Hummingbird Resources Share Discussion Threads

[rileyma] 11/4/2017 16:06

Hum on whats hot
Youtube lse channel

[charles clore] 11/4/2017 15:58

This should be at least 30p imho

[wilco1000] 11/4/2017 14:59

With the gold price where it is now the incentive is certainly there to get the stuff out the ground as soon as possible

[wilco1000] 11/4/2017 14:57

Thanks westmoreland, certainly they haven't put a foot wrong as yet

[westmoreland lad] 11/4/2017 10:29

wilco -- 1st gold pour is targeted for 19th December. See interview with Dan Betts on Stocktube via HUM website.

I would wager they will beat the above date and on budget. Quality team @ HUM !

[wilco1000] 11/4/2017 09:55

Anyone know exactly when during 2017 the first gold pour is anticipated? Q4?

[substp] 11/4/2017 09:26

Do I see an additional $15 million tacked on compared to the last Taurus deal?

[rileyma] 11/4/2017 09:08

Great news today

Bridging loan repaid

Improved fianance terms

[aim999] 03/4/2017 23:44

Pala must nearly be out now ... we have had quite a number of 500k or 1m trades since their holding RNS

[buffythebuffoon] 03/4/2017 07:44

Thanks for your responses; much appreciated.

Buffy

[meanreverter] 02/4/2017 20:33

Buffy ... HUM has a lot more gold, it has raised much of the capital needed to develop the mine, and construction is well under way. So I would prefer it to MARL at present prices.

That said, MARL has an asset of amazing quality. It will be producing at a huge profit margin whatever the price of gold. Also, its property is only partly explored; there is possibly a lot more to come. It has a strong 70% partner, and will probably be able to raise the capital needed for mine development without horrible dilution.

On balance, I would buy both, but put more into HUM. Prem's 60:40 looks about right to me. Of course, there are many other gold juniors to consider ... .

[prem124] 02/4/2017 19:20

I agree with above. Most of my investments are on TSX.V but only hold 2 companies on AIM MARL and HUM with about 50 % more invested in HUM.

[bookwormrobert] 02/4/2017 10:44

Clearly, Hummingbird Resources. Firstly, the quality of Hummingbird's management is excellent (and always look at the quality of the management in mining shares before even glancing at the claimed resource). Secondly, it's not a 30% holder of a stake in a joint venture dominated by a Turkish partner, with all the extra business and political risk that implies. All IMHO, of course.

[buffythebuffoon] 02/4/2017 09:31

Mariana Resources and Hummingbird have the same market cap. Would anybody who has experience investing in gold mining companies kindly give their opinion as to which, if either, is clearly a better investment proposition.

Many thanks.

Buffy

[rileyma] 01/4/2017 19:24

Keep an eye on the twitter feed
Updated far more regulary than the company site

[chipperfrd] 01/4/2017 17:49

Latest video is worth a look!

[divmad] 01/4/2017 17:09

Does the video tell if construction is ahead of, or on schedule?

[charles clore] 01/4/2017 16:54

Aim999 - very impressive video from this totally professional company. Hummingbird is a model of correctness in exploration, planning and construction imho.

[aim999] 01/4/2017 04:53

Check the website and watch the full video..... they are really making progress

[westmoreland lad] 31/3/2017 20:03

Div -- can't even get a picture. Try again rileyma please.

[divmad] 31/3/2017 19:41

Did you get sound on that clip?

[lasata] 23/3/2017 16:51

Looks like they switched in to this





Pala News



13th March 2017

Pala invests $10 million in Itafos

[4seeaproblem] 23/3/2017 09:57

No idea...but perhaps they are selling because of the chart. It seems quite consistent & repeatable. If the past repeats itself, the share price will retrace back to 22.5-23p.