |
20/9/2016 13:10 | the nice 15p AT buys have returned ... Crystal style ? | mister md | |
20/9/2016 12:40 | Long standing JPR shareholders deserve better than this miniscule mkt cap. The company management need to act asap. STY shareholders got the right deal on their debt. Lets see JPR do the same. | nick rubens |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions