We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intechnology | LSE:ITO | London | Ordinary Share | GB0001388932 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 24.00 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/6/2002 19:16 | lodger i think you need to be out of all of it. My sources tell me that there is some serious money heading in this direction. | paddyfool | |
11/6/2002 15:59 | The share transaction between directors announced a few minutes ago is significant new information because it involves real money @ 65p per share. This may well underpin the price and although I valued the stock in a post above at less than 60p, the directors should know more than me. I would not sell now. As an ironic aside one of the things which attracted my attention to this stock over a year ago was a share transaction between directors @ 75p a share, when the market price was about 300p. If anyone sees anything like this in any other stock, please post! | charlie | |
11/6/2002 09:42 | Try working out what the results for 2003 will bring and then try and put a valuation on it. It goes something like this: Cash burn +ve currently £23 million in the bank. Profits from established businesses likely to be in the region of £30 million. Valuation likely to be in the region of £3-400 million, the story is not about now but the future. | paddyfool | |
11/6/2002 09:38 | Sharecast write this morning that at 62.5p the stock is now valued at 53x forecast earnings, so that's forecast earnings of 1.18p -- which is a bit better than 0.6p in my notes above, but still a hideous rating. Anyone know who/where the 1.18p comes from? | charlie | |
11/6/2002 09:01 | Hmm. "Turnover in the year ended 31 March 2002 was £158.1 million, compared with £122.4 million in the period last year" ..."in the period" = in the 35-week period. A better comparison is from last year's results: Financial Highlights * Turnover of £122.4 million (£164.9 million proforma 52 weeks) | slightlycynical | |
11/6/2002 08:39 | Wilkinson says “Online Data Services will pass through breakeven towards the end of the year” (“Commenting on the results, Peter Wilkinson said…”, just above the contact details.) He also says goodwill amortisation will be £4m pa in future (“financial highlights” section). Suppose that (generously) we taken both these points at face value. The result before goodwill this year was profit 8.8m on Storage Solutions, loss 9.7m on Online Data Services (segmental information in note 2). If the latter “passes through breakeven towards the end of the year” that means it continues to lose money for most of the year so let’s say loss of 6m. Let’s also says Storage Solutions increases profits at a similar rate to last year to say 11m (VERY generous). On this basis the result this year might be 11m (Storage solutions) – 6m (Online Data Services) – 4m (goodwill ) = 1m. There are 155m shares in issue (note 4) so that gives eps of 1/155 = 0.6p per share this year. Note this is partly on HIS projections. With some slippage they could easily make a loss for the current year. And the share price is still above 60p!! There is however an underpin from the net cash of 15p per share. This is NOT going to go bust soon or anything, but it's worth less than 60p. | charlie | |
10/6/2002 16:15 | Blimey look at that protected seller of 100k @ 63p. | charlie | |
08/6/2002 19:04 | The two comments below are lifted straight from the iii board where they were posted in late May. At the moment I have not looked into BT's specific plans. However the general point is that ITO's business has no patent protection, and no strong intellectual property of any kind. As and when BT (or anyone else big) does muscle in, with partners like EMC and Dell, then ITO are going to be absolutely crushed. Here are the two comments: "Sales team at Intec are still seeing their wages take a tumble due to lack of sales in data storage. Now BT plans on selling this product and stand to make a far better job. " ----- "BT's data storage plan fails to set City on fire By Tony Glover Fri 24 May 2002 The City is sceptical about BT Group's latest strategy for BT Ignite: a plan to deliver £190m in extra revenue a year by 2004/5 with the launch of a new data storage service for business customers in partnership with EMC and Dell. " | charlie | |
06/6/2002 12:44 | AMT37 - ? Results not out till next Tuesday. And winning contracts is normal run of business. Exceptionally big ones only help if on top of normal expectations for the timespan in question. The market doesn't seem to think the last one was significant enough to do more than rebalance a prior shortfall? | m.t.glass | |
06/6/2002 12:10 | Results in line Large contracts won | amt37 | |
06/6/2002 10:27 | Short more at 73. | lodger | |
06/6/2002 09:58 | Bid now 70p! | charles7 | |
06/6/2002 09:50 | Still short (from about 11 months ago!!) | charlie | |
06/6/2002 09:39 | Here is a little snippet from Today's Telegraph. On the Alternative Investment Market, Intechnology edged .5 lower to 79.5p amid speculation that analysts are overestimating the likely performance of the data technology specialist this year. Selling off again Today. | mug punter | |
06/6/2002 09:37 | Here is that snippet from the Telegraph. On the Alternative Investment Market, Intechnology edged .5 lower to 79.5p amid speculation that analysts are overestimating the likely performance of the data technology specialist this year. Selling continuing Today. | mug punter | |
06/6/2002 08:01 | Still short (from about 6 weeks ago). Just waiting for it to crumble... | lodger | |
06/6/2002 07:18 | Negative comment in The Telegraph re imminent results (next Tuesday). | m.t.glass | |
16/5/2002 23:21 | 3 of the 7 MMs moved down after that 10k 11am trade.. | m.t.glass | |
16/5/2002 23:20 | 3 of the 7 MMs cut their prices after that 11am 10k trade.. | m.t.glass | |
13/5/2002 13:33 | in their recent May newsletter claim this stock is overvalued | dave46 | |
08/5/2002 09:25 | Saw that 2Deano - :O( Some MMs now reversing down again. No news that I can find so far. Edit: Make that WERE reversing.. | m.t.glass | |
08/5/2002 09:15 | Just to let you guys know: Price ticking up: Up 6.5p on 76k volume ( buys ) Time now: 10:15 Regards. | 2deano | |
08/5/2002 09:15 | Just to let you guys know: Price ticking up: Up 6.5p on 76k volume ( buys ) Time now: 10:15 Regards. | 2deano | |
07/5/2002 10:59 | Onwards and downwards... doooooooooomed. | m.t.glass | |
07/5/2002 10:56 | Whatever... meanwhile onwards and downwards! | m.t.glass |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions