We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jarvis | LSE:JRVS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0DLKZ47 | ORD 5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.40 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/4/2010 11:25 | Just heard a commotion outside....looked out the window, a protest with an RMT banner aimed at the Network Rail building over the street...TV camera there so will probably make at least the local news.. No doubt Gordon Brown won't want it to be an election issue of any kind.. | jazza | |
14/4/2010 08:54 | Exactly. I was assuming Charles Bronson would be playing you. | yuka | |
14/4/2010 08:50 | yuka Not as funny as you may think, dw was about a man aggrieved killing people who have done wrongs, I bet the nwr and government transport people along with the pm would not be feeling comfortable with that thought. regards active | srpactive | |
14/4/2010 08:00 | Perhaps Michael Winner and Charles Bronson could be persuaded to make something under the name Deathwish 4. | yuka | |
14/4/2010 07:19 | stepin 1 I have been saying how wrong it has been for ages and ages, with Gartmore involved, and also the IC adamantly not covering Jarvis whatsoever, I feel the ( Government ) have pulled jarvis in to nationalise their workload. I read yesterday even the unions say it stinks and they state especially with jarvis winning recent contracts and SEVERAL lucrative contracts in the pipeline. The government have nationalise jarvis workload and also wiped out our tax losses of £180m. This is disgusting and a film needs to be made to inform the country of this disgraceful behaviour, time to find a conservative script writer if the conservatives get in and then get funding and approach itv. If this does not get resolved corectly for workers and shareholders. dyor regards | srpactive | |
13/4/2010 23:54 | ... and another successful transfer of wealth from the many to a select few takes place as planned. We can't have those rich select few not getting any richer, even in a recession, don't you know... what, what. What will it take to make the peasants revolt... taking away X-Factor? | ldmachin | |
13/4/2010 18:17 | Calamity and Ianio5691 I and many others have signed in with our real names I am John Cleary but I dont think you would be excluded if you just gave your initials , go and have a look see what you think. As Bulg. says we are f--ked so it is worth a try | belhus | |
13/4/2010 16:19 | brando you must have a few contacts in that game that you could notify every little may help, personally i doubt it will do any good but cant do any more harm by trying | bulgarianpropertydoteudotcom | |
13/4/2010 15:41 | I believe it is going to be a month before we see a definite outcome. Maybe the banks know that if the labour government get in again they will continue with the nationalisation of Britain whereas if the tories get in the banks know nationalisation will end for the time being. In one months time we will know the government. dyor regards active | srpactive | |
13/4/2010 15:08 | for goodness sake I am sure a bank would support a business making a profit. | srpactive | |
13/4/2010 14:04 | Srpactive.. it is .. but cannot run without cash. we dont have cash hence its bust.. that is why HBOS and Barclays have taken control of it. they are not our bankers.. it was Burdale. but they have stepped in will pay staff etc and keep it running as a going concern. in return deloitte will be given 7 contracts to sell for £2m... do you see my point now... we could not run Jarvis FM without bank support... | stepin1 | |
13/4/2010 13:54 | stepin the pfi part is profitable. | srpactive | |
13/4/2010 13:53 | 'rwoolsey@deloitte.c Dear Sir, I am (or at least was) a shareholder in Jarvis PLC. Since your recent involvement and subsequent breakup of the company, I am still baffled as to why, in his last update to the market, Steven Norris said this: 17th Feb 2010 Overall, despite the very good performance of our Accommodation Services business, this has been a disappointing year for us as we have battled the very large reduction in rail volumes in 2009. However we have not stood idly by. The new management team has concentrated on improving our performance and efficiency whilst reducing our dependency on Network Rail. The emphasis we have placed on this is already bearing fruit. The Evergreen contract is a huge boost and we now have a strong bid pipeline with a significant proportion of work secured already for next year. Steven Norris Chairman, Jarvis plc A few months ago, KBC said this: Telegraph.co.uk - Nov 25, 2009 GB Group plc (GBG) - Alex Jarvis at KBC Peel Hunt Alex Jarvis, an analyst at GB Group's house broker, KBC Peel Hunt, said the business was suffering from a reduction in identity checks carried out by a major client, which "is frustrating and will have a material impact on pre tax profit forecasts, but the underlying direction of business development remains positive". This does not sound like a company about to go bust. Please can you explain why shareholders were not informed of the true financial status of the company and also why we were not given an opportunity to fund the debt ourselves, perhaps by way of a bond. How can anyone be expected to invest in the stock market when this type of blatantly misleading information is peddled? As far as I can see, for the price of an Olympic statue, or perhaps one year's wages of all the senior managers of Network Rail, Jarvis has been allowed to go under and hundreds of people made redundant. This, when there is so much modernisation work required on Britain's rail network and even talk of a new high speed rail infrastructure later on in this decade. This does make any sense to me. Common sense suggests that Jarvis should be kept going and this would be in everyone's best interests. Yours sincerely, | gsands | |
13/4/2010 13:23 | Can someone please give me the latest buy recommendation from KBC. I am writing a letter to the FSA. | gsands | |
12/4/2010 22:26 | srpactive they are only running bcus hbos and barclays are looking after the cashflow. otherwise this would close aswell. u keep forgetting why r we in administration. we cud not trade as going concern. we are bankrupt. it does not matter abt turnover no more as it not enuff to pay the bills. | stepin1 | |
12/4/2010 20:26 | Yes but we have the contracts and a business generating £50m and profitable still running, they will help Greece but not a solid british company with SKILLED workforce, christ talk about ready to swing for someone. active | srpactive | |
12/4/2010 18:04 | atleast they were given 10 days to raise some money Jan 23 2009 Infonic PLC suspended its shares pending clarification of its financial position. Jan 23 2009 Infonic PLC issues a second RNS with the following information:- As in previous periods and as disclosed in the interim results, the Company's financial results remain reliant on certain material contracts. Unfortunately some contracts, some of which are material, were not concluded before the year end and there is uncertainty as to the exact timing of their conclusion. Consequently results for the year ended 31 December 2008 will be significantly below market expectations. Additionally, the Company has some credit facilities which are expiring or payable during the first quarter of 2009. Infonic is seeking discussions with debt providers and shareholders to provide short term finance. Feb 3rd 2009 Infonic PLC appoints Robert Derek Smailes and Conrad Beighton both of Shipleys LLP, 10 Orange Street, London, WC2H 7DQ, as the administrators of the Company. | stepin1 | |
12/4/2010 16:55 | The board of Infonic plc called in the adminstrators the day after they formed an investment company registered in Jersey, and then ... you guessed it, they bought the company from the adminstrator. In one simple move they disposed of all the shareholders and became a private company. Take a look at the shareholders website - www.infonicplc.com We are now 1 year on and the FSA and the authorities are not interested. I don't want to sound too pessimistic about your "class action" group, but don't get your hopes up. Good luck, Prof. | lemsoft |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions