Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Irish Life&P.Gp LSE:IPM London Ordinary Share IE00B59NXW72 ORD EUR0.32
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00 € +0.00% 0.0285 € 0.00 € 0.00 € - - - 0.00 05:00:10
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Life Insurance 0.0 -157.0 -47.4 - 7.76

Irish Life&P.Gp Share Discussion Threads

Showing 4326 to 4347 of 4350 messages
Chat Pages: 174  173  172  171  170  169  168  167  166  165  164  163  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/11/2016
13:23
I wonder why no one else is writing here.I have spoken to a Lawyer of mine and asked him to go over the CJEU documents. He found that in contrary to what the Irish newspaper are writing, the judgments are in the shareholders favour. In its conclusion, it is noted that the CJEU did NOT actually endorsed the Irish Government actions on issuing shares below the nominal value and not offered pre-emption rights without the approval of general meeting. CJEU only supported the government action on increasing the shares without approval.And it is up to the Irish High Court to make the decision, when the case goes back to them, if the Shareholders minimum rights have been respected. Anyone has different view on this?
shareho1der
09/11/2016
22:28
The CJEU has answered the first question referred to it and we now know that the financial stability of EU is more important than Shareholders' rights .BUT the second question has NOT been answered and this will be referred back to the Irish High Court, who will investigate and decide if the ways the Bank recapitalisation were done breached the minimum rights of the Shareholders. No wonder the Irish Government is not yet claiming victory.
shareho1der
09/11/2016
19:28
Cudman.You should go back to reading the opinion of the advocate general Wahl. In sections 80-89,  Particularly, in the wording of Section 84. it seems the issue of the direction Order compatibility with European Law will be decided by the Irish High Court when the case goes back to them. Sections 91 and 92 give substance to this argument in shareholders favour. Especially when the Irish High Court makes decision on the proportionality of the direction order i.e. issuing shares below its nominal value. The Irish High Court will also be required to investigate the shareholders missing €453m which was not included in the recapitalising the Bank. This was explained in Sections 93-96.It is highly unlikely that CJEU rulings will be the end of this case.  
shareho1der
09/11/2016
14:28
that's that then
cudman
25/7/2016
01:31
It is like a Police having the power to force entry into your house on suspicion of crime. But you are entitled to compensation if you can prove that the Police caused damages or loss of your items or properties.
shareho1der
24/7/2016
18:49
This may sound confusing: By Law, The Irish Government does NOT need shareholders permission to intervene in a company that threatened its economy BUT its action in intervention must not breach shareholders rights like pre-emptions, nominal values, capital increases etc.The question many are asking is how/why can the government then breach shareholders rights if they are allowed to act without shareholders permission. That is for CJEU to decide and that is why they are paid fortune to entangled legal puzzles.
shareho1der
23/7/2016
15:49
The opinion of the advocate general of the CJEU was out on 22 June. AG Wahl raised some matter of interest regarding our case. In his opinion, Mr Wahl said it is legal for the Irish Government to intervened in recapitalising PTSB in 2011 without the permission of the shareholders. BUT the manner the Irish Finance Minister, Mr Noonan went about it that need to be thoroughly investigated. The opinion of the advocate generals are often accepted and reflected in CJEU rulings. If you bought shares in IPM before 27 July 2011, you could be entitled to generous compensation depending on the number of shares you bought. GLA !!!
shareho1der
21/7/2016
07:37
Cudman. Piotr and I are not giving up just yet.It's not over until the fat lady sings..
shareho1der
20/7/2016
12:54
Not a whole lot going on here, have almost given on up this. Looks a shambles.
cudman
11/5/2016
15:26
I doubt if anyone is still in here
shareho1der
12/4/2016
16:43
All too quiet here .Where is my friend investorpeasant.?What do you all think about the Court case next week 19 April ? In December, I sold all the shares I held since 2011 at £4.50 because I needed the money for Christmas. I am looking to buy back in when I have some funds.
shareho1der
10/9/2015
14:30
> This show that following Loverat's advice can cost you a great deal of money. Now, we intend to cost it all its remaining money.
harris2000
10/9/2015
11:11
Loverat represents the dregs of humanity. Lowlife, uneducated scum. Its poisonous partner, mclellan, was happily removed the human genepool on June 16 at 5pm on the A66. One must ask the obvious questions..........
harris2000
25/6/2015
09:45
the truth hurts they say
the stigologist
24/6/2015
21:07
The idiot is at it again masquerading as a barrack room lawyer on threads discussing legal matters. PMSL
the stigologist
04/6/2015
21:25
anybody seen the rodent doesn't seem to post anymore
the stigologist
25/5/2015
20:52
obviously as well as being a 'tedious and repulsive coward' the guy is seriously inept
the stigologist
25/5/2015
20:51
Loverat 19 Jun'11 - 10:28 0 1 I think it is time to set up a dedicated thread for shareholders to express their concerns at the prospect of IPM directors destroying the investments of ordinary hard working people. A group of shareholders are now campaigning for a fair deal. Yes - the Irish Government say that sacrifices have to be made to deal with the screw up by the last government. Fair enough - but the directors of our company should be fighting for our rights for a fair deal. What evidence is there that they have acted in the interests of shareholders so far? Not much. Judging by the letters Mr Cook sends to the Irish Government he may even be collaborating with the government to stitch up shareholders. Well, I have news for him - if he sells out on shareholders it will be shareholders who may very well be looking to him to reimburse their losses from his pocket. I will be posting up various links to the action being taken. Our solicitors: hxxp://www.lkgsolicitors.ie/
the stigologist
25/5/2015
20:51
Dream Ahead 23 May'15 - 10:58 - 8 of 8 1 0 Conclusive proof that Loverat's mouth is his own worst enemy. This is the same fool who supported the Langbar shareholders who decided to stick with the Company Scheme of Arrangement - only to find out years later that the Scheme was nothing more than the means to allow the management to get access to the money - and keep it for themselves through fees and share dilutions. Loverat attacked the Representative Action shareholders because they wanted a fairer share of their money back. Turned out that the RA shareholders received nearly 6 times the value back than the Scheme shareholders. This show that following Loverat's advice can cost you a great deal of money. I've since spoken to Scheme shareholders who wished that they never listened to this poisonous idiot and had joined the RA action instead.
the stigologist
25/5/2015
20:48
"Never get involved in action groups or campaigns as the people driving them are in it for themselves. " http://uk.advfn.com/cmn/fbb/thread.php3?id=25444686
the stigologist
23/5/2015
09:58
Conclusive proof that Loverat's mouth is his own worst enemy. This is the same fool who supported the Langbar shareholders who decided to stick with the Company Scheme of Arrangement - only to find out years later that the Scheme was nothing more than the means to allow the management to get access to the money - and keep it for themselves through fees and share dilutions. Loverat attacked the Representative Action shareholders because they wanted a fairer share of their money back. Turned out that the RA shareholders received nearly 6 times the value back than the Scheme shareholders. This show that following Loverat's advice can cost you a great deal of money. I've since spoken to Scheme shareholders who wished that they never listened to this poisonous idiot and had joined the RA action instead.
dream ahead
18/5/2015
08:17
New epic: IL0A . note its "Zero" not alphabetical "O"I think we should all move to the new board
shareho1der
Chat Pages: 174  173  172  171  170  169  168  167  166  165  164  163  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:33 V: D:20161209 05:48:18