We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hurricane Energy Plc | LSE:HUR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B580MF54 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 7.79 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/2/2017 13:46 | I agree the drill will at least start to answer if Lancaster & Halifax are one field. Couple of points if it is one field. It is still possible for the API at Halifax to be a bit different to Lancaster - depends a lot on source and how the field filled among other things. Secondly, the hydrocarbon/water pressure regime may not be the same across such a big field. That could mean the OWC is not identical at Halifax and Lancaster. The OWC may be tilted over 30+kms. Not disagreeing with the caution, it will be a huge field if it comes in, just suggesting the drill results might need careful interpretation. | perfecthindsight | |
14/2/2017 13:31 | oilandgas, data room is already open. | garymegson | |
14/2/2017 13:31 | "Pure wishful thinking on your part. You have no idea what any major will do- nor do any of us. The way they manage risk there is still a very good chance that they won`t do anything but wait...Even if Halifax is a success." Nicebut - Ok, HUR make a FID for the FPSO. Lancaster then flows as Dr T predicts "Lancaster should be a fantastic producer" we put the price up, significanly! BH | bloodhound | |
14/2/2017 13:29 | Getting very excited . | gary38 | |
14/2/2017 13:26 | i reckon alastair stobie right now is speaking to a co. that knows it wants a bit! | leeson31 | |
14/2/2017 13:18 | nicebut agreed I have no idea what any major will do, with the vast amounts of oil and information being produced it has to be a possibility that such an outcome could result | laserdisc | |
14/2/2017 13:10 | Or P&A, of course! ;-#(( | thegreatgeraldo | |
14/2/2017 13:08 | Pounddreamer, oilandgas and others - many thanks. Sorry for being a lazy toad! I'm sure others will appreciate the helpful info. and hopefull wll also pile in - and help drive the rise! I'm in for another wedge..can't resist this share, the ultimate story is just so compelling. | soggy | |
14/2/2017 13:08 | You're a bit muddled with Halifax.... drill, test, then drill deeper.... | thegreatgeraldo | |
14/2/2017 13:05 | Soggy.. news due and IMHO rough timeline Feb: lincoln : flow test complete and still due more information on Lincoln,that in itself could add significant incremental value via tie-back to the Lancaster development hub 28Feb- 13mar: Halifax drilling completed? Mar17: Data room open? 31Mar - 16apr: Halifax Flow test 31mar: Lancaster CPR Apr17: Capex: debt , placing, Farm out Capex and funding plans? Farm in? Sale? Jul17: FPSO status update, Aoka Mizu for the Early Production System | oilandgas1 | |
14/2/2017 13:02 | laserdisc, Pure wishful thinking on your part. You have no idea what any major will do- nor do any of us. The way they manage risk their is still a very good chance that they won`t do anything but wait...Even if Halifax is a success. | nicebut | |
14/2/2017 12:56 | due to the chart I waited for the right moment and now I doubled my holding. there always was pre RNS buying and local higher highs and an all time high made my decision. all is underpinned by value. one way or the other will be extracted. I just need to be lucky as no one knows atm | kaos3 | |
14/2/2017 12:48 | hur have significant amounts of oil which ever way the drill goes, if its continuous then the big oil companies will take note ,I feel they will put their fortunes in the form of an offer for hur rather than use their capital on exploration drills, AS going on about size etc that's what the big majors want, just a matter of being patient, I see little downside from here whichever way this goes. | laserdisc | |
14/2/2017 12:33 | But it's wait for the drill. Can't fault that, but there does seem to be a view round here that it must be the case that they are continuous. That's clearly nonsense, that's why companies spend significant fortunes on exploration drills.Peter | greyingsurfer | |
14/2/2017 11:51 | laser - thanks for the explanation. All - it is indeed going to be exciting. Will try and up my stake. | sheep_herder | |
14/2/2017 11:49 | exploration model describes Lancaster and Halifax as a single hydrocarbon accumulation.Go with the knowledge | laserdisc | |
14/2/2017 11:49 | Rayrac, kind of agree with you just trying not to get ahead of myself. For our conservative board to highlight one accumulation as a possibility they must be quite happy there's a fair chance. The diagram in the last presentation does suggest this. | gisjob2 | |
14/2/2017 11:42 | But it's wait for the drill. They should be fairly close to it now and if there's a leaky on board, then the share price could spike. | rayrac | |
14/2/2017 11:39 | If! They are separate accumulations. But I'll go with the seismic, same probably as dr rice, just one giant feature. | rayrac | |
14/2/2017 11:37 | There will be faults and fractures etc all over the ridge but what is needed to create separate accumulations would be a sealing fault, whatever that looks like. I assume it involves some sort of slippage in the strata, which as you say Rayrac, should show up in the seismic I would think. | jacks13 | |
14/2/2017 11:34 | Rayrac, apparently the further you go along the Rona Ridge towards Halifax the lighter the oil is likely to become and thus potentially gas. This is what I've been told if they are separate accumulations. I haven't researched this and simply took it at face value so make of it what you will! | ngms27 | |
14/2/2017 11:31 | TELBAP ,BEST POST OF THE DAY | gibso6767 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions