Inland Homes Share Discussion Threads

[peter27] 19/5/2016 10:38

As cost overruns are quoted I expect they quoted Inl a price and then got squeezed by higher subbies costs.

[igbertsponk] 19/5/2016 09:29

Looks as if Vantage are a contractor who employ the subbies. Sensible of INL to stop paying them if they're in trouble and engage the subbies direct. Otherwise you end up paying twice for the same work.

[cockerhoop] 19/5/2016 08:54

Researching other stuff and came across this.

[yupawiese2010] 18/5/2016 18:15

Mixed use development plans for Randalls in Uxbridge.

[igbertsponk] 18/5/2016 15:38

Don't think INL are just about brownfield - they're dealmakers and good at planning. Happy for them to look at anything in the property sphere that they can work their magic on.

[rikaughty] 18/5/2016 14:48

Locally to me in the NW, there is a lot of green areas being built upon. In particular places that have been trying for some time for planning.

[mjcrockett] 18/5/2016 09:40

The Little Chalfont development is hardly the usual Inland brownfield site. Is this a one off or does it mark a change of strategy?

[igbertsponk] 18/5/2016 09:29

The local plan does not show a choice of places to build - all of those highlighted are ones they want to allocate to build on.
Main problem for INL is that they're going for planning before the local plan has been adopted.

[huttonr] 18/5/2016 09:26

I've also just looked at the Little Chalfont plan on page 32 - According to the OS map for the area, the larger suggested site to the south of the railway is mostly ocupied by the golf club. I would think that attempts to build on this would create more opposition than the Inland Homes site.
The Roman villa site looks to be some 500 metres from the Inland site so possibly not a problem?

[source] 17/5/2016 22:12

Hope they beat these nimby's. Regards,Source.

[mjcrockett] 17/5/2016 18:28

I am surprised that Inland are trying to get planning permission for the field in Little Chalfont. I know the area well. The northern perimeter is part of a very popular walk along the Chess Valley. Also beside the "Inland Field" is the site of a Roman Villa. So, I would expect the locals to put up a big fight to stop this development.

The other areas highlighted on the Page 32 plan look much better bets in my view.

[garybaldy] 17/5/2016 14:21

The site is only about two miles from the IH office so they should be very familiar with the local situation and 'politics'.

[igbertsponk] 17/5/2016 12:01

And if you look at Page 32 of this, you'll see that that site is earmarked for housing in the medium term.

[source] 16/5/2016 19:47

Good spot Igersponk.
Regards,
Source.

[igbertsponk] 16/5/2016 16:23

Planning news

[dt1010] 15/5/2016 19:04

I will top up there, even at today's price it is cheap though.

[mrthomas] 14/5/2016 09:45

Brought in the past in 2015 and if the price gets to mid 60 will buy in again

[garybaldy] 14/5/2016 07:40

All that wealth but they don't know how to knot a tie...

[dt1010] 11/5/2016 21:03

This will go back to mid sixties if mid seventies doesn't hold.

Nice buying opportunity.

[caradog] 11/5/2016 13:59

I see that Inland's funding partners appear in the Panama Papers:

Those investors who pay tax will be amused to find out that Nick Candy has children called Cayman and Monaco. Nice to think that Inland is putting business their way.

[igbertsponk] 11/5/2016 12:37

London Mayor effect. Will drag down all London and surrounds housebuilders as new chap tries to build more low cost sheds.

[badtime] 11/5/2016 12:04

Gone very quiet here...sp drifting.....base figure guesses?

[dt1010] 15/4/2016 21:29

Support here at 75p should hold, we hope

[norbert colon] 15/4/2016 16:00

David - yes remember that well - lots a few quid when they went bust!