We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GKN | LSE:GKN | London | Ordinary Share | GB0030646508 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 482.40 | 481.00 | 481.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
TIDMGKN
RNS Number : 9308A
GKN PLC
29 March 2017
GKN plc 2016 annual report
GKN plc has today published its 2016 annual report and circular to shareholders incorporating the notice of the 2017 annual general meeting. Both documents can be viewed at or downloaded from http://www.gkn.com/en/investors/.
Copies of both documents, together with the form of proxy for the 2017 AGM, have been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism and will shortly be available for inspection at www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/NSM.
Printed copies of these documents have today been posted to shareholders who have requested hard copies.
The 2017 AGM will be held at 2.00 pm on Thursday 4 May 2017 at 195 Piccadilly, London W1J 9LN.
In compliance with DTR 6.3.5, a description of the principal risks and uncertainties, details of related party transactions and a responsibility statement prepared for and contained within GKN's 2016 annual report are set out below. A condensed set of financial statements were appended to GKN's 2016 full year results announcement issued on 28 February 2017, which included an indication of important events that occurred during the year.
Page references below refer to page numbers in GKN's 2016 annual report.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Board is responsible for setting the Group's risk appetite and ensuring that appropriate risk management systems are in place.
The Board reviews the Group's principal risks throughout the year as part of its normal agenda, adopting an integrated approach to risk management by regularly discussing principal risks.
In addition, in the middle and at the end of each year, the Board assesses the Group's principal risks through our enterprise risk management (ERM) programme described opposite, taking the strength of the Group's control systems and our appetite for risk into account. We have a risk matrix which ensures that, between the Board and its committees, all the Group's principal risks are reviewed during the course of the year.
The Board delegates responsibility for day-to-day risk management to the Executive Committee, including the identification, evaluation and monitoring of key risks facing the Group and the implementation of Group-wide risk management processes and controls. The Executive Committee is supported in this by its Sub-Committee on Governance and Risk.
The Audit & Risk Committee keeps the effectiveness of the Group's risk management systems under review and reports to the Board on the results of its review. The occurrence of any material control issues, serious accidents or major commercial, financial or reputational issues, or the identification of new risks, are reported to the Board and/or Audit & Risk Committee as appropriate.
During 2016, we increased the level of oversight for certain principal risks while continuing to strengthen the independent assurance provided in respect of some risks. While overall we are happy with our risk management processes, our philosophy, as in all areas of the business, is one of continuous improvement.
HOW WE MANAGE RISK
The Group has four levels of defence through which it manages significant risks.
Level 1 Risk ownership and control
Our businesses are responsible for maintaining an effective risk and control environment as part of day-to-day operations under the direction of the Chief Executive and the Executive Committee. This includes implementation and regular monitoring and review by divisional management of processes and controls which are designed to ensure compliance with the Board's appetite for risk, Group policies and delegated authority levels, and the GKN Code. These front line controls are regularly updated to respond to the Group's changing risk profile.
Level 2 Monitoring and compliance
Group functions monitor adherence to the procedures set out by the Executive Committee and provide guidance to the businesses on their application. This includes ongoing reviews by our health and safety audit team, Group IT and financial control functions. Representatives of these functions report their findings to the Executive Sub-Committee on Governance and Risk or directly to the Executive Committee. The Sub-Committee reports twice a year to the Executive Committee on matters relating to the Group's governance, risk management and assurance framework, including areas of concern or proposals for improvement.
Level 3 Independent assurance
Independent assurance over the Group's risk management, control and governance processes is provided by the Group's Corporate Audit team, the Head of Risk and external assurance providers.
Level 4 Oversight
The Board, Executive Committee and Audit & Risk Committee provide oversight and direction in accordance with their respective responsibilities, more information on which is set out in the governance section of this annual report.
Our ERM programme
GKN's enterprise risk management (ERM) programme facilitates a common, Group-wide approach to the identification, analysis, and assessment of risks and the way in which they are managed, controlled and monitored.
Identify and analyse A broad spectrum of risks is considered through the ERM process. The Executive Committee and the Board review the output from ERM at both divisional and Group levels.
Manage and mitigate Management controls designed to monitor and mitigate the risks are documented. Risk owners are assigned for each risk.
Assess The ERM process provides a consistent set of definitions and a common approach to risk evaluation and assesses both risk likelihood and impact.
Respond The risk response is based on the assessment of potential risk exposure and an acceptable level of tolerance. The response reflects whether we 'accept' the risk on the basis of its assessed level of exposure and mitigating controls currently in place, or 'reduce' the risk through additional mitigation to bring it in line with required levels of tolerance.
Monitor The output from the ERM process is regularly reviewed together with the ongoing monitoring of progress against planned improvement actions.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The nature of both our business and our strategy means that we face a number of inherent risks and uncertainties.
The Board has carefully considered the type and extent of the principal risks to the Group achieving its objectives and delivering a satisfactory return for shareholders. These are summarised below, categorised according to the strategic objective to which they relate most closely. We seek to carefully manage risk, while at the same time recognising that we need to take some risk to achieve our strategic goals including to grow above the market.
Over time, our risk profile evolves and the Board's view of the principal risks facing the Group is updated accordingly. This year, acquisition integration has been removed as a principal risk following the successful integration of Fokker Technologies. Relationships with our largest joint venture Shanghai GKN HUAYU Driveline Systems Co Limited (SDS) remain strong and continue to develop positively. Accordingly, following the year end review, the Board has decided to remove this as a principal risk. Business continuity has also been removed as a separate principal risk. The Board considers the key elements of this risk to be appropriately covered by the remaining risks of supply chain, information resilience and health and safety. Each principal risk is described on the following pages together with the corresponding mitigating actions that are in place and an overview of the risk trends during 2016.
Risk trend ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------- Risks related to our strategic objectives Other risks ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Leading Leveraging Differentiating Driving operational in our a strong ourselves excellence chosen global presence through technology markets ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- Increasing * Supply chain * Technology and innovation ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- Stable * Highly competitive markets * Operating in global markets * Product quality * Pension funding * Customer concentration * Laws, regulations and corporate * Contract risk reputation * Programme management * People capability * Health and safety
* Information systems resilience ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- Decreasing * Contract risk ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- Supply chain ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend Ù ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- Description Our suppliers are key to our success. It is essential that suppliers and subcontractors continue to meet our high standards of technical competence, innovation, product quality, reliability, delivery performance, cost, financial stability, safety, ethics and social responsibility. Our supply chain network is exposed to potentially adverse events such as physical disruptions, environmental and industrial accidents, Changes in scarcity 2016 of supply and the During the insolvency of a year, the key supplier, any Executive of which could Committee impact our ability and Audit to deliver orders & Risk Committee to our customers. reviewed our supply The cost of our chain management products can be processes significantly in each division affected Mitigation and agreed by the cost of * Ongoing communication of our expectations of future actions. the underlying suppliers through our Supplier Code of Conduct. commodities and We continue materials from to carefully which they are * Contract terms and conditions that require our manage and made. Fluctuations suppliers to meet specified performance standards. monitor our in these costs supply chains cannot always be and, where passed on to our * Ongoing assessment of supplier technology and appropriate, customers. dependency. build on long-term Potential impact supplier A sustained supply * Monitoring of the financial and operational viability relationships. chain disruption, of key suppliers. or the delivery Under the of defective leadership product * Ongoing monitoring of inventory levels to ensure of the Group to us, could availability in times of production volatility. Finance Director impact and the Supply our ability to Chain Steering meet customer * Contingency plans designed to enable us to secure Committee, requirements, alternative key material supplies at short notice, to which comprises result in transfer or share production between manufacturing senior additional sites and to use substitute materials where required. representatives contractual from all liabilities three divisions, and have a * Dual sourcing where appropriate to reduce dependence we continue consequential on single suppliers. to deliver impact on on our supply financial chain excellence performance. * Supplier quality reviews and audits strategy. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- ------------- Technology and innovation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk trend Developing * Regular assessment of market and technology trends 2016 Ù innovative and drivers. We continue technologies for to invest our customers is in technology critical to * Close relationships and technical partnerships with and develop maintaining customers. internal our capabilities differentiation to help meet and competitive * Divisional technology plans aligned to emerging and customers' advantage. We may future trends and business strategy. expectations lose market share for improving or be subject to efficiency additional market * Technical leadership and promotion of engineering of aircraft, pressure if we best practice by our Engineering Fellowship. cars and fail to develop other vehicles innovative with solutions technologies * Regular review of current and future technology plans that are that our by the Group Technology Strategy Board. lighter and customers more fuel want. efficient. * Consideration of technology plans as part of the Potential impact Board's annual strategy review. We have continued The failure to to diversify launch new into targeted products, new * Focused investment in research and development. areas of product new technology applications or including derivatives of additive existing products manufacturing, to meet customer bionic tooling requirements and vehicle could have a electrification significant and have impact on future been recognised profitable growth for a number of industry innovation awards.
------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------
> Read more on how the Group continues to differentiate itself through technology in the Chief Executive's and divisional reviews on pages 19 to 35
Highly competitive markets ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend < > ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- Description GKN operates in highly competitive markets with customer decisions typically based on price, quality, technology and service. Contracts for major programmes are subject to highly competitive bidding processes and the strength of our competitors and general market Changes in conditions 2016 continue Strong competition to drive pricing and customer pressure and pricing pressures challenging have continued contractual terms. throughout 2016. Pressure Our margins may on margins come under continue in pressure Aerospace if competition and in the increases or as high-growth a result of electric and customer hybrid automotive actions. vehicle markets. An inability or Despite these delay in challenges, developing we continue or maintaining to win new sufficient or business and appropriate differentiate engineering and ourselves manufacturing through our capabilities technology. in our markets could further We have implemented increase a GKN-wide the risk. fixed cost optimisation Customer vertical programme integration and taken (including actions to OEMs taking progressively production redirect in-house), the expenditure entry of new towards competitors, productivity and the improvements. consolidation Previously of existing announced competitors restructuring also contribute activities to increased are well competition. progressed. Potential impact The reorganisation Competition risk, of GKN Driveline if not addressed, Mitigation from three could result in * Maintaining a balanced portfolio of businesses across regions into reduced sales and different end markets provides some protection two global profit margins against competition in particular markets. product lines and potentially and the elimination lost growth of a divisional opportunities. * Regular review of competition and market trends. structure An inability around our to secure new former Land business * Targeted investment in engineering, and a commitment Systems operations awards on major to Lean manufacturing, quality and customer will provide programmes could relationships. better strategic significantly and customer impact alignment future growth, * Flexible management of our variable and fixed cost and a more cash flow and base including outsourcing and low-cost sourcing efficient profitability. initiatives where appropriate. organisation. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- -------------
> Read more about the trends in each of our markets on pages 4 to 11
Customer concentration ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk trend There is * Regular review of the Group's relations with and 2016 < > significant exposure to key customers. There have customer been no concentration significant in the automotive * Extensive and regular dialogue with key customers and changes in and aerospace strong commercial and engineering relationships. the OEM customer industries landscape so a large with the portion * Quality, service and delivery performance are proportion of the Group's regularly reviewed based on customer KPIs. of business revenues comes from the Group's from a relatively top ten customers small number of * Credit exposure is actively reviewed and managed. remaining customers. stable during Around 50% of the 2016. No Group's sales is individual derived from its customer accounts top ten for more than customers. 10% of Group revenue. Potential impact The insolvency We have continued of, damage to to win new relations with, business in or significant each of our
worsening of key commercial markets terms with, a major customer could seriously affect the Group's future results, and could result in loss of market share and future business opportunities, asset write-offs and restructuring actions. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------
> Read more about key customer trends on pages 4 to 11, and about credit risk in note 19 to the financial statements
Operating in global markets ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend < > ----------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Description We operate globally and, as such, results could be impacted by global or regional changes in the macroeconomic or political environment, leading to changing consumer demand and preferences. Our businesses could be affected by changing Changes in consumer 2016 preference Market and associated conditions volatility in are discussed automotive in the Chief demand; Executive's challenging review on credit pages 19 to conditions 21 and the resulting in markets overview lack section on of access to pages 4 to finance 11. by customers and end Political consumers; and economic delay or uncertainty cancellation of continues orders for civil into 2017 aircraft and following changes the in the amount or US presidential timing of US election and military other political spending; and economic volatility changes across in agricultural Mitigation our markets and construction * The Group has a diversified portfolio of businesses including and mining across its markets providing some protection against in Europe, markets; individual market or country risks. the US and exchange rate Japan. fluctuations; and changing oil * Lead market indicators are regularly reviewed so that The UK's vote prices. we can respond quickly to changing trading to leave the conditions. EU has resulted Potential impact in some Major or uncertainty prolonged * Our mitigation strategy includes: in future economic or trading financial arrangements market * planning, budgeting and forecasting processes; between the deterioration, UK and the including rest of the movements * flexible management of variable and fixed cost base, world, and in exchange investment spending and working capital; falling rates expectations of key for UK GDP currencies * further diversification into in the short or political to medium uncertainty term. GKN in one of our other sectors which is a global key present new opportunities; business with markets, may * focused restructuring around 90% significantly of its products impact the manufactured Group's activities, where outside the operational necessary, to respond UK; this will performance to markets which limit the and financial have suppressed effect of condition. levels of the vote on Sustained market economic activity; the Group. weakness could and Weaker sterling lead to * regular review of our financial risk management following impairment processes, including foreign currency hedging. the referendum of assets or has so far site had a positive closures. It may * Alignment of our debt to the principal currencies in effect on also materially which our revenues and cash flows are generated the Group's impact our through cross currency swaps. reported sales customers, and earnings suppliers and but a negative other * Currency hedging within our hedging policy. impact on parties with its reported whom debt and we do business. * A strong balance sheet. liabilities. ----------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------- Laws, regulations and corporate reputation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend < > -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Changes in 2016 There have been no significant new regulations impacting the Group
during 2016, but our markets continue to be subject to robust enforcement activities in relation to existing regulations, particularly in relation to vehicle safety. We continue to regularly Description remind our The Group is senior managers subject about the to applicable laws importance and regulations of 'doing in the global the right jurisdictions thing' in and industries all our activities. in which it We emphasised operates. its importance This includes to all certain senior managers territories where as part of strong ethical our International standards may not Leadership be well established Conference or where parts and as an of the markets integral part in which we operate of the GKN are highly DNA (see the regulated. Chief Executive's Regulations include review on those related to page 20 for export controls, further details). environmental and We also rolled safety out our GKN requirements, Governance product safety, Handbook to tax laws, remind employees intellectual of our key property rights, Group policies competition laws and procedures and other ethical and launched business practices. Mitigation refresher * A strong culture of 'doing the right thing' which is training on Potential impact regularly emphasised by senior management. competition Non-compliance law compliance. could expose the Group to fines, * Group-wide governance policies and procedures, During the penalties, damage ongoing compliance training and strong oversight. year, we have to reputation, aligned suspension or the risk management debarment * Ongoing monitoring of regulatory developments in and governance from government major jurisdictions. procedures contracting or of our suspension of Fokker businesses export * Ongoing monitoring of employee concerns through our with the rest privileges. independent employee disclosure hotline. of the Group. -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------
> Read more about doing the right thing on pages 50 to 59
Product quality ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk Maintaining a high * Robust engineering design and validation processes 2016 trend level of quality from initial design and development through Excellence < > and safety in our production and into service. in quality products is essential. has continued We are exposed to be a priority to warranty, product * High levels of quality assurance are embedded in during the recall and liability robust manufacturing systems. year with claims in the event continuous that our products improvement fail to perform * Ongoing assessments of supply chain quality. programmes as expected. ongoing in each of our In automotive, * Regular reporting and monitoring of quality businesses. the industry in performance based upon customer KPIs. We continue general has experienced to monitor higher levels of quality and recalls in recent * Maintenance of critical parts lists. delivery years and the OEMs performance often seek contributions as viewed from throughout * External agency quality reviews and certifications by our customers the supply chain. . and strive This risk increases to continuously where: improve product * Robust contract terms and conditions. quality, safety -- vehicle manufacturers and delivery
offer key performance longer warranty indicators. periods; -- more vehicles Our are being built cross-divisional on standard platforms, Quality so a Committee single quality led a number issue can affect of initiatives a large number during the of vehicles; and year to share * regulators and our customers are taking a more best practice, stringent approach to recalling vehicles, review particularly if there is a possible safety issue. compliance with Group/ divisional standards In aerospace, customers and coordinate and regulators Group-wide impose very strict quality product safety management and quality obligations projects. on all aircraft suppliers. Potential impact A product failure could result in serious losses, damaging GKN's financial performance and potentially our reputation. In particular, the costs associated with vehicle or aircraft recalls can be significantly higher than the cost of simply replacing defective products. ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------
> Read more about our continuous improvement culture on page 56
Programme management --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk Many of the programmes * Embedded programme management, including investment 2016 trend entered into by phasing and product testing activities. New product < > the Group are complex launch and long term and issues are subject to * Periodic impairment reviews of capitalised experienced various performance development costs, including formal review at half in the year conditions which year and year end. at our must be adhered Newton to throughout the plant, which programme. The * Ongoing review and approval of key programmes by the had a management of such Executive Committee and the significant programmes brings financial risks related to: impact, have * Board. been * delays in product development or launch schedules; addressed and key * Regular review of 'lessons learned' and best practice learnings * failure to meet customer specifications or predict sharing. shared technical problems; across the Group * Periodic inspection of programmes by customers. (see page * inability to manufacture on time for the start of 19 for production or to required production volumes; further details). * dependence on key or customer-nominated suppliers; During the year, we have * failure to manage effectively continued to strengthen internal or customer-driven our change; and programme * inability to forecast accurately and to manage costs. management processes, organisation and training Potential impact where Ineffective programme required. management could This will result in damage continue in to customer relationships 2017 where or cancellation we plan to of a contract resulting further in claims for loss strengthen and reputational our damage. programme
