ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

MNZS Menzies(john) Plc

607.00
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Menzies(john) Plc LSE:MNZS London Ordinary Share GB0005790059 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 607.00 607.00 608.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Menzies(john) Share Discussion Threads

Showing 676 to 699 of 2900 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  22  21  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/5/2016
09:59
AGM coming up 20 May...probably a non-event...or...
buffettjnr
18/4/2016
16:19
BNY Mellon disclosing >5% as of 14th March, correcting a previous notification that doesn't appear to have been published.
1gw
18/4/2016
13:39
Intriguing. You think the activists would want to install their own CFO for a split? Is that gut feel or has PB put something on record which would make it difficult for her to stay?

I thought a bigger job just based on market caps. Mnzs c. £300m vs Spt c. £500m. Spt has much lower revenues though and I don't know about the complexities of the moving parts from a CFO perspective.

1gw
18/4/2016
13:28
It's not a bigger job. She knows she won't be around 2 minutes when the activists take over.
buffettjnr
18/4/2016
13:19
Not sure - I would have thought the prospect of overseeing a demerger or IPO would be quite attractive to a CFO. So if she thought the activists would get their way in the near-term, she might want to see through the split. But it could be that the working environment has become difficult due to pro-split and anti-split camps inside the company. Or it could be a protest against something that contributed to the CEO leaving. Or it could just be that she is ambitious and saw a chance to move to a bigger job.
1gw
18/4/2016
12:01
Even Paula Bell sees the writing on the wall...activists have won this one. I'm buying more...
buffettjnr
08/4/2016
10:59
Please do...but just a few...at GBP8 you might be kicking yourself.
buffettjnr
08/4/2016
10:22
Nice to see it back above £5 again. Do I need to sell a few more to keep the rally going?
1gw
05/4/2016
13:27
Can't find the annual report yet, but news on shareholdings all the same.

Good to see Kabouter still acquiring given their supposed support for Lakestreet's split idea.

1gw
04/4/2016
16:25
I'm not aware of an analyst presentation.
buffettjnr
04/4/2016
14:21
Annual Report due tomorrow. Might be something of interest, if only the latest shareholdings position.

There's still no webcast of the full-year results on the site (although the presentation slides are there). Did they not have an analyst presentation in the end?

1gw
02/4/2016
19:20
Alaska Air Nearing Deal to Acquire Virgin America...good news for MNZS peutetre
buffettjnr
30/3/2016
09:47
...seems still to be working.
1gw
18/3/2016
16:31
I wouldn't complain if it did...
1gw
18/3/2016
15:15
Excellent. I hope it works as well as the last time you sold some :-)
buffettjnr
18/3/2016
14:40
I've taken a few more off the table at 4.67, locking in some profit from purchases earlier this year.
1gw
11/3/2016
17:12
What is more interesting is who the seller is...as they will be regretting their decision...
buffettjnr
11/3/2016
16:35
That's a lot of volume gone through today. TR-1 to come?
1gw
08/3/2016
18:22
Spin-offs

And on that theme, I listened to David Kostin, the Chief US equity strategist for Goldman Sachs, speaking on CNBC earlier today. He was pushing the idea that there has been a trend recently of companies creating greater returns for their shareholders by spinning off subsidiaries. He thought this trend would continue and said that the chances were good of a dramatic increase in return to shareholders (in terms of an excess return in the spinco vs the parent) if the company being spun off had the following characteristics:
1. A lower p/e multiple than the parent;
2. A lower expected return than the parent (in respect of earnings growth);
3. Operates in a different industry from the parent.

It seems to me a spin off by John Menzies of the distribution business (i.e. retaining the aviation business) would fit these criteria, but the (perhaps) more obvious spin-off of the aviation business would not. I suppose practically for the John Menzies shareholders it doesn't really matter which business is spun off and which is retained so long as they get the chance to participate in both, but thought that it was an interesting perspective, and one I hope Lakestreet will not be shy of bringing to the board's attention.

I see in the write-up of the CNBC segment, GS appear to advocate going long the spinco and short the parent, so something to watch for if we do get there.

1gw
08/3/2016
12:04
On the unlocking value piece, interesting to compare the TU statement with the results statement:

13th January:
"The Board of John Menzies plc will continue to review its strategic and organisational options to enhance shareholder value"

8th March:
"The Board is confident that we have strategies available to us in both of our operating divisions capable of delivering growth. We continue to evaluate the optimum structure for the Group to potentially further enhance shareholder value."

It may be over-interpreting, but I could read the 8th March statement as saying that they've essentially finished the review of strategic options and are happy with what's in place. So what remains from the 13th Jan statement is the "organisational options to enhance shareholder value", and here they are now focused on "optimum structure for the Group".

From the "activist" standpoint I could be optimistic and think that they are now actively considering a split/demerger given that they think both divisions have growth strategies available to them. The reference to "further enhance shareholder value" in the context of "structure for the Group" to me suggests they are looking at more than just whether they have 2 divisions reporting to a single CEO, or two divisions each reporting directly to the board.

1gw
08/3/2016
11:04
I like your summary 1gw. I was encouraged to see that management commentary continues to suggest a strategic move to unlock value. And the dividend is welcome. I don't like the continuing reliance on 2H earnings, as it entices management to bring forward future earnings to match numbers.
buffettjnr
08/3/2016
10:50
Very muted reaction to the results - with little price movement and not much volume so far.

The results strike me as mildly encouraging. The main positives for me are:
o Distribution returns to (underlying) profit growth (£25.1m 2015 vs £24.0m 2014).
o Aviation back to more than 50% of underlying op profit in 2H (£13.7m vs £12.9m for Distribution) and not far off 50% for the year (£23.1m vs £25.1m)
o Dividend growth resumed (albeit from lower base). 16.8p for the year not bad for a growth business!
o Signs that things are set up fairly well going forward. Network rationalisation in distribution completed. Problems at Gatwick now resolved. Curiously circumspect statement on the potential for growth from both divisions, but better than nothing "The Board is confident that we have strategies available to us in both of our operating divisions capable of delivering growth." Rather suggests the Board isn't overly confident on strategy implementation...

Can't see any major negatives, although I find the continuing large gap between "basic" and "underlying" earnings unhelpful. Given the average gap in eps between the 2 measures has been nearly 20p over the last 7 years, perhaps the board could conclude that some of the costs should be transferred into the "underlying" category.

1gw
07/3/2016
11:03
I think we need to differentiate between "lazy" institutional investors and "activist" institutional investors. In my experience, the U.K. has many who fall into the former category. Menzies shareholder base is now very activist-heavy. Which can only be good news for us.
buffettjnr
07/3/2016
10:46
Many thanks, Buffettjnr. Personal experience makes me very wary of companies without significant institutional involvement - the directors can run them as personal fiefdoms.

However, I took the Schroder sale into account in my 28-31% figure, so I don't think there's any call for panic. Will see what tomorrow brings.

grahamite2
Chat Pages: Latest  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  22  21  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock