Internetq Share Discussion Threads

[elrico] 29/1/2016 12:14

Sparky - the trend is down or have you got the graph the wrong ways about!

[elrico] 29/1/2016 12:12

Loverat - Are you a politician by chance? Your tactic is clear, make more noise and ignore the serious questions I put to you. There are only 4 question, you have not addressed a single one. Go back to 3252 and answer them instead of deflective tactics.

[costax1654x] 29/1/2016 07:21

Told you about PCGE,check the RNS from today,brilliant

[sparky333] 28/1/2016 22:13

Funny how the doomsayers work so hard when the direction is up.

[elrico] 28/1/2016 21:13

Loverat - What was the point of post 3255? If you knew of the history of both company's and TW's opinion of them you would know he was bearish of both! So, you unwhittingly blew TW's trumpet. Oh, and EK is a friend of TW which should underline once again how foolish you are. And for the record, I am no TW groupie I have my own mind, but when I read people like writing lies about him (it could be anyone I am familiar with), I feel people like you should be put right.

[elrico] 28/1/2016 21:05

Loverat - So far you have posted twice, both rants and both ignoring the questions in my post 3252. All you have done is offered opinions on what you percieved to be some sort of shorting ring camped out de-ramping company's.

If you have no proof to any of my questions, just admit it. INTQ is a busted flush and its creative waffle, smokes and mirrors will become clear, even to you in time. Question is, how much will remain of your investment before you realise? Zip is my best guess!

Take your emotion out of the game, take your loathing for TW and share price out of the game and open your blinkered eyes, you owe it to yourself.

[loverat] 28/1/2016 18:29

Double post

[firede] 28/1/2016 09:34

The Spotify article highlights exactly why InternetQ's story is not plausible, just like the Globo story.

InternetQ (Globo) operates in the music streaming (Enterprise Mobility Management) sector, where all the large companies, such as Spotify, Apple etc. (MobileIron, AirWatch) are loss making. At the same time InternetQ (Globo), the small company from Greece (Greece), is able to generate profits in the same sector. InternetQ (Globo) provides the explanation that they are profitable, because they do not offer any freemium version, but only a paid version (because they offer additional MADP capabilities).

The profitability is additionally achieved by InternetQ (Globo) spending significantly less on marketing than their competitors. At the same time InternetQ (Globo) only develops less than 10% of their technology internally and buys the remaining development from external developers, capitalizing the acquisition costs.

At least this is what InternetQ (Globo) and their financial statements will tell you.


I am 99% sure that InternetQ is going to go bust if no one is stupid enough to do a take-over or pay a high price for the remaining Akazoo shares. That is basically the only chance for the shareholders right now - someone incorrectly assigning a meaningful value to Akazoo.

[arlington chetwynd talbot] 28/1/2016 06:25

I like wide posts.

[eastbourne1982] 27/1/2016 23:40

I don't take much notice of brokers full stop, what they say about a company should be taken with a pinch of salt, full stop.

At the end of the day we are here to make £££;, if you'd bought INTQ a week or two ago you could have banked a profit of around 50%, all I'm interested in is whether I make money here, my initial buy is sitting on a loss however I've traded this three times since banking good profits, what will be will be, I would just like to see how it plays out and where something like Akazoo ends up.