of Poor performance independent against a contract reviews of could also undermine key the programme Group's ability deliverables to win future contracts . and could result in cost overruns and significantly lower returns than expected. ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- People capability ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend < > -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Changes in 2016 During 2016, we reviewed our incentive plans to ensure that the targets continue to be appropriate in light of shareholder expectations and remain an effective tool for attracting, retaining and incentivising Description senior managers The Group's ability and our top to deliver its executives. strategic The resulting objectives changes will is dependent upon form part the recruitment of our remuneration and retention of policy proposals sufficiently put to shareholders qualified, under the experienced and normal three-year motivated people. cycle. It is critical The recruitment for the Group to and development secure and maintain of young the relevant engineering capabilities talent continues in specific to be a focus geographical supported regions and by our Group-wide disciplines and divisional in both existing graduate programmes markets and to and a strong support growth apprenticeship markets. Mitigation programme. * Competitive reward packages together with focused We also continued Potential impact training and development programmes. to develop The failure to and align recruit, or the resources loss of, key * A culture that motivates individuals to perform to and capabilities personnel, the best of their abilities. to our growth and the failure markets. We to plan adequately are working for succession * Strong succession and development programmes. on improving or develop the how we set potential of objectives employees * Local initiatives designed to engage young people, and manage may impact the promote science, technology, engineering and performance, Group's ability mathematics continually to deliver its improving strategic and our performance financial * (STEM) subjects and encourage the next generation of management objectives. young engineers. system. -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------
> Read more in our sustainability report on pages 50 to 59
Health and safety ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk trend Safety is our * Consistent Group-wide application of health and 2016 < > number safety programmes. Regrettably one priority. We there were manage safety two fatalities carefully * Regular reporting and monitoring of health and safety during the through extensive performance. year - see Group-wide page 52 for processes, further details. yet we recognise * Health and safety audits to ensure adherence to Group We have completed we can never be policies and procedures. a thorough complacent. investigation Therefore and strengthened we continue to * A focus on process and behavioural safety through a our controls include this as number of Group-wide risk assessment and training accordingly, a principal risk programmes. particularly and an area which in the areas will always be of managing a priority for * Maintenance of insurance for costs associated with visitors and GKN. injury related actions or claims against the Group. contractors while on site
Potential impact and workplace A serious * Targeted incident response and business continuity movement of accident plans. vehicles and in the workplace pedestrians. could have a major The Group's impact on underlying employees AFR and as well as their ASR again families, improved this colleagues year and we and communities. continued Such an incident to increase could also result our near miss in legal claims, reporting reputational as a key leading damage indicator and financial of our health loss. and safety performance. Hazard awareness and risk assessment programmes continued with a particular focus on identifying and addressing potential catastrophic hazards. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------
> Read more about health and safety on pages 52 and 53
Information systems resilience ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk trend The Group could * Formal risk-based governance framework including 2016 < > be impacted dedicated IT security policies and related compliance The Group negatively processes, ongoing risk reviews, IT security has continued by information awareness training and robust systems and processes to strengthen technology to manage access, information assets, threats and its mitigating security vulnerabilities. processes threats including and controls unauthorised over the security access * External support and benchmarking of best practice of our to intellectual information systems security and resilience. information property or other systems. In controlled particular, information. * Ongoing development of appropriate incident detection we completed Interruptions to and response plans and capabilities. a review the Group's of compliance information with the National systems could * Disaster recovery contingency plans which are Institute also regularly tested including data centres where the of Standards adversely affect risk is deemed to be the greatest. and its day-to-day Technology operations. (NIST) IT * Executive Committee oversight of IT security and security The inherent assurance matters requirements security stipulated threat is for all US considered Government highest in GKN contractors Aerospace where by the end data is held in of 2017 and relation to civil have defined aerospace clear actions technology to achieve and controlled compliance. military contracts. Potential impact A major disruption to information systems could have a significant adverse impact on the Group's operations or its ability to trade. The loss of confidential information, intellectual property or controlled data could result in fines and damage to the Group's reputation, and could adversely affect its ability to win future contracts. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------- Pension funding ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Risk trend < > --------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Changes in 2016 Falling yields on long-term bonds following the UK's decision to leave the EU has resulted in an increase in the UK pension liability. In addition, weaker sterling has so far had a negative impact on the reported liability associated with our overseas pensions. The Group continues
to have a reasonable Description degree of The Group has a visibility number of defined over the likely benefit pension short- to plans with aggregate medium-term net liabilities funding cash of GBP2,033 million flows and at 31 December requirements 2016. These plans of its pension are exposed to schemes and the risk of changes builds these in asset values, cash flows discount rates, into its budget inflation and and strategic mortality planning process. assumptions. We will continue to monitor Potential impact the impact Increases to the of market pension deficit volatility could lead to a and seek to requirement for Mitigation reduce volatility additional cash * Close cooperation with scheme fiduciaries regarding where appropriate. contributions to management of pension scheme assets and liabilities Discussions these plans, thereby , with the trustees reducing the including asset selection and hedging actions. of the UK amount of cash pension schemes available to meet in relation the Group's other * Alternative funding and risk mitigation actions are to the triennial operating, implemented where appropriate. funding valuation investment are progressing and financing in a constructive requirements. * Agreed recovery plans where required. manner. --------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------
> Read more about the Group's pension arrangements in note 24 to the financial statements
Contract risk ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Mitigation Changes in Risk trend Across our * Robust bid and contract management processes 2016 / businesses including thorough reviews of contract terms and During the an increasing conditions, contract-specific risk assessments a year, we percentage nd consistently of revenues are clear delegation of authority for approvals. followed the generated through strengthened contracts which contract management are long term in * Continuous review of contract performance. processes nature and subject introduced to complex terms in each division and conditions. in Contracts include 2015. These commitments processes relating aim to ensure to pricing, quality effective and safety, and management technical and of risks associated customer with complex requirements. design and build contracts. Both our aerospace and automotive businesses enter into design and build contracts. These are complex contracts that are often long-term, so it is important that the contracted risk is carefully managed. Specifically within GKN Aerospace, the Group has risk and revenue sharing partnerships with key engine manufacturers. These contain formalised risk sharing arrangements relating to risks which are not always within GKN management control. Potential impact A failure to fully understand contract risks or to anticipate technical challenges and estimate costs accurately at the outset of a contract can lead to unexpected liabilities, increased outturn costs and reduced profitability. --------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -------------
> Read more about key examples of new business wins in 2016 in the divisional business reviews on pages 24 to 35
Related party transactions
In the ordinary course of business, sales and purchases of goods take place between subsidiaries and equity accounted investment companies priced on an arm's-length basis. Sales by subsidiaries to equity accounted investments in 2016 totalled GBP44 million (2015: GBP35 million). The amount due at the year end in respect of such sales was GBP11 million (2015: GBP12 million). Purchases by subsidiaries from equity accounted investments in 2016 totalled GBP10 million (2015: GBP7 million). The amount due at the year end in respect of such purchases was GBP3 million (2015: GBP2 million).
At 31 December 2016, a Group subsidiary had GBP10 million payable to equity accounted investments companies in respect of unsecured financing facilities bearing interest at one month LIBOR plus 1/ 8 % (2015: GBP10 million).
During the prior year, a child of a member of key management was employed by a subsidiary company. The remuneration expense during the period of employment in 2015 on an arm's-length basis amounted to GBP2,336.
Statement of Directors' responsibilities
Each of the Directors as at the date of the annual report, whose names and functions are set out on pages 60 and 61, confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
-- the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole;
-- the strategic report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face; and
-- the annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.
Approved by the Board of GKN plc and signed on its behalf by
Mike Turner CBE
Chairman
27 February 2017
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This announcement contains forward looking statements which were made in good faith based on information available at 27 February 2017, being the date of approval of the 2016 annual report. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a number of risks and uncertainties that are inherent in any forward looking statement which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. Nothing in this document should be regarded as a profits forecast.
GKN plc LEI: 213800QNZ22GS95OSW84
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
ACSJLMITMBATBLR
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 29, 2017 11:03 ET (15:03 GMT)
1 Year GKN Chart |
1 Month GKN Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions