ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

HAL Halosource CP S

0.55
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Halosource CP S LSE:HAL London Ordinary Share VGG425271126 ORD USD0.0001 (REG S) (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.55 0.00 00:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
  -
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- O 0 0.55 GBX

Halosource CP S (HAL) Latest News

Real-Time news about Halosource CP S (London Stock Exchange): 0 recent articles

Halosource CP S (HAL) Discussions and Chat

Halosource CP S Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
03/10/201808:21Halosource - Clean Water Tech (S reg)15
06/8/201306:56Halliburton: Jobs for the Boys in UK and IRAQ130
08/8/200606:31SERIOUS FRAUD SQUAD PROBE HALLIBURTON BRIBERY-

Add a New Thread

Halosource CP S (HAL) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type

Halosource CP S (HAL) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 10/1/2014 14:03 by sammy_smith
LISTEN: HaloSource (HAL) - Trading Update

Click the link below to listen
Posted at 01/10/2012 09:42 by andrbea
big fall on HAL
while sister share HALO is blue

weird markets these.......
Posted at 21/10/2010 19:55 by stegrego
Hi,

Nope, the news seems to only appear on the ticker HAL, thats what they release the RNS's under.

So we can move thread, but it wont have any news in the news box....
Posted at 21/10/2010 15:18 by tenapen
Hi Stegrego,
Thanks for starting this Halosource thread. It will prove very confuseing to hold Halo shares but post on this Hal thread !. As you point out there will not be many holders of Hal so i wondered, if you deleted this thread would the RNS switch over to the Halo thread ?. Anyway good thread and i hope it gets very busy :-).

Regards.
Posted at 21/10/2010 11:31 by stegrego
HAL is Reg S registered and not Crest, whereas HALO is the ticker for the DI and Crest registered shares.

I think the HAL ones need to you to fill in one of those forms for dealing in US shares but not sure.

Ive created 2 threads, but this appears to be the one with the news ticker on, so even though these arent the shares most people will buy, its the thread i will use (unless any of the above info is wrong)
Posted at 21/10/2010 11:25 by stegrego
Admission to trading follows a placing of the company's new and existing Common Shares, which raised approximately £50.4 million ($80 million) before expenses, of which approximately £31.5 million ($50 million) was raised for the Company and approximately £18.9 million ($30 million) for certain selling shareholders. The Company will be capitalised at approximately £100 million ($158 million), at the placing price of 135 pence per share, when the shares commence trading this morning. Following the placing, HaloSource has 73,771,162 Common Shares in issue.



The unrestricted Common Shares trade under the ticker HALO.LN with ISIN US40638H1086 and may be traded as Depositary Interests in CREST. The new Common Shares and some of the existing Common Shares trade under the ticker HAL.LN with ISIN USU4063G1077 and are Reg S restricted and therefore trade outside CREST.


HaloSource is a clean water technology company, headquartered in Seattle, US with operations in India and China. It is focused on the provision of cleaner, clearer and safer water using its proprietary N-halamine bead technology to clean and purify water, killing bacteria and viruses that may cause disease.


While HaloPure provides safer drinking water; SeaKlear and StormKlear products use a second technology based on natural bio-polymers to provide water clarification and antimicrobial applications for treating recreational and environmental water; and HaloShield facilitates the binding of chlorine-based bleach to textiles such as sheets, lab coats and towels.


About HaloSource's Markets

HaloPure products are principally targeted at consumers in emerging market countries, where access to safe drinking water is particularly poor. In an independent analysis of the global Point of Use drinking water device market, Frost and Sullivan concluded that:

· the market for residential water treatment equipment in China was estimated at $960 million in 2005, growing at an annual rate of 20.4 per cent between 2004 and 2011;

· the market for residential drinking water devices in India was estimated at $425 million in 2009, and experiencing growth of approximately 25 per cent annually; and

· in 2005 the global markets for filtration formats in the form of under-the-sink, counter top and replacement cartridges were growing annually at 20 per cent, 21 per cent and 18 per cent, respectively.

The World Health Organisation has estimated that 1.1 billion people lack access to safe drinking water and the Centre for Disease Control is recommending Point Of Use filtration and disinfection.




Other HALO thread -
Posted at 26/1/2007 12:36 by ariane
Halliburton 4Q profit declines


HOUSTON (AFX) - Oil industry services provider Halliburton Co. said Friday
its fourth-quarter profit fell 40 percent, due in large part to a year-ago gain,
but the results still managed to beat Wall Street's expectations.
Earnings fell to $658 million, or 64 cents per share, compared with $1.1
billion, or $1.04 per share, during the same period a year ago.
The prior year's results benefited from $540 million, or 51 cents per share,
of income related to a reduction in a deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
Analysts polled by Thomson Financial were looking for earnings of 61 cents
per share.
"Although we experienced weather-related activity decreases and holiday
impacts in the United States during the fourth quarter, we expect demand for our
services to remain strong throughout 2007," Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Dave Lesar said in a statement.
Quarterly revenue rose 8 percent to $6.02 billion from $5.57 billion in the
previous year on more activity in the company's energy services group, which was
partially offset by lower revenue from KBR due to decreased activity on
government services projects for the military.
KBR sales fell to $2.5 billion from $2.7 billion.
Consensus estimates put fourth-quarter revenue at $5.9 billion.
Posted at 16/2/2006 06:23 by ariane
American engineers in line for jobs until 2080 on Britain's nuclear clean-upGovernment prepares first tender for this year

Terry Macalister
Thursday February 16, 2006
Guardian

A small group of American companies such as Bechtel and Fluor look set to grab the lion's share of a £50bn British nuclear clean-up programme which should get the green light within weeks but take decades to complete.The government will start this latest privatisation by approving a draft strategy for dealing with the legacy of the atomic power industry, submitted by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. It is also expected to give the go-ahead for the controversial sell-off of state-owned British Nuclear Group (BNG), the operating arm of British Nuclear Fuels, which manages the huge Sellafield fuel reprocessing plant in Cumbria.

It comes as the operation of Sellafield has been criticised for the way it accounts for nuclear materials. Yesterday BNG was warned by the European commission that that it was failing to meet EU standards and told to step up its controls.

The first tender in the privatisation process however will probably involve management of the low-level waste site at Drigg, near Sellafield, and is likely to go out this year. This summer the energy minister, Malcolm Wicks, will receive an expert report and make his own recommendation to Tony Blair on how to bury nuclear waste, an issue that his predecessors have, in his words, "disgracefully" neglected.

The issue has become of burning importance in Whitehall because the authorities are in the middle of an energy review which, among other things, must consider whether a new generation of atomic plants should be built.

The government accepts that a sceptical public would not even consider this relatively carbon-neutral alternative until it felt confident that serious steps were being made to tackle the legacy of the past. But so far, decommissioning has been slow at parts of Sellafield and seven of the 11 Magnox reactor sites, such as Hunterston A, Hinkley Point A and Bradwell, which have already ceased operation.

American companies have already started positioning themselves for the privatisation of the British clean-up. Some of the jargon in the decommissioning agency's draft strategy reveals who helped write it - Bechtel, which acts as a consultant to the agency. Equally, Fluor is already helping BNG with decommissioning at Sellafield and has 21 staff in Britain to help.

Other US companies are jockeying for position: · CH2Hill has teamed up with the state-owned UK Atomic Energy Authority in a consortium that is expected to bid for decommissioning work.

· EnergySolutions, a company controlled by New York venture capitalists, has just bought BNG's American arm for around $80m (£46m) and says it will be competing for British work.

· Bechtel, which controls part of London Underground, Jacobs, and other US engineering firms are considered by industry experts to be the most likely to purchase BNG, probably through a consortium.

BNFL, meanwhile, has just sold Westinghouse, its US-based nuclear engineering and design business, to Toshiba for $5.4bn (£3.1bn) leaving it with BNG, research arm Nexia and a one-third stake in the uranium enrichment company, Urenco.

No one inside or outside the companies and agencies of the British nuclear business wants to be quoted publicly, but there is a consensus that large foreign engineering firms are almost certain to be the winners.

"You only have to look around and see who is really interested and has the experience in the nuclear waste problems. There is the odd French or Japanese firm, but basically it is the large US firms," said one industry expert.

The American companies are likely to try to beef up their Britishness by bringing in domestic firms or organisations. The Atomic Energy Authority will be in demand, as will Amec, one of the few British firms of any size to commit itself to nuclear.

Lawrie Haynes, the chief executive of BNG, is an enthusiastic champion of a sell-off involving his company. "There are many reasons for placing BNG inside the ownership of a major business. We need a partner with project management skills and bidding skills who can bring in new people and allow our existing staff to widen their career opportunities," he says.

However he is clear that BNG needs an owner committed to safety and engineering rather than a financial buyer looking for a quick return on capital. "I want a trade buyer. I want someone who can help with the performance of a complex site such as Sellafield, not someone who is worried every minute about the share price," he says.

Sellafield is one of the biggest nuclear sites in Europe, employing more than 10,000 people, and is far more complex than other sites which tend to house single power plants. Such is its complexity there is talk of decommissioning work being broken up into separate contracts.

The site is home to Calder Hall, the first British civil nuclear station, and an array of other operations including Thorp, the spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant, and SMP, which was built to produce Mixed Oxide Fuel for overseas customers using plutonium and uranium. Formerly known as Windscale, it is the site where plutonium was produced for nuclear weapons.

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority believes the Sellafield clean-up will take at least 75 years. Legacy issues there include the continuing clean-up resulting from the 1957 shutdown as a result of a fire, and dealing with a number of "ponds" where waste was dumped fairly indiscriminately.

The scale of the problems at the 770-acre site near Whitehaven is spelled out in the decommissioning authority's draft strategy. "At Sellafield, it has been estimated that there may be as much as 20 million cubic metres of contaminated land, some of which is deep underground, resulting largely from leakages from legacy sites," it says.

At the B30 storage pond, the European commission has complained that it has not been possible to carry out checks to ensure that fissile materials intended for the civil nuclear programme have not been diverted to the military. The government denies this but the decommissioning authority admits: "Delays in spent fuel retrieval have resulted in the long-term underwater storage of the spent fuel in B30, which has resulted in serious degradation of the fuel."

Dave Skilbeck, who is in charge of the B41 solid waste storage "silo" at Sellafield, admits that there is only a partial inventory of what was thrown into the facility he is decommissioning.

Some of the problems, according to BNG managers, stem from when the plant was asked to work flat out during the miners' strike of 1984-5 to keep the lights on. Waste problems were rather pushed to one side.

Standing in the howling wind at the top of the reinforced concrete tower with only the odd seagull as company, he says: "There was no thought of how you dealt with this later."

In numbers:

Estimated cost of the entire nuclear clean-up programme: £50bn

Estimated cubic metres of contaminated land around Sellafield: 20m

Minimum number of years nuclear clean-up is expected to take: 75

Number of employees at the Sellafield nuclear plant: 10,000

FAQ

What is nuclear decommissioning and clean-up?

It is dismantling nuclear power stations and other plants at the end of their working life. They must be taken down step by step and the site left, in theory, as it was originally.

What about the waste?

This is being looked at separately. But a decision will be made - hopefully this year - on how to bury or dispose of in other ways all the nuclear waste produced in this country so far.

Who controls decommissioning?

The state National Decommissioning Authority (NDA), under Sir Anthony Cleaver, was established in April with a £2bn-a-year budget for waste.

How long will all this take?

Within 25 years the NDA hopes to have all 11 Magnox power stations cleared and available for alternative use. It intends to do likewise at research facilities at Harwell, Oxfordshire; at the Winfrith experimental reactor site in Dorset and the uranium enrichment plant at Capenhurst, near Chester. It could take 75 years to fully decommission the most complex site, Sellafield.

Why are foreign companies poised to win contracts?

Decommissioning is thought likely to be achieved more quickly and more efficiently by the private sector. Much of the financial muscle and expertise is based in the United States.

Is it sensible to sell British Nuclear Group, our own nuclear operator and decommissioning expert?

The government thinks it is but critics question why the bulk of the British nuclear industry is being dismantled and sold at a time when we might be going ahead with a new generation of atomic power stations.
Posted at 02/9/2004 17:45 by grupo guitarlumber
CSFB upgrades oils; firm favors oilfield service stocks

By Lisa Sanders
Last Updated: 9/2/2004 12:18:18 PM



DALLAS (CBS.MW) - CS First Boston said Thursday it favors oilfield service stocks as it upgraded the oil sector and raised the ratings on Schlumberger and Noble Corp.

Schlumberger (SLB) shares rose by 61 cents to $63.58, and Noble (NE) stock gained 66 cents to last trade at $41.95. The Philadelphia Oil Service Index (OSX) was up 0.6 percent at 113.03, and the Merrill Lynch Oil Service HOLDRS (OIH) advanced 53 cents to $75.68.

It was the third time in four days that Wall Street firms put out bullish calls on oil-service stocks. Lehman Bros. on Monday and Merrill Lynch on Tuesday said they're encouraged about the prospects for the group because of commodity prices and the expectation of increased exploration and production spending. See Market Focus.

On Thursday, CSFB upgraded the oil sector to "5 percent overweight" from "benchmark," in line with new oil price forecasts to $28 a barrel from $21 a barrel.

"As before, our prime focus is on the beneficiaries of an increase in oil companies' spending," analyst Andrew Garthwaite wrote in a research report.

Halliburton (HAL) is a favorite, Garthwaite said. Schlumberger and Noble were upgraded to "outperform" from "neutral."

"Incremental upstream spending should be increasingly directed toward offshore and international projects, playing to Schlumberger's strengths," analyst Ken Sill wrote.

Noble's valuation and strengthening offshore drilling fundamentals led to an upgrade for that company's stock, he said.

"While recent share performance has been strong, the shares have lagged the Oil Service Index year-to-date and over the past 12 months, and we believe that there is substantial upside given accelerating offshore dayrates," Sill said.

On the integrated oil side, CSFB likes BP (BP) for its free cash flow and volume growth. From the exploration and production group, Devon Energy (DVN) is a top pick. CSFB upgraded the E&P group to "overweight" from "market weight."

"The shift...reflects our conviction that long-term commodity prices will remain strong and than an efficient market will eliminate the arbitrage between the merger and acquisition market and the share prices," analyst Phillip Pace wrote.

Separately, CSFB raised its rating on the integrated oil and gas group to "market weight" from "underweight."

"Factoring our view that oil prices will stay higher for longer into valuations, we now find that the integrated oil sector moves from trading at a 4 percent premium to fair value in absolute terms to a discount of 9.4 percent," analyst Mark Flannery wrote in explanation of the upgrade.

Flannery also raised his recommendation on Amerada Hess (AHC) to "outperform" from "neutral," primarily because of the upward revision to oil prices but also because of Amerada's progress in reorganizing its portfolio and positioning itself for the future.
Posted at 22/3/2004 17:52 by grupo guitarlumber
By Ben McClure
March 22, 2004
If you were an oil company CEO with major development plans, would you feel comfortable contracting work to Halliburton (NYSE: HAL)? With all the bad press facing the energy and oilfield services giant, probably not. Criminal investigations over government contract shenanigans in Iraq and the prospect of liquidity problems at Halliburton could easily translate into profits for its biggest rival: Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB).
Halosource CP S share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock