JJB Sports Share Discussion Threads

[sir rational] 21/9/2012 14:58

Charlie Chan dumping the lot methinks

[bingowing] 21/9/2012 14:13

really tim?

I've been buying quite a few.

[hairyback2] 21/9/2012 14:05

zeus,im with you mate,LOL
HB

[sir rational] 21/9/2012 14:04

Charlie Chan will start selling his 20 million shares in a minute

[granitetim] 21/9/2012 13:58

You know and I know that's unlikely ever ;)
Bingowang!!

[granitetim] 21/9/2012 13:52

Lambs to the slaughter..
LoL

[jimrclark] 21/9/2012 13:50

Just got quoted 0.56p to buy!!!

[nico9] 21/9/2012 13:44

must be another 45k for you by now Zeus

[zeuseq] 21/9/2012 13:43

Yeah baby yeah!

[pembury] 21/9/2012 13:33

2.1m bought at just under .47p

[quidzinn] 21/9/2012 13:14

0.4035 now -MM's are after stock.

Q

[quidzinn] 21/9/2012 13:07

oops yes :)

Q

[vikramarahaji] 21/9/2012 13:05

Q

Didn't you mean 0.402p?

[quidzinn] 21/9/2012 13:02

No wishing involved.

I'm still holding 2 million.

Q

[quidzinn] 21/9/2012 12:57

Could sell 1,000,000 online @ 4.02p



Q

[bingowing] 21/9/2012 12:55

Why would Nike and Adidas want JJb to survive?


firstly SPD devalue their brands by selling stock too cheaply.

Also you have to remember The brands have many different lines that they like to sell.

Different shops can have different lines.

So only having SPD selling would obviously be detrimental too The big brands.

The talk of internet sales.

Don't forget recently Adidas said that they we're going to be cutting back on what they let people sell online, That is they are a looking to limit what is sold online via various outlets.


Its been said that fatty likes to leak bad news about things he wants to buy so as to drive the price down or scare off other suitors.

It turns out the HMRC news was a non news event in reality.

This is looking like the mkt are pricing something other than a pre pack iMO

Thats not to say this is not risky, its massively risky still.

Gl all holders.

[cathdrew2] 21/9/2012 12:48

No I guess fat boys are more your cup of tea

[granitetim] 21/9/2012 12:47

Aye up Fat Cath.. They got wi-fi in the bookies now?
Do you know that you have an obsession with me?
I don't like Fat Birds

[cathdrew2] 21/9/2012 12:44

ZeusEq shush you'll upset Tiny Tim if you're making money here

[vic_frost] 21/9/2012 12:43

Seems to me this is ticking up on little volume compared to previous spikes !!

[zeuseq] 21/9/2012 12:42

Woo hoo, up she goes.

[jimrclark] 21/9/2012 10:25

That's a very unusual stake, don't you think. I would have thought that philanthropist's are usually more risk averse, safeguarding their cash (however small) so that they can continue supporting good causes.

Pre-pack is described as controversial and not everyone agrees with that as a good solution. There are too many losers in a pre-pack for my liking. I wonder if they have a major objection to the pre-pack approach, the impact on jobs and, perhaps, they are attempting to build a stake to influence the way forward.

Either that or they know someone close to the deal.