We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imagesound | LSE:ISD | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002632569 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 5.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/3/2007 10:52 | Well it seems to me it depends on what you call good. An improvement from where they were with debt down a long way. The underlying profit number seems to be as expected @ £0.6m in the CS note and equates to just under 1p eps. If the forecast of 2.4p eps this year holds good the PE is now under 6. The problem is there are one offs, amortisation and goodwill, tax credits and the presentation of this is all over the place and no adjusted EPS number yet again in the results. Your average investor will look at this and only see the headline loss imo. I'll hold onto those I have left. I suspect that buying by CS yesterday reveals more than the results. If I'm wrong I'll be selling down the line and lower I expect but someone had their buying gloves on yesterday in style imo. CR | cockneyrebel | |
08/3/2007 09:43 | I think I agree with Ptolemy. The results seemed to be OK - although not sparkling - but were not dressed very well. The PI has been buying the story but the majority of us have been let down by the company who cannot present results in a straightforward manner as other companies appear to do. Why is the eps not presented with a figure that we can all understand? I reckon they only missed slightly - true eps may be about 1p - and PTP was in-line with what CS had forecast. There was a useful announcement hidden in these results about a good contract but whereas other companies would have issued that with a separate RNS the £100 it costs to release an RNS was obviously too much and not viewed as a valid PR exercise. If they came in at 1p or better and are still on course for 2p+ (CS say 2.4p at the moment) then they are on a PE of only 6.5 this morning which is still very cheap. Why did CS hold on at 16.5p for so long yesterday? They fought a lone battle for some reason even if they have capitulated today on a much lower volume? The cynic in me says someone is trying to get stock on the cheap. With such a poorly presented set of results (and they were asked to clear it up next time after the interims) I can only come to the conclusion that a MBO might be an option. All IMO and probably way off the mark. | doubleorquits | |
08/3/2007 09:38 | Ptolemy I'd agree with that. Yesterday's selling totally understandable, and I guess CS must have had a short book as I've not seen any buys coming through to account for what they hoovered up yesterday. A matter of seeing where this bottoms first, though can't imagine it'll be too long before we see directors buying again. An updated note urgently needed from CS. | njp | |
08/3/2007 09:14 | I disagree they were a poor set of results. Where I do agree is that they were poorly presented. You have to look at where they came from (debt, low margin, fragmented) and what they have achieved since 2005. If they continue this progress (i.e. deliver 2007 - current year - forecasts) they are on a PE less than 7. This is a success story - badly presented. | ptolemy | |
08/3/2007 08:59 | I'm out. Take my loss and move on. It will come good one day - but not today. | lord gnome | |
08/3/2007 08:58 | They were a poor set of results yesterday. Someone was obviously taken in by the headline grabbing rise in ebitda from 1 to 1.6m. They didnt realise that the second half Ebitda was 10% lower than the first half. That doesn't bode well going forward for a business who's accounts presentation is a complete mess. | nickcduk | |
08/3/2007 08:55 | Todays mark down of 1p, or 6% so far, is on a paltry volume of 35,000 sells. Yesterdays drop, on over 900,000 sells was 0.75p ! | masurenguy | |
08/3/2007 08:49 | expectation from here on in LG? | mikey_b | |
08/3/2007 08:48 | Down again. This is getting boring. | lord gnome | |
08/3/2007 02:02 | Looking at trades today, total volume was around 1.325m. Of that 308K were buys, 97K was an X, and then 920K of sells roughly imo. The slack equates to roughly 602K shares, or around 105K pounds sterling of stock. | papalpower | |
08/3/2007 00:00 | Why's Collins Stewart buying so many then? I can't see a single buy today - 1.4m sold and the bid hardly moved from 8.30am. I reckon there was 1.2m sol dafter 8.30 am and the bid hardly flinched - 10K normally moves an MM. Who's buying that lot? CR | cockneyrebel | |
07/3/2007 20:55 | The stockmarket report from UK-AnaIyst.com on March 7th 2007 A cautious results statement sent shares in Imagesound (ISD) 1p lower to 16.75p. The instore music provider unveiled a narrowing in its full year loss to 772,000 pounds, though remained cautious on its outlook. Revenues were up 4% to 8.2 million pounds, but the group said that the retail markets remained challenging. Tell us something we don't know! | spangle93 | |
07/3/2007 20:20 | Well certainly not the positive set of accounts and forward statement that I was looking for. Market reaction only too predictable, in fact, surprised we aren't down more than 1p on the day. I guess we need to thank CS for that. Ho humm, dreams of instant riches postponed again. Let's hope for a positive spin from CS in a post results broker note. | lord gnome | |
07/3/2007 18:31 | Filter him and the ghastly pickies disappear! | paxton208 | |
07/3/2007 15:40 | thanks Spangle93. | mikey_b | |
07/3/2007 15:32 | Collins Stewart - house broker | spangle93 | |
07/3/2007 15:25 | CR, CS note? thanks, M | mikey_b | |
07/3/2007 15:19 | I have sold a third actually Ian. Just because I hold so many and I don't fully grasp the results. But there is over 1m sells today and they are all being soaked up - all by house broker Collins Stewart so I think we don't fully grasp the results or they have been dubbed down in order to let someone buy a load. In normal times if 1m was sold we'd be down 30%+ in this market. Rest of my holding is in the wife's pension so I'm pretty relaxed with those - she's a fair way from retirement, well further away than me anyway!. Bet there's a decent CS note coming out and they are putting their clients in the stock in advance - or a director buy. CR | cockneyrebel | |
07/3/2007 12:58 | Certainly looks as though there's a buyer in the wings hoovering up stock, as the share price is still only a penny lower after what now appear to be sales of over 1.1m shares and no purchases, and the house broker is still the best bid.IMO. | george62 | |
07/3/2007 12:38 | If CR holds more than the FD he couldn't sell if he wanted to not anywhere near the current price anyway! with a nms of just 2000 shares hard to shift any decent amount of stock. | dave88 | |
07/3/2007 11:31 | Well, I'm sure glad that you're not selling yet CR. After all, you hold more than the FD if memory serves me! | iandippie | |
07/3/2007 11:13 | If all those trades showing this morning are sells and these are off just 1p then there's a big buyer about for a lot of them imo. CR | cockneyrebel | |
07/3/2007 10:51 | ...although the next day after the interims, the FD bought 35,000 shares. So, will history repeat itself tomorrow... | iandippie |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